Monday Iran Talking Points

from LobeLog: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for September 13th, 2010:

Wall Street Journal: Reuel Marc Gerecht and Mark Dubowitz, respectively a Senior Fellow and Executive Director at the neoconservative Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, point out that while sanctions have led to decreased trade between some American allies (European countries and Japan) and Iran, China and Russia will continue to fill “the void” unless America punishes their “subversiveness.” The authors call on the U.S. to bar domestic business with subsidiaries of Russian and Chinese energy companies involved in Iran, force, block them from receiving U.S. contracts and state pension fund divestment from their businesses. They acknowledge ”any U.S. action will surely infuriate Moscow and Beijing, as well as those in Washington who have worked to ‘reset’ our relations with both countries.” But they see the alternative as “collapsing our Iran policy.” They conclude by raising the specter of an Israeli strike on Iranian nuclear facilities should the U.S. fail its “test of wills with Russia and China over Iran”, noting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “will decide one of these days whether a nuclear-armed Iran is acceptable, or not.”

Los Angeles Times: The L.A. Times has a piece by Ramin Mostaghim and Borzou Daraghi, accompanied online by an AP video, on the possible release of Sarah Shroud. Shroud is one of the three American hikers arrested on espionage charges near the Iraq-Iran border more than a year ago. Her release that was scheduled for last Saturday, initially portrayed by Iran as an act of clemency to mark the end of Ramadan, has been delayed. Bail is now set at $500,000, according to both a lawyer for the hikers and the prosecutor. The U.S. government and their families have denied that the hikers are spies. Daraghi and Mostaghim note the prosecutor “told reporters that Iran had enough evidence to prove the three were spies and the ‘Americans have responded too,’ hinting at possible behind-the-scenes diplomatic communications between Iran and the U.S. over the hikers.”

Reuters: IAEA Director-General Yukiya Amano said on Monday that, “Iran’s repeated objection to the designation of inspectors with experience in Iran’s nuclear fuel cycle and facilities hampers the inspection process.” Iran insists the two inspectors were banned from entering the country in June because they have provided false information about the Iranian nuclear program. The IAEA and the US argue that Iran’s actions are an attempt to limit the monitoring capabilities of the UN’s nuclear watchdog. Tehran has cited its right to refuse access for specific inspectors under the non-proliferation accord with the IAEA.

Reuters: William Maclean reports that according to Mikhail Marelov, chairman of the foreign affairs committee of the Federation Council of Russia, his country’s support of Iran’s nuclear energy program is intended to encourage Iranian compliance with the IAEA. “That is why, if we cooperate with Iran in the field of nuclear energy when we do Bushehr, this is how we try to keep these guys playing by the rules of the IAEA,” Maretov told the International Institute of International Studies think tank. Moscow is finding it difficult to balance trade with Iran and improved relations with the US. Iran continues to express anger over Russia’s refusal to veto the sanctions while the US and European Union are calling on Russia to put more pressure on Iran to abandon its alleged nuclear weapons program.

The Daily Beast: Philip Shenon reports that the 9/11 Commission overlooked “explosive material” suggesting connections between the 9/11 attacks and the Iranian government. The 9/11 Commission, says Shenon, concentrated its research on CIA and FBI terrorism files and mostly ignored the NSA archives. Not until the end of the investigation did the Commission search NSA. Its belatedly acquired findings on Iran resulted in “the Iran material was forced into the commission’s final report with limited context and without any chance for followup by the commission; the panel was about to shut down.” An anonymous “former commission staff member” told Shenon, “”It’s kind of shocking to me that no one has tried to get back in there since. We certainly didn’t see everything at NSA.”

Author: Eli Clifton

Visit Lobelog.com for the latest news analysis and commentary from Inter Press News Service's Washington bureau chief Jim Lobe.

5 thoughts on “Monday Iran Talking Points”

  1. There seems to be an all-out offensive to get America to attack Iran. It also seems to be a two pronged offensive – one part going after Iran in particular, the other going after Islam as a whole. I think this is necessary because the evidence of Iran's "evil nature" is so thin. How do you advocate killing and destroying a country based upon such venal sins such as having captured our embassy in their country, thirty some years ago? And not without cause either. The other "crimes" they have committed are laughable – wanting to have deterrants to an insane Israel thirsty for their destruction and a general unwillingness to allow America to turn their recent enemy, Iraq, into a launching point for American/Israeli aggression against them.
    So there is a necessity to prove Iran is, in general. worthy of destruction because its people are basically evil. To achieve this, why not make all Muslims everywhere evil. Afterall, after Iran, the next targets are Syria, lebanon, Egypt – all Islamic. Why not undermine them all at the same time. Although this takes a major effort, it is obvious that this effort is being exerted.

  2. The evidence that there is a conscious effort to defame Islam is quite apparent. I, personally have received a veritable shitload of emails full of hysterical fear of Islam – the junk about Sharia Law soon to be implemented by the Obama Administration, the arising of the Great Caliph, etc. The efforts of the Zionist neo-cons to attack Iran in specific is obvious as they are out in the public. But this shadow effort to defame Islam is nebulous. It comes in the form of anonymous emails. Who is behind that. I believe it is the same Zionist neo-cons – they have the strength of their unrelenting envy and hatred of all other people sufficient for the task.

  3. One point – "shitload" is an appropriate unit of measurement for the barrage of this internet junk.

  4. Please do not call these behaviours of the Ayatollahs, as "Iran". These are the behaviours of Islamic State. That is what the Ayatollahs would prefer to call all countries. That way the word "Iran" is not in the same context as the Ayatollahs' behaviours. Thank you.

  5. I would really like the lower-degree leaf nodes of this Taxonomy Menu to point to, to not Books normally, but to a selected book (I plan to have, say, about 100 or so books). It is a guide withchapters en in every chapter a numer of articles. Download thousand of free online textbooks on numerous topics you can learn on your units. Vanessa Bassil

Comments are closed.