Friday Iran Talking Points

from LobeLog: News and Views Relevant to U.S.-Iran relations for September 24th, 2010:

Washington Post: In an article focused on President Barack Obama’s address to the UN, Scott Wilson leads with Obama’s reaction to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s insinuation that the U.S. government played a role in the terror attacks of September 11, 2001. Obama told BBC Persian, which broadcasts into Iran, Ahmadinejad’s remarks were “offensive”, “hateful” and unacceptable: ”Particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones, people of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation, for him to make a statement like that was inexcusable.”

Huffington Post: In a Q&A with Shaun Jacob Halper, leading non-proliferation expert Mark Fitzpatrick says he is convinced that Iran wants a nuclear weapons “capability” if not the weapons themselves. Fitzpatrick answers questions on whether there is a legal and moral double standard applied to the nuclear programs of Israel and Iran (legally, says Fitzpatrick, Israel is not party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty, but morally the answer is more murky); grades Obama and German Chancellor Angela Merkel on how they deal with Iran (both A’s); and on the viability of a sanctions regime and negotiations. While Iran does not have an “apocalyptic worldview” and is not “irrational,” he’s not sure if the Iranians are “appeasable” if the desire for “a nuclear weapons capability [is] more than anything else.” He concludes, “And if so than no, they are not appeasable.”

National Review Online: Anne Bayefsky, a senior fellow at the neoconservative Hudson Institute, compares the speeches of Ahmadinejad and Obama at the UN General Assembly. She writes Obama extended his hand for diplomacy with Iran and used his speech to corner Israel. “Ahmadinejad got the message,” she contends, adding that “Israel is vulnerable with President Obama in office, and Iran has no serious reason to believe that hate and terror will be on the losing end any time soon.” She said the speeches demonstrate that Obama “does not understand the threat facing America and the world from Iran,” and that “Ahmadinejad, therefore, took the opportunity provided by the U.N. to slam the door once more in President Obama’s face.”

Commentary: Jennifer Rubin contrasts President Obama’s UN speech, which she labels “namby-pamby” for its failure to detail military options, with the current push by the far-right Christians United for Israel (CUFI) and a group of House Republicans to escalating measures — including a military strike — against Iran. CUFI’s video accuses Ahmadinejad of committing “incitement to genocide” and urges his prosecution by the International Criminal Court. (Eli has written about the hypocrisy of this tack from right-wing supporters of Israel.) The letter from Republican members of the House calls for Obama to “take whatever action is necessary to prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon. All options must be on the table.” Rubin laments that Obama is not taking Iran’s threats seriously and that should Israel act unilaterally against Iran, the U.S. should “stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel.”

Author: Ali Gharib

Visit Lobelog.com for the latest news analysis and commentary from Ali Gharib and Inter Press News Service's Washington bureau chief Jim Lobe.

One thought on “Friday Iran Talking Points”

  1. Piss on Anne Bayefsky, that f–kin’ liar. And piss on Jennifer Rubin, that Zionist scumbag.

  2. "Obama told BBC Persian, which broadcasts into Iran, Ahmadinejad’s remarks were “offensive”, “hateful” and unacceptable: ”Particularly for him to make the statement here in Manhattan, just a little north of Ground Zero, where families lost their loved ones, people of all faiths, all ethnicities who see this as the seminal tragedy of this generation, for him to make a statement like that was inexcusable.”

    Yeah, well I'm an American, and I've done the same thing several times on the anniversary of 9-11, next to the WTC site itself. I guess I'm "unacceptable" for thinking there has to be a MURDER TRIAL with public presentation of evidence when 3,000 people in Manhattan are MURDERED. Then again, it's pretty obvious why people advocating for murder trials would be "unacceptable" to murderers like Obama.

  3. "Iran does not have an 'apocalyptic worldview' "

    Maybe they should have asked him if the US has an apocalyptic worldview. Many Americans do.

  4. On the one hand, the Bushis benefited the most from 9-11, so it's tempting to think they did it. On the other hand, they were so thoroughly incompetent at everything else they tried to do, it's hard to believe they could succeed in making 9-11 happen. At most, they jumped on an opportunity offered to them. In fact, it was poisoned bait. The consequences of 9-11 have certainly harmed the US state and people.

  5. Why is our government and news media so indignant about Ahmadinejad practicing free speech, that is after all what we all believe in, isn´t it? Our same government and media can continuously make daily remarks about "all options are on the table" – they not only insult Iran but threaten it as well, day in and day out. Iran gets to give its opinion one time and everyone in America upity dupity. We really love freedom of speech, we really do.

  6. I'm always reminded of that famous Shakespeare quote whenever anyone says something purely for the shock value, anyone recall what Chavez said about Bushy in relation to satan at the UN?

    Methinks the man doth protest too much. All 9/11 roads lead to the back office at Mossad and what they knew on 8/11

  7. Many younger adults have a tough time attempting to decide on a few of the good books that they should learn. Ebooks have a incredible array of versatile choices and amenities. Half Girlfriend, a new book by the famend writer Chetan Bhagat is near to its release date. Just lately enjoying poker has grow to be extremely popular all all over the world.
    Sans 78

Comments are closed.