Antiwar on the Left and Right – Wednesday in San Francisco

On Wednesday, October 6, 2010 at 6 pm, a panel of speakers from a variety of political positions, all of whom oppose the war in Afghanistan, will meet at First Unitarian Universalist Church in San Francisco to discuss how to build a consensus to end the war in Afghanistan.

Panelists:
John Dennis, Republican Candidate, 8th Congressional District
Daniel Ellsberg, Author and Activist
Michael Eisenscher, US Labor Against the War Nat’l Coordinator
Karel, Green 960 AM Radio Talk Show Host
Angela Keaton, Antiwar.com Developmental Director
Moderator: Jeff Johnson, PeacePundit.com

Time and Place:
Wednesday, October 6, 2010, 6 pm
First Unitarian Universalist Society of San Francisco
1187 Franklin Street, at Geary Blvd
Admission: FREE

On October 7th 2001 US military aircraft began bombing Kabul. Nine years later, US military operations continue in Afghanistan with no end in sight. Within the next year, the US-led war on Afghanistan will exceed the length of the 1980s Soviet occupation of that unfortunate country.

The war has already claimed the lives of over 1100 American service men and women; while more than 7500 have been wounded. Much larger numbers of Afghan and Pakistani civilians have lost their lives due to US and NATO bombing, including by pilotless drones.

A recent opinion poll shows that 58% of Americans oppose the war in Afghanistan, yet both Democratic and Republican leaders still support it.

17 thoughts on “Antiwar on the Left and Right – Wednesday in San Francisco”

  1. 金福宝宝取名软件,宝宝起名软件,兔宝宝取名,虎宝宝起名软件,婴儿起名,兔宝宝起名软件 官方网站:http://www.jinfu.org

  2. I want to know how this panel can be serious with its members representing organizations whose full political weight and interest has been behind these wars from the get-go??

    How are we to take even an ostensibly "antiwar" Republican seriously given the record of the party he registers for, supports and publicly adhered to? Can a party label not become toxic after millions of deaths in so many countries?

    I will believe any of these are serious antiwar voices when they begin to disaffiliate from powerful national organizations whose very existence and essence is aggressive war and the suspension of civil liberties.

    [Of course, the same goes for working in a "labor" movement that is nothing but a pathetic partisan hack attachment to the pro-war Democratic Party].

    Whatever these partisan hacks say, they are objectively pro-war and pro-aggression by supporting the very political parties that have and can only get us into these evil messes!

    1. Oh fuck off. Dennis opposes the wars: Nancy Pelosi, his opponent, has voted FOR those wars consistently. "Ostensibly" my ass. I'll believe you're serious when you disaffiliate from your sectarian insistence on supporting the party of Obama, the warmonger-in-chief, regardless of what they do when in power. "Objectively" pro-war in spite of their own views? Put down the crack pipe, bud, and get over yourself.

  3. Agreed! Letting a real anti-war anti-intervention movement be hijacked by political party people from the corrupt two military-industrial-dependent corporatist parties is ridiculous!

    Its not any better to let these Democrats or Republicans be the voice of the movement than it is to let those Communist front groups act as if what they stand for has anything to do with a real peace movement.

    The first thing that would make an antiwar "consensus" real [STOP NOW is the consensus position] is by first declaring itself to be an INDEPENDENT NONPARTISAN movement.

    We should tell these politicos, who are part of the problem, not the solution, they are not welcome !!

  4. Anybody against the war is ok with me. I would warmly welcome the Cheneys and Hillary if they converted.

  5. Cheney was operating like a sneaky coward in the shadows like GWB's puppet master. That is definitely not Hillary's style, she'll be more collaborative.

  6. Not all conservatives or Republicans favor the wars. Ron Paul, George Will, John Dennis, BJ Lawson all consistently speak out against it. Before the neo-cons took over, the Republicans were elected to end the war in Vietnam. I hope more Ron Paul Republicans can be the voice of the anti-war right.

    1. When the Republicrats were elected in 1968 it took them seven more years to end American involvement.

  7. Reading books which can be part of a collection additionally makes a toddler desperate to get to the next adventure, eager to know what happens subsequent, and can make them understand how satisfying studying can be. With their entrance covers facing outward, and are set on retaining them as organized as attainable, you ought to contemplate a lounge e book show stand with separate pockets for every e book. I Give Frist

Comments are closed.