Antiwar.com’s Week in Review | October 23, 2011

Angela Keaton, October 23, 2011

Antiwar.com’s Week in Review | October 23, 2011

IN THIS ISSUE

  • Capitalizing on a post-Gadhafi Libya
  • Obama announces Iraq "withdrawal"
  • New war of choice in Uganda
  • Violent milestones in Afghanistan
  • Assorted news from the empire
  • What’s new at the blog?
  • Columns
  • Antiwar Radio
  • Support Antiwar.com!

Gadhafi Killed in Libya

Muammar Gadhafi was captured by rebel fighters in the National Transitional Council in his hometown of Sirte then beaten and executed with a shot to the head. The extrajudicial killing of the former Libyan dictator ousted with the help of an eight-month bombing campaign was crudely celebrated by U.S. leaders and prompted a speech from President Obama in which he misleadingly put himself on the side of the people in the Arab Spring.

NATO has "tentatively decided" to stop launching airstrikes in Libya following the death of Gadhafi, as U.S. leaders pledge aid and attempt to capitalize on the new NTC-led government.

When Leave Means Stay

President Barack Obama announced that all U.S. troops would leave Iraq by December, in keeping with the 2008 Status of Forces Agreement. Billed as making good on his campaign promise to end the war, Obama actually had this decision forced on him after years of pressuring Iraq to allow thousands of troops past the deadline. An expanded diplomatic presence and thousands of mercenary soldiers will still remain, contradicting the notion that there will actually be a "full withdrawal."

Obama referred to a new relationship with Iraq, presumably characterized by large packages of economic and military aid to abusive governments and armies in exchange for conformity to U.S. interests, as understood by Washington national security planners.

Obama’s New War of Choice in Uganda

Obama’s decision to send 100 combat troops to Uganda to fight the terrorist group the Lord’s Resistance Army, while unexpected, follows a familiar foreign policy doctrine. Here, Obama is countering a Ugandan group on behalf of the Ugandan regime, whose forces can now better focus on waging a proxy war in Somalia for the U.S. Officials claim U.S. troops won’t be engaged in combat, although that is unlikely, considering America’s previous interventions in that region.

John Glaser appeared on Russia Today to discuss the intervention in Uganda, warning that "this has all the ingredients of a prolonged military quagmire."

Double the Death, Double the Fun

American and Afghan troops forced civilians to march ahead of them on roads believed to have been filled with bombs and land mines planted by insurgents, according to allegations from villagers in southern Afghanistan. An investigation is under way, and the charge, if true, would be a war crime. Meanwhile, three people were killed and two detained in a botched U.S. night raid on the home of a former Afghan senator, an incident Hamid Karzai is asking to be investigated. In a new milestone, the U.S. death toll in Afghanistan is now more than double that during President Bush’s tenure, with 1,153 in just 33 months of Obama’s term.

The U.S. has dramatically escalated its attacks on the Haqqani network in eastern Afghanistan, as top U.S. officials threaten Pakistan for not doing that work for them.

Assorted News from the Empire

What’s New at the Blog?

Jeremy Sapienza highlighted supposedly "progressive" U.S. Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren’s hawkish views on Iran. Similarly, Matt Barganier posted supposedly "progressive" blogger Kevin Drum’s consistent subservience to pro-war leaders, as well as his magazine’s strange excitement about "secularizing" the military. Justin Raimondo approvingly cited Ron Paul’s plan cut $1 trillion from the federal budget. Scott Horton pointed out the rabid racism and violence of Rachel Abrams.

John Glaser documented the Afghan war’s deadly effect on children, Herman Cain’s further display of foreign policy ignorance, Paul Pillar’s all too welcoming attitude to Obama’s Uganda intervention, the drone war’s friendly fire, and how Obama was for child soldiers before he was against them. Glaser also railed against the free-speech-killing Stolen Valor Act, the Obama administration’s murder of Anwar al-Awlaki’s 16-year-old son, Michele Bachmann’s disgraceful Iraq comments, America’s new lease on Libya, drones’ ability to fuel forever war, and possible MeK involvement in the Iran plot.

Columns

Justin Raimondo wrote of the post-Gadhafi Libyan chaos induced by NATO, Britain’s defense minister Liam Fox’s ties to Israeli intelligence, and the return of populist wars. Ivan Eland wrote of the impending quagmire in Uganda. Philip Giraldi gave his expert, skeptical analysis on the alleged Iranian plot to kill a Saudi ambassador in Washington. Kelley B. Vlahos wrote about Winslow Wheeler’s charge against the Goliaths of war. Nebojsa Malic explained what the Occupy Wall Street movement has in common with NATO occupation in Kosovo and what it doesn’t.

Antiwar Radio

Scott Horton had on Gareth Porter this week to discuss the false intelligence being peddled about the alleged Iranian plot. John Glaser was on to talk about Obama’s new war of choice in Uganda. Jason Ditz examined the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Uganda. Flynt Leverett talked about recent overtures in U.S.-Iranian affairs. Philip Giraldi gave his two cents on the intelligence in the alleged Iranian assassination plot. Andrew Cockburn discussed the epidemic of improved explosive devices in Afghanistan. The Other Scott Horton reviewed the Obama policy of assassinating citizens without due process. Pepe Escobar analyzed America’s neo-colonialism in Africa. Anthony Gregory discussed the arguments bound to convince social conservatives to end the war on drugs. Grant F. Smith argued that it’s against U.S. interests to maintain Israel’s nuclear secrets. And Patrick Cockburn discussed Gadhafi’s death in Libya and what to expect going forward.

Support Antiwar.com!

Apply for the Antiwar.com Visa card and support us with every purchase you make.

Antiwar.com now earns between 6 and 15 percent of all Amazon.com purchases if you click on the Amazon button on any Antiwar.com page before you go shopping.

Shop at Antiwar.com and buy Liberty Stickers and other merch!

Antiwar.com is a 15-year-old, nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to the cause of anti-interventionism. Accepting no government money, we rely solely on the generous support of readers just like you. How can you help us spread a policy of peace?

Lots of ways. Forward this newsletter to your friends and encourage them to subscribe. (We don’t spam!) Fill out an application for the Antiwar.com Capital One credit card. We get a cut of every purchase you make. Read your news on Twitter? Follow Antiwarcom, Antiwarnews, Antiwar2, Antiwar in Spanish, Scott Horton, John Glaser, Jason Ditz, Kelley Vlahos, and Jeremy Sapienza for timely updates. Have a clunker in the driveway? Give it to us and then write it off! Want to donate your car, trailer, boat, or other junk to Antiwar.com? Please call 1-800-240-0160 for free next-day pickup. Or just make a good old-fashioned donation. Questions? Call 323-512-7095 or email akeaton@antiwar.com.

Don’t forget to sign the open letter to Obama and Congress to end the wars: ComeHomeAmerica.us




3 Responses to “Antiwar.com’s Week in Review | October 23, 2011”

  1. Bachmann is 100% right about Obama's total failure in Iraq. Hilary Clinton said "We got everything we asked for." Obama's foreign policy of "leading from behind" has resulted in the U.S. being treated with disrespect, not only by our enemies and rivals like China, but also by our allies, all the inevitable result of Obama's "America Last" policy.

  2. Obama's foreign policy of "leading from behind" has resulted in the U.S. being treated with disrespect, not only by our enemies and rivals like China, but also by our allies, all the inevitable result of Obama's "America Last" policy.

  3. In some cases, a bought review may be independent, if the person that is hired to do the review has a strong reputation for independence and integrity. Even if a bought review from a respected critic is actually independent, the perception of potential bias will remain, due to the financial relationship between the company and the critic. Thanks.