‘Kill, Occupy, Kill’ is a Losing Strategy

The Guardian reported on Sunday that “senior British officials believe that a ‘last push’ in 2012 is likely to definitively destroy al-Qaida’s remaining senior leadership in Pakistan.” The vicious drone war, wildly accelerated under Obama, has managed to kill a considerable number of al Qaeda members, despite killing and maiming many more civilians.

But don’t prepare you palms for applause just yet: the same report acknowledged that the Obama administration’s capacity to kill is not a winning strategy even if it has crippled terrorist operatives in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province.

However, well-informed sources outside government and close to Islamist groups in north Africa said at least two relatively senior al-Qaida figures have already made their way to Libya, with others intercepted en route, raising fears that north Africa could become a new “theatre of jihad” in coming months or years.

Libya isn’t the only suspected “new theater” mentioned in the piece: Somalia and Nigeria were also noted locales for al Qaeda.

This really shows the futility of the U.S. strategy in Afghanistan-Pakistan. Extending the military occupation of Afghanistan and secret war in Pakistan (against the will of huge majorities in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and America) until we kill enough al Qaeda members does two things: (1) makes them leave Af-Pak, and (2) ensures that violent anti-American sentiment is constantly regenerated. By most accounts, the war has only exacerbated the terrorist threat facing America by fueling hatred and fundamentalism. When ninety-two percent of Afghans have never even heard of 9/11, the war is viewed as an unprovoked abuse. In fact, the war was intended to be directly against US interests. Al Qaeda planned to draw America into a long and costly war there while simultaneously provoking America to commit crimes that would predictably incite extremism and hatred against the U.S. far beyond the border of Afghanistan and Pakistan. That seems to be exactly what has happened.

And now the Obama administration has expanded America’s secret wars to Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria, and beyond, apparently applying the same failed strategy in these “new theaters.”

For the record, I think the so-called terrorist threat is vastly inflated. The point is not that there is a worldwide Islamic jihad growing throughout the world. The point is that aggressive interventionist foreign policy will continue to create terrorists ready to attack America or Americans. What threat there is will dissipate if the motivation is taken away.

10 thoughts on “‘Kill, Occupy, Kill’ is a Losing Strategy”

  1. Report out this morning maintains that "al-Qaeda" has picked up shop AND moved back to Iraq. So there you go. Wait a minute, hasn't that gag been pulled once already?

  2. the more places al-qaede, or cia agents dressed as them show up, the more places the raf and usaf can carpet bomb back to the simian stone age

  3. don't worry we have looked over the strategy and found the vital flaw!
    now instead of kill, occupy, kill.
    we will, kill, kill, kill…

  4. The US is doing what AQ is supposed to be doing, in spades. It has become what it fears most – a world-wide terror organization that kills indescriminately, or at least within the parameters of what it calls 'intel' – which amounts to much the same thing.

  5. Terror plots uncovered in the US turn out to be FBI sting operations. Then theres all these drone bombings and missile strikes on people in hovels on the other side of the world who are supposedly planning the next 9/11.

  6. This is often good most well-known check this page. On the web a lot of very significant thing in it. It will be superb to check out that folks include extremely desired and perhaps reported within your web page. Anticipating to generate more superior information sites along with user discussion forums through the individual. Enjoy it
    Nandroid Backup

  7. Yeah, because we all know that Obama the Peace Laureate is going to end the wars, evacuate the military bases, bring the troops home and shrink the military down to the size necessary only for territorial defence.

Comments are closed.