The “increasingly large chorus of nations” in Central America arguing for decriminalization of drugs instead of Washington’s failed drug war seem not to have received their warranted share of focus at the Summit of the Americas conference this weekend. The havoc and blood wrought by drug prohibition and efforts by Washington to militarize the issue have been so detrimental to nations like Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, et al. that they are pushing the Obama administration for a change. Obama said no, although apparently “agreed to direct the Organization of American States to name a group of experts to study the issue.”
Instead of confronting this vital issue, the Obama administration’s focus at the Summit was apparently Cuba. New York Times: “Americas Meeting Ends With Discord Over Cuba.”
A summit meeting of Western Hemisphere nations ended without a final statement of consensus on Sunday, after the United States and some Latin American nations remained sharply divided over whether to continue excluding Cuba from such gatherings.
The issue of Cuba’s exclusion from events like the Summit of the Americas gathering has been a perennially divisive one, and increasingly so lately, more than 50 years after the United States imposed its embargo of the island nation after the military takeover by Fidel Castro in 1959. While the push to include Cuba was led by leftist governments in the region, including Venezuela and Bolivia, Mr. Santos also joined in the effort, calling the American position a cold war anachronism.
“Cuba, unlike the other countries that are participating, has not yet moved to democracy,” Mr. Obama said. And referring generally to other Latin American countries’ success in overcoming dictatorship and oppression in favor of democracy, Mr. Obama asked “why we would ignore that same principle here.”
Maybe because the U.S. has a history of preventing democracy in Central America, not promoting it. Over 100 years ago, the U.S. took advantage of the Cuban revolution against colonial Spain and intervened on behalf of the revolutionaries only to betray an initial promise not to “exercise sovereignty, jurisdiction, or control over said island,” and instead President McKinley announced that the U.S. would rule Cuba under “the law of belligerent right over conquered territory.” Fast forward through the state terror towards Cuba during the Cold War to present day. Decades of sanctions and non-engagement has almost certainly helped keep the undemocratic Castro regime in power.
The U.S. also overthrew the democratically elected government of Nicaragua in a military coup early in the 20th century, replacing it with a right-wing paramilitary regime. Fast forward to Reagan’s illegal support of terrorist proxies to overthrow the Sandinistas which helped keep the country in bloody conflict and poverty for another generation.
Washington overthrew another democratically elected regime in Guatemala in 1954, replacing it with a military junta headed by Colonel Carlos Castillo. Throughout the 1980s, the U.S. “not only covered up, but aided and abetted war crimes and genocide in Guatemala.” Now, Guatemala receives approximately $1oo million in aid annually from the U.S., despite a record of corruption and ties to the drug gangs. Also currently wreaking mayhem, The Kaibiles, the ruthless U.S.-trained Guatemalan state militia infamous for their role in killing civilians during Guatemala’s civil war, are being recruited in large numbers to violent Mexican drug gangs.
We can go on like this with similar stories for Chile, El Salvador, etc. And support for undemocratic regimes and practices, under the rubric of the war on drugs, continues to this day in places like Colombia, where we’ve supported atrocities by paramilitaries and government lawlessness, and in Honduras, where the Obama administration has supported the coup regime which is cracking down hard on the population. So where does Obama get off complaining about Cuba’s prospective inclusion in regional diplomacy?
As Latin American countries turn more and more to China, the words and belligerence of American and Canadian leaders have less and less importance. Perhaps the Latin American countries would be better off creating a new summit that excludes Gringolandia, so they can come to agreements without dictatorial interference.
Since the Republican and Democrat-controlled federal government is behind a lot of the illegal drug trade in the world they are never going to agree with legalization.
If Mexico and the countries of Central, and South America want to legalize drugs then they are going to have to wean themselves off of Uncle Sammy’s teat, man up and do it and damn the consequences.
Ehud Barack Obomba never says what he means. He said he would end the embargo against Cuba and hasn't done that. He said he would bring peace to the Middle East and South Asia and hasn't done that and he's continuing the Cold War. He's continuing the war on drugs and isn't winning. He lectures enemies and not allies about human rights.
The CIA controls world drug trade to finance it's covert operations worldwide. They can bypass the need for funding from Congress and avoid any oversight that would involve by laundering drug trade profits. They would be outraged if any US President did anything to upset this scheme and would probably assassinate him.
I'm not sure that Obama is lying. He is a great president and has been true to his word.
This is a very informative article. I was looking for these things and here I found it. I am doing a project and this information is very useful me. If you are interested, but this is my duty to inform you that virtual administrative assistant a very dedicated service and can be applied anywhere you want and get better results.