Deploying Troops to Jordan: Asking For It?

John Glaser, October 10, 2012

With the news that more than 150 US forces have been deployed to Jordan, in part to “be positioned” as a contingent force “should the turmoil in Syria expand into a wider conflict,” it’s important to note the risk involved. As the New York Times reported:

American officials familiar with the operation said the mission also includes drawing up plans to try to insulate Jordan, an important American ally in the region, from the upheaval in Syria and to avoid the kind of clashes now occurring along the border of Syria and Turkey.

…The Obama administration has declined to intervene in the Syrian conflict beyond providing communications equipment and other nonlethal assistance to the rebels opposing the government of President Bashar al-Assad. But the outpost near Amman could play a broader role should American policy change. It is less than 35 miles from the Syrian border and is the closest American military presence to the conflict.

Carrying out contingent operations in Jordan could have serious implications for a conflict down the road. Washington seems concerned about the outbreak of war beyond Syria’s borders, but even if skirmishes crop up along the Jordanian border as they have along the Turkish border, it doesn’t necessarily mean international war will break out. However, if US forces are there and ready to jump the gun, it might.

Small skirmishes with Syria’s neighbors are not desirable, but nor would it threaten the US, so its a wonder why President Obama sees fit to send US troops to Jordan, especially when its technically done in secret (the Pentagon would not acknowledge the mission, or comment on it, nor will the administration) and without the approval of Congress.

This deployment reminds me of the major US-led military exercise in Jordan this past May. At the time, Michael Eisenstadt, director of the Military and Security Studies program at the Washington Institute for Near East Studies, said he “suspect[ed] they’re trying to get kind of a psychological operations bump by [publicizing] this exercise now; it puts more pressure on the regime in Syria.”

And Michael Rubin, an adviser to former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld from 2002-2004 and now an analyst at the American Enterprise Institute said the exercise was meant to reassure America’s puppet dictators that we have their back. “One of the perceptions we’re trying to reverse is the perception among many of the Gulf monarchs, and the king of Jordan, that we dumped Hosni Mubarak way too quickly.”

“What this does is send a signal to many of the GCC states that we’re not simply going to turn our backs on all the monarchs,” Rubin says. Building this kind of military-to-military relationship with allied Middle Eastern dictatorships “is an important check against Iran’s military ambitions, and has been a US goal since the 1980s,” he added.

Addendum: Just to add, it’s worth remembering that the US has CIA teams on the ground in Turkey, right on the Syrian border, and they are helping organize and support Syrian rebel fighters, along with our ally in Ankara. If this contingent force in Jordan does anything of the sort, Damascus will feel surrounded and deliberately subverted. How is this not a provocation?




30 Responses to “Deploying Troops to Jordan: Asking For It?”

  1. This is correct. Clearly the US is using the "humanitarian" issue as a cover for covert ops from Jordan, and since these guys are described as "planners", one might guess they are also "planning" military action against Syria as soon as the US can get Turkey to start the war and invite NATO in.

  2. Well, I don't know. What's the position of La Merkel and Monsieur Hollande on intervention? … don't they have their hands full with the economy? Fogh Rasmussen spouting political inanities as usual doesn't tell me much.

  3. We can't have this distraction! Iran is still the boogeymen of the middle east and Israel is watching the minute hand countdown to that 'nukuler' midnight they've been foretelling since 1984.

    The elections are bad enough but, as soon as that smoke screen clears, we don't need to find ourselves tied down in a Syrian conflict – although it should be all over by Christmas.

    On Dasher and Dancer and Prancer and crew it's off to the mullahs for the whole lot of u!

  4. Why does anybody cite anybody who cites the American Enterprise Institute? Even its name is bogus, an obvious intent to defraud..

  5. I appeal to all troops to pull a Vietnam, put down your weaponsvandbrefuse to enlist. You soldiers are not fighting for America, but Wall Street and the away Profiteers. While you are over there your houses are being repossessed by greedy Bankers. Only when people refuse to "kill they Fellow Man", will the wars end.

  6. I wanted to thank you for this special read.I have also bookmarked you for checking out new posts.

  7. Aren't they also fighting for the "glory and honor" of Obomber, Biden, Clinton/Clinton, Cantor, Pelosi, Albright, Rice/Rice, King, Ryan, Cheney, Bush, Romney, and all the other rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth interventionist war dogs….? "See how we keep you safe? Kill and die for me and for your country — reelect me, me, me!" they say.

  8. Clearly the Syrians need an alternate route to the oceans of the world for their rowboats equipped with WMDs, and Aqaba, Jordan on the Red Sea is perfect for this. They are sure those Americans won't know what hit them. I feel safer here just thinking of those brave lads near Amman, Mr. Rumsfeld, and Condippy Rice looking out for us. Those Syrians are Muslims you know, just like those New York terrorists. Now, where are my pills? I have to get back to my job in Military Intelligence.

  9. Amman could play a broader role should American policy change. It is less than 35 miles from the Syrian border and is the closest American military presence to the conflict.

  10. the irony noted

    but then what happens when the arab spring uprising unravels the hashemite royalty. Jordan as an ally goes the way of 'our' mubarak

  11. With the news that more than 150 US forces have been deployed to Jordan, in part to “be positioned” as a contingent force “should the turmoil in Syria expand into a wider conflict,” it’s important to note the risk involved. As the New York Times reported:sports limousine

  12. Bon personnel sont l'épine dorsale de toute entreprise prospère. Malheureusement, trop souvent, j'entends des gens se plaindre de leurs problèmes de personnel et ne voient pas ses points positifs.
    jg wentworth scam

  13. Chaque entreprise devrait avoir un bon matériel promotionnel. Il n'est pas rare, brochures et dépliants ont lieu le premier point de contact des clients potentiels. Si le matériel promotionnel ne pas les inciter à utiliser votre entreprise, les deux milieux est tout aussi futile.
    220 license

  14. There are many people who do not realize that the location where he was already besieged by the enemy. There are many soldiers who already know the location of this should they occupy.college moving

  15. I wonder what is the reason for the war, I was always confused as to why the war between Iran and Israel is never ending. In fact there should be a solution that can be done to battle this does not happen again. Free Dharma Talk MP3s

  16. All the reasons for the war it was the wrong thing. You can avoid this by asking the right reasons first source on them all. You need proper reasons.

  17. If you do not understand why there are a lot of people to war, then you should not be asking the wrong person. There are many mistakes made by many people.online forensic psychology degree

  18. You who have the question of why there are still many countries that a war can be asked on this site. Everyone expressed freely and openly question.kidkraft toddler bed

  19. The war that made ??many people suffer should be stopped quickly. You can use many kinds of best and strong reasons why it should be a war.marketing android app

  20. Syrians became one of the countries that still have problems to this day. All the soldiers who were there had a lot of down to help resolve this issue.

  21. You are very happy with the many conflicts that exist in a particular country really want there country devastated. The proof there is no single country that really care about the situation there.wedding tiaras

  22. Many problems solved by many countries with many troops should not use violence. You need a lot of types of measures are more effective.Anchorage Carpet Cleaning Service

  23. Using Troops to be a major problem in the country is difficult. You need a lot of the best strategies to be in a safe position in the country.repairphoenixgaragedoor.com

  24. This is one of the steps and strategies that fairly effective. There are times when the troops have to deploy because of some particular random.

  25. | If you have not been prescribed an allergy medicine, Zyrtec and Claritin are good allergy medicines and are available over the counter. Benadryl works really well depending on how severe they are, however there is the down side of it making you drowsy.

  26. The best blog always in th? nh?a serves information regarding products ads

  27. Atopar información sobre os competidores non é difícil. Pode contactar directamente a empresa, ler os anuncios que empregan, pregunta a amigos e familiares que xa están usando estas empresas e preguntar como atopar os servizos que reciben.
    alaska fishing

  28. Bring the troops was great to be there in another country different from the country of origin and is a big challenge. You can give commands to people there.Collision Seattle

  29. Als je niet aantrekkelijk op een praktische uniform zien er, zou je ook niet de juiste boodschap te sturen naar klanten. Uniformen wel de neiging om de kosten, maar als een marketing tool, kunt u deze aanpassen volgens uw budget.
    Seattle Vacation Rentals

  30. You are every reason, every hope, and every dream I've ever had, and no matter what happens to us in the future, everyday we are together is the greatest day of my life. I will always be yours.