The National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) amounts to a sweeping database housing information and surveillance records of people the government suspects have ties to terrorism. It is a horrendous monstrosity of Orwellian proportions.
And it just got worse. As a meager restriction on its assault on the Fourth Amendment, the NCTC, was previously supposed to immediately destroy intelligence information about Americans when there were no clear ties to terrorism. But now, the Obama administration – without any public debate or transparency with Congress – has granted new powers to the NCTC.
The rules now allow the little-known National Counterterrorism Center to examine the government files of U.S. citizens for possible criminal behavior, even if there is no reason to suspect them. That is a departure from past practice, which barred the agency from storing information about ordinary Americans unless a person was a terror suspect or related to an investigation.
Now, NCTC can copy entire government databases—flight records, casino-employee lists, the names of Americans hosting foreign-exchange students and many others. The agency has new authority to keep data about innocent U.S. citizens for up to five years, and to analyze it for suspicious patterns of behavior. Previously, both were prohibited. Data about Americans “reasonably believed to constitute terrorism information” may be permanently retained.
The changes also allow databases of U.S. civilian information to be given to foreign governments for analysis of their own. In effect, U.S. and foreign governments would be using the information to look for clues that people might commit future crimes.
“It’s breathtaking” in its scope, said a former senior administration official familiar with the White House debate.
How does the Obama administration justify this radical Orwellian approach to domestic surveillance? With a promise and a kiss. The President seems to think any government measure, no matter how unconstitutional, is perfectly acceptable so long as this meaningless stipulation is uttered along with it: “Counterterrorism officials say they will be circumspect with the data,” the WSJ reports. “The guidelines provide rigorous oversight to protect the information that we have, for authorized and narrow purposes,” says Alexander Joel, Civil Liberties Protection Officer for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. In other words: we promise we’ll be good.
There were murmurs about this news way back in March. “Following the failed terrorist attack in December 2009, representatives of the counterterrorism community concluded it is vital for NCTC to be provided with a variety of datasets from various agencies that contain terrorism information,” Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said in a statement late Thursday. “The ability to search against these datasets for up to five years on a continuing basis as these updated guidelines permit will enable NCTC to accomplish its mission more practically and effectively.”
Blogger Marcy Wheeler wrote at the time that “To justify this power grab,” advocates “point to two attacks that had nothing to do with the length of data retention: the Nidal Hasan attack, in which information on his conversations with Anwar al-Awlaki hadn’t been shared throughout the government, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, in which his suspect status hadn’t been loaded into the no-fly list.”
“They don’t, however, point to a concrete example where 5 year old data of US persons might have helped solve an actual terror attack,” she added. In other words, the government is using examples of its past failings to justify more surveillance powers.
“It is a vast expansion of the government’s surveillance authority,” said Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center. “Total Information Awareness appears to be reconstructing itself,” Rotenberg said, referring to the Defense Department’s post-9/11 intelligence program that was killed in 2003 because of privacy concerns.
The Bush administration’s attempt to vastly expand the government’s surveillance authority was met with considerable resistance from the public and from Democrats. Not now, though. The difference with the Obama administration’s tyranny is twofold. The first: he is a Democrat, and the Republican Party isn’t about to check him on this score (nor is his own party). The second is perhaps more important, and the WSJ explains it perfectly: “For one thing, the debate happened behind closed doors.”
Oh, I wonder what other government the US will share all this information about us with and let them do an analysis of their own? And what will the US do with conclusions reached by unsaid foreign government? Are we really getting to the point where the US will detain and assassinate US citizen based on a secret analysis by a foreign government on secret grounds that bear no relevance to US interests? Sounds like it. If a certain government wants you eliminated for their own purposes, your own beloved government will do the dirty work and you won't even know what happened. How much worse can it get?
Need we even imagine who this secret government is?
The Bush administration’s attempt to vastly expand the government’s surveillance authority was met with considerable resistance from the public and from Democrats. Not now, though.
http://www.mikebjohnson.com/
If a certain government wants you eliminated for their own purposes, your own beloved government will do the dirty work and you won't even know what happened. How much worse can it get?
“They don’t, however, point to a concrete example where 5 year old data of US persons might have helped solve an actual terror attack,” she added. In other words, the government is using examples of its past failings to justify more surveillance powers.
hello police state! the increasing surveilance, and militarization of law enforcement, combined with the undermining of individual freedoms and rights since 9-11, the states is slowly transforming into an authoritarian regime, unless americans wake up and smell the humus!
Big Brother IS watching you.
But now, the Obama administration – without any public debate or transparency with Congress – has granted new powers to the NCTC.
Just a necessary periodic reminder: Barack Obama did NOT grant "powers" of any kind, as he has none of his own to grant. His merely served here as the figurehead, the hand puppet up whose arse the hand of the MIC-Bankster establishment is ensconced , for their own self-conferred power enhancement.
How does the Obama administration justify this radical Orwellian approach to domestic surveillance? With a promise and a kiss.
And a promise to be very good (after all, it's almost Christmas!)
Why does everyone think that they are asking?
They are “telling” of an already accomplished act.
What next; a Committee to pass a bill limiting them to no more than what they now have?
What and the hell makes people think we live under a government where the people can administer the checks and balances that existed two hundred years ago?
Every tech advancemt in data collection is already under some government control.
There is no real private ownership of information. And soon every home computer will not have much more than an operating system as new cloud tech places it one data base a data base that every software manufacture and IP has already given access to our intel agencys.
Intrpol has been embeded in our intell community for years.
The huge facility in UTAH can already monitor and store all telecommunications not just in US but most of world, no matter your didget numbers of security. It also automaticly trsnslates.
Thete are plans for even three larger and higher tech to be built in US and rumors of one other already on line hidden.
If they want they can at flick of a few switches and tapping of keys eliminate your ever being or isolate you from anyone elses knowledge of your being
We live in a “We” or “Brave New World” that we are no more than digets on a programed disc.
USA needs a third Party, a People's Party not bought and paid for by this foreign government established on high jacked Property bordering the Mediterainian.
“Total Information Awareness appears to be reconstructing itself…”
Thats a good one. As if it was ever gone.
Just a Statement "SCRIPT", nothing more than that..
very blog good adminsasdasd
hat communities divert law enforcement resources from violent crimes to illegal drug offenses, the risk of punishment for engaging i
sadivert law enforcement resources from violent crimes to illegal drug offenses, the risk of punishment for engaging i
call when you get drunk in Riyadh. You don't get a great job at an influence mill with that on your résumé. You do if Ambassador to Saudi Arabia means what doing the "important work" needed under current policies.
Graet!
It is a horrendous monstrosity of Orwellian proportions.Unprecedented Powers for Warrant less Surveillance
I hope,Obama gave the right justice to people and provide the best work. Please let me know about the complete information here.
C?n s?t giàn ph?i qu?n áo
Không gian ch?t h?p khi?n nhi?u h? gia ?ình ph?i b?ng kho?n lo l?ng khi s?p x?p không gian nhà ? m?t cách h?p lý. gian phoi do
?ây c?ng là n?i lo chung c?a nhi?u ng??i trong cu?c s?ng hi?n ??i, ??c bi?t là nh?ng ai sinh s?ng trong các ?ô th?. Không ch? mang l?i ti?n ích, các s?n ph?m nh? gian phoi qu?n áo thông minh hay t? âm t??ng còn ?em l?i s? thông thoáng cho không gian gia ?ình b?n và ph?n nào tô ?i?m c?n nhà c?a b?n. V?i nhi?u ng??i Vi?t Nam, giàn ph?i thông minh còn khá xa l? nh?ng v?i nh?ng n??c phát tri?n nh? các n??c ? B?c M? và ?ông Âu thì s?n ph?m này ?ã tr? nên quen thu?c và ???c r?t nhi?u ng??i s? d?ng. giàn ph?i thông minh&
Nh? nghiên c?u và t?n d?ng các công ngh? hi?n ??i, giàn ph?i ?? thông minh ?ã ???c ra ??i sao cho v?a hi?n ??i, v?a ti?n l?i nh?ng v?n g?n gàng và d? s? d?ng. giàn ph?i thông minh
?u ?i?m b?c nh?t c?a giàn ph?i ?? thông minh là ti?t ki?m không gian, ?i?u mà m?i gia ?ình trong cu?c s?ng càng ngày càng ?ông ?úc, nhà c?a càng thu h?p l?i ?ang r?t c?n. gian phoi
Nói v? ?? ti?n d?ng thì không ai có th? ph? nh?n r?ng giàn ph?i thông minh là s?n ph?m c?n nh?t cho m?i gia ?ình hi?n nay. Không nh?ng ti?t ki?m ???c không gian s?ng, giàn ph?i còn giúp m?i ng??i thoát kh?i d? b?n lòng v? m?t m? qu?n áo ? ??ng không có ch? thông thoáng ?? ph?i móc. giàn ph?i ??
Dân s? th? gi?i hi?n nay ?ang t?ng v?i t?c ?? nhanh và còn ti?p t?c t?ng trong nh?ng n?m s?p t?i. Chính vì v?y, c?nh ??t ch?t ng??i ?ông ?ang ngày càng tr? nên ph? bi?n, ??c bi?t là t?i các n??c ?ang phát tri?n và phát tri?n. Trong s? ?ó, t?p trung nhi?u nh?t ? các thành ph? hay khu v?c có ?i?u ki?n thu?n l?i cho kinh t? phát tri?n. Di?n tích sinh ho?t c?a ng??i dân b? thu h?p. giàn ph?i
Không ít ng??i ph?i s?ng trong nh?ng c?n h? ch?t nít và bé tí. M?i ho?t ??ng ?? duy trì cu?c s?ng bình th??ng c?ng c?n ph?i s?p x?p không gian sao cho h?p lý và hi?u qu?. Tr??c th?c tr?ng nh? hi?n nay, giàn ph?i qu?n áo thông minh ???c thi?t k? và ra ??i ?? giúp khách hàng ti?t ki?m không gian sinh s?ng sao cho phù h?p nh?t. ?ây c?ng là m?t ch?n l?a nh?m gi?i quy?t không gian ph?i qu?n áo trong gia ?ình ?ang ???c ?ông ??o khách hàng tin dùng. gian phoi
|
your résumé. You do if Ambassador to Saudi Arabia means what doing the "important work" needed under current policies
Không ph?i ai ? Hà N?i c?ng có th? bi?t h?t nh?ng ??a ?i?m thú v? và h?p d?n n?i b?n và c? gia ?ình có th? có nh?ng phút giây th? giãn. H?n n?a, không ph?i ??a ?i?m nào c?ng có m?c giá và ?i?u ki?n h?p lí ?úng theo ý mu?n c?a b?n. Sau ?ây là vài ??a ch? khu ngh? d??ng g?n hà n?i v?i ch?t l??ng và giá c? h?p d?n b?n có th? tham kh?o cho mùa hè s?p ??n.khu ngh? d??ng g?n hà n?i
Ngoài ra, v?i h? th?ng ki?n trúc hi?n ??i, m?t b? su?i khoáng nóng c?c kì tinh khi?t và s?ch s? là ?i?m nh?n cho khu du l?ch ??c ?áo. V resort c?ng là m?t tòa ki?n trúc ??p, g?n g?i thiên nhiên. Bao g?m nh?ng ti?n nghi ??y ?? nh? spa, nhà sàn, hay phòng gym và t?t t?n t?t nh?ng ph??ng ti?n gi?i trí mà b?n có th? d? dàng tìm th?ykhu resort g?n hà n?i
Chúng tôi l?a ch?n s? 1 cho làm sáng da trong n?m 2014 là Lux chuyên sâu. Làm sáng da tuy?t v?i này ???c th?c hi?n v?i các thành ph?n ch?t l??ng cao nh?t. Lux công trình chuyên sâu ?? thay ??i s? xu?t hi?n c?a da mà không ?nh h??ng ??n c?u trúc ho?c ch?c n?ng da
kem d??ng da nào t?t nh?t
.Nó ?i kèm v?i m?t ti?n 90 ngày tr? l?i ??m b?o và b?n có th? nh?n ???c m?t ngu?n cung c?p 30 ngày cho ít h?n $ 35 khi b?n mua gói giá tr?.
kem d??ng da t?t nh?t
H? hi?n c?ng ?ang cung c?p mi?n phí v?n chuy?n trên t?t c? các ??n ??t hàng trong n??c. Click vào ?ây ?? truy c?p vào các trang web chính th?c Lux chuyên sâu
kem d??ng da nào t?t
Liverpool v Norwich: cách cá ?? bóng ?á trên m?ng A Different Perspective
Yesterday I got to take my son to his first ever match at Anfield and he loved the experience. He got to see the trophies, met Mighty Red and saw some players arrive (although he wasn’t impressed with Jose Enrique – “He can’t be any good Daddy, he’s forgot his kit”).
He even managed to pay attention for the whole match which I was impressed with, especially as I nearly gave up as Milner tried to recreate the unforgettable Iago Aspas moment for the fifth time. However he did come up with a few gems when the match was on which made it much more entertaining:
“What happens if cá ?? bóng ?á tr?c tuy?n uy tin they kick the ball out of the stadium?”
“Why doesn’t our goalie like passing it to our players?”
“Why don’t they ever pass it forwards like we’re taught to?”
and best of all…
“Daddy, what is a w*nker?”
I’m now dreading what he’s going to say in school today.
Mike, LFC, Cardiff
Convert your knowledge and passion for Formula One into hard cash, by developing a sound betting strategy for the sport. With twenty races and many additional days of qualifying throughout the season, Formula One provides the sports bettor with many superb opportunities to take the chequered flag. Keith Collantine, editor of one of the world's leading các trang cá c??c bóng ?á Formula One websites F1 Fanatic, lays out some crucial information which will help you devise a sound betting strategy for Formula One.
The race weekend
A Formula One race is very different to most sporting contests. Football, rugby, cricket, tennis and many other popular sports are all one-versus-one affairs and there are only three possible outcomes: a win for either side or a draw.
But in Formula One 20 competitors line up for each race, which means there are a staggering 2,432,902,008,176,640,000 different combinations of finishing results for a race. That can offer opportunities for gamblers, but the sheer complexity of this fast-paced and fast-changing sport can also be a headache.
Practice
The track action begins with two 90-minute practice sessions on Friday (Thursday in Monaco). kèo bóng ?á tr?c tuy?n hôm nay These count for nothing for the competitors and are best avoided from a betting point of view, but in terms of what they can teach you about the performance of each car and driver they are very valuable.
However you should always keep in mind that as each car's fuel level and therefore weight is unknown, there is always a degree of uncertainty over the performance being seen. Some teams habitually run further off their pace in the first practice sessions – Williams usually do, for example.
Best Formula Bookmakers
Chosing a top bookmaker is a crucial part of building a winning Formula One betting strategy. ty le ca cuoc bong da anh truc tuyen There are many exceptional welcome offers worth checking out and also look at the opportunities provided by various bookmakers for live in-play betting. Here at bettingexpert we have conducted all of this research for you. All you need to do is have a look at the table below and click through to the comprehensive reviews provided by our research team.
Left out of the side by Brendan Rodgers tip mien phi hang ngay for the 1-1 draw against Norwich, now might be a good time for Gomez to catch his breath away from the glare of the spotlight. It will also allow him to impress Liverpool’s coaches in a central kèo cá c??c defensive role, a position he prefers.
“At the end of the day I see myself as a centre-back and in years to come that is where I hope to play,” said Gomez on September 4. “At the moment I just have to learn and be grateful to play where I can and use it as a stepping-stone to be the best cá ?? ?á banh trên m?ng centre-back I can be.”
Level-headed and humble, we say good luck to him.
máy l?nh daikin t?t không
máy l?nh daikin 2 ngua
máy l?nh daikin 2hp inverter
máy l?nh daikin inverter 2 ng?a
máy l?nh daikin inverter 1hp ftkd25gvmv
máy l?nh daikin b? ch?y n??c
máy l?nh panasonic 2hp
máy l?nh panasonic inverter 1hp
máy l?nh panasonic inverter 2015
máy l?nh panasonic cu/cs-s9rkh-8
máy l?nh panasonic 1 5hp
máy l?nh panasonic inverter 1.5hp
máy l?nh 1 c?c toshiba
có nên mua máy l?nh toshiba
máy l?nh di d?ng toshiba
máy l?nh toshiba inverter noi dia
máy l?nh toshiba tiet kiem dien
s? d?ng máy l?nh toshiba
máy l?nh sharp xp10lw
máy l?nh sharp x25new
máy l?nh sanyo inverter 1hp
máy l?nh sanyo inverter
may lanh toshiba 1.5 ngua
máy l?nh toshiba 1 5hp inverter
may lanh toshiba 1 ngua nguyen kim
may lanh toshiba 2 ngua inverter
may lanh toshiba 2 ngua gia bao nhieu
may lanh toshiba 2hp
may lanh toshiba 2 5hp
máy l?nh toshiba 2 chi?u
may lanh toshiba 2 ngua tiet kiem dien
máy ?i?u hòa toshiba 2 chi?u
máy ?i?u hòa toshiba 2 ng?a
gia may lanh toshiba 2 ngua
may lanh toshiba bao loi
máy l?nh toshiba báo ?èn filter
may lanh toshiba bi chay nuoc
may lanh toshiba bien hoa
may lanh toshiba gia bao nhieu
may lanh toshiba 1.5hp gia bao nhieu
may lanh toshiba 1 ngua bao nhieu tien
ban may lanh toshiba cu
block máy l?nh toshiba
ban may lanh toshiba
bo mach may lanh toshiba
? Máy ?i?u hòa Sanyo 1 ng?a có ?? mát? – hay máy l?nh Sanyo 1HP v?i công su?t t??ng ???ng 9000BTU/h. V?i công su?t trên máy có th? ?áp ?ng ???c nhu c?u cho các phòng có di?n tích nh? t? kho?ng 10 ?ên 15 mét vuông. Vì n?u l?n h?n s? không ?? l?nh và th?m chí máy nhanh h?ng do lúc nào c?ng ph?i ho?t ??ng liên t?c v?i t?ng su?t cao. máy l?nh sanyo 1hp ? ?i?u ??u tiên khi mua máy l?nh b?n nên xác ??nh di?n tích phòng c?a mình vào kho?ng bao nhiêu m2; tr?n nhà cao hay th?p t? ?ó l?a ch?n công su?t máy l?nh phù h?p. ?i?u này là do n?u phòng b?n r?ng nh?ng ch?n máy Sanyo có công su?t ch? 1 ng?a thì s? không ??. Thêm n?a n?u b?n ch?n nhi?t ?? quá th?p máy 1HP ho?t ??ng li?n t?c v??t m?c qui ??nh gây t?n ?i?n và tu?i th? máy gi?m may lanh sanyo 1 5hp inverter ? Ng??c l?i n?u phòng b?n nh? nh?ng ch?n máy công su?t quá l?n c?ng không phù h?p. Tuy máy s? ho?t ??ng tr?n tru và làm l?nh nhanh h?n nh?ng vì máy l?n nên t?n ?i?n h?n, giá thành cao c?ng cao h?n khá nhi?u. ???c cái máy s? ch?y ?n ??nh h?n, nói vui thì g?i nó là ch?y tèn tèn c?ng lên. may lanh sanyo 1.5 ngua ? Quay l?i v?n ?? máy l?nh Sanyo 1HP là ?? cho m?t không gian nh? nh? phòng ng? ch?ng h?n. Còn v?i phòng khách thì nên ch?n máy công su?t cao h?n. V?i công su?t này b?n nên ch?n máy có công ngh? Inverter ti?t ki?m ?i?n n?ng tiêu th? ?? gi?m chi phí ?i?n nha. Th??ng thì máy có inverter s? ??c h?n máy th??ng c?ng nhi?u ?ó. Nh?ng ch? 1HP thì ch?c c?ng không ?áng k? là m?y. may lanh sanyo bao loi h6 ? Tôi có m?t ng??i b?n ch?n mua máy 9000BTU/h t??ng ???ng 1 ng?a cho phòng khách r?ng 30m2 c?a mình. Máy này là máy Inverter ?àng hoàng nh?ng ??n cu?i tháng bill ?i?n c?ng m?t m?i luôn. B?n tôi nói t??ng Inverter không tiêu t?n nhi?u ?i?n n?ng ch? ai dè t?n d?. B?n ?y còn nói r?ng qu?ng cáo cho l?m vào nh?ng toàn sai s? th?t. may lanh sanyo 1 ngua gia bao nhieu ? Th?t ra do b?n ?y không hi?u nên nói nh? v?y ch? máy ?i?u hòa Sanyo 1 ng?a mà ??t phòng r?ng v?y thì tr? trách t?n ?i?n. Nó gi?ng nh? b?n cao có 1m1 mà ?òi b? trái xoài cách m?t ??t 3m v?y. Luôn luôn v?i ?? b? xu?ng nh?ng hoài không b? ???c. Còn máy l?nh c?ng th? thôi luôn luôn làm vi?c h?t công su?t k?t qu? v?n không mát, máy ch?y nóng nên ??m b?o r?ng dùng 1 th?i gian là ?i toi. =))
? Máy l?nh Sharp có b?n không v?y m?i ng??i? – Theo nh? mình ???c bi?t máy l?nh Sharp là s?n ph?m ??n t? Nh?t B?n th??ng hi?u g?n li?n v?i 2 ch? "Nh?t B?n" nghe là thích r?i. Nh?ng ch?a ???c tr?i nghi?m may lanh Sharp th?c s? nên không bi?t có b?n không? Mình c?ng ít th?y qu?ng cáo trên các ph??ng ti?n thông tin ??i chúng. Các th??ng hi?u máy l?nh ???c nghe qu?ng cáo nhi?u là máy l?nh Panasonic, máy l?nh Toshiba, máy l?nh Daikin… hi
may lanh sharp 1hp inverter nguyen kim
? Theo thông tin mình tìm hi?u trên m?ng may lanh Sharp ???c nh?p kh?u nguyên si t? Thái gi? nguyên hình nguyên ki?n nên ??m b?o m?i 100% không b? bóc tem hihi. Tuy không t?p trung Pr nhi?u cho s?n ph?m c?a mình nh? các hãng khác nh?ng uy tín th??ng hi?u ?ã ??y ng??i dùng tìm ??n s? d?ng s?n ph?m r?t nhi?u ng??i tiêu dùng ch?n l?a s? d?ng
may lanh sharp 1.5hp
? Máy l?nh Sharp có 3 dòng s?n ph?m chính: dòng ph? thông, dòng ti?t ki?m ?i?n inverter và dòng cao c?p inverter
Dòng có ch? A ??u là dòng thông th??ng. Tuy v?y v?n ?áp ?ng ???c m?t s? tác v? c?n thi?t cho nhu c?u c?a ng??i tiêu dùng ch? là không có tính n?ng bi?n t?n ti?t ki?m ?i?n thôi
Dòng có ch? cái ??u X là dòng s?n ph?m bi?n t?n ti?t ki?m ?i?n thay vì dùng r? le thay ??i c?m bi?n nhi?t ??.
Dòng XP là dòng cao c?p nh?t (super inverter) ngoài ti?t ki?m ?i?n t?i ?a còn có thêm di?t khu?n, kh? mùi b?o v? s?c kh?e ng??i tiêu dùng.
may lanh sharp x12sew
??u ?i?m máy l?nh Sharp : Mâ?u ma? nhi?n thoa?ng qua co? thê? bi? lâ?m t???ng la? ha?ng cu?a National (tên tr???c cu?a Panasonic). Châ?t l???ng râ?t tô?t, mâ?u ma? ?e?p, gia? tha?nh kha? re?. Làm l?nh c?c nhanh gi?i t?a c?n nóng trong nh?ng ngày oi b?c. Máy l?nh Sharp làm l?nh nhanh và ch?y r?t êm.
may lanh sharp noi dia
Nh??c ?i?m c?a máy l?nh Sharp : – M??c du? Sharp co? châ?t l???ng tô?t, va? gia? tha?nh kha? re?, nh?ng do i?t qua?ng ba? vê? ma?y la?nh, nên i?t ng???i biê?t ?ê?n. – Do là hàng nh?p kh?u t? Thái Lan và s? l??ng tiêu th? ít nên hàng Sharp khi nh?p v? Vi?t Nam th??ng hay b? th?i gian l?u kho khá lâu so v?i các hãng khác.
may lanh sharp nguyen kim
Vì v?y phi?u b?o hành Sharp th??ng hay b? h?t th?i gian b?o hành và c?n ph?i ???c dán tem gia h?n khi ??n tay ng??i tiêu dùng.