Declassified: US Government Colluded With Big Banks to Monitor, Disrupt Occupy Protesters as ‘Criminal Threats’

John Glaser, January 01, 2013

According to recently released documents, the federal government monitored the Occupy Wall Street movement from its very inception, internally referring to it as a potential criminal and terrorist threat despite acknowledging the movement’s explicit rejection of violent forms of protest.

Via BoingBoing’s Xeni Jardin, the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request documents that “reveal that from its inception, the FBI treated the Occupy movement as a potential criminal and terrorist threat even though the agency acknowledges in documents that organizers explicitly called for peaceful protest and did ‘not condone the use of violence’ at occupy protests.”

This is yet another example of how the federal government often views peaceful political activism as a threat, even a “terrorist” threat, and thus engages in covert surveillance and even physical aggression against them.

In October, the Senate Homeland Security subcommittee reviewed more than 600 reports that had come out of domestic surveillance centers and found that the government spy networks snooped on political activists and infiltrated groups that were peacefully exercising their constitutional rights to free speech, as opposed to fighting terrorist threats.

“The centers have made headlines for circulating information about Ron Paul supporters, the ACLU, activists on both sides of the abortion debate, war protesters and advocates of gun rights,” according to the Associated Press.

The FBI caught flack last year too when a massive probe into antiwar activists was revealed, as this Washington Post article explained:

The search was part of a mysterious, ongoing nationwide terrorism investigation with an unusual target: prominent peace activists and politically active labor organizers.

…The apparent targets, all vocal and visible critics of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East and South America, deny any ties to terrorism. They say the government, using its post-9/11 focus on terrorism as a pretext, is targeting them for their political views.

They are “public non-violent activists with long, distinguished careers in public service, including teachers, union organizers and antiwar and community leaders,” said Michael Deutsch, a Chicago lawyer and part of a legal team defending those who believe they are being targeted by the investigation.

The documents obtained by PCJF are even more revealing than that, though. They show that the federal government cooperated with local law enforcement and major financial institutions of the kind Occupy was protesting against in order to crack down on the peaceful activism. Jardin:

According to the PCJF, the papers show the government partnered in this crackdown effort with financial institutions through the Domestic Security Alliance Council, an entity created by the FBI in 2005 that “enhances communications and promotes the timely and bidirectional effective exchange of information keeping the nation’s critical infrastructure safe, secure and resilient.”

And here is PCJF:

The PCJF has obtained heavily redacted documents showing that FBI offices and agents around the country were in high gear conducting surveillance against the movement even as early as August 2011, a month prior to the establishment of the OWS encampment in Zuccotti Park and other Occupy actions around the country.

“This production, which we believe is just the tip of the iceberg, is a window into the nationwide scope of the FBI’s surveillance, monitoring, and reporting on peaceful protestors organizing with the Occupy movement,” stated Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, Executive Director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF).  “These documents show that the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are treating protests against the corporate and banking structure of America as potential criminal and terrorist activity.  These documents also show these federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America.”

“The documents are heavily redacted, and it is clear from the production that the FBI is withholding far more material. We are filing an appeal challenging this response and demanding full disclosure to the public of the records of this operation,” stated Heather Benno, staff attorney with the PCJF.

Read the bullet point summaries at the PCJF site for a fuller understanding of how big banks colluded with big government to monitor and disrupt the Occupy movement. The FOIA’d documents can be read here.

Update: The New York Times has picked up the story, reporting that the FBI “used counterterrorism agents to investigate the Occupy Wall Street movement, including its communications and planning.”  The emphasis here is important: note how the war on terrorism – presumably as far removed from a young semi-anarchist movement decrying the bankers’ state-granted privileges as can be imagined – is used as a blanket excuse for the government to control and suppress American citizens. Post-9/11 powers granted to the state in the context of fighting small groups of Arab Muslim militants plotting terrorist attacks against the US, are instead used to target politically active American citizens who have literally zero relation or connection to anything resembling “terrorists.”

The FBI apparently released a statement on the FOIA’d documents:

A spokesman for the F.B.I. in Washington cautioned against “drawing conclusions from redacted” documents.

“The F.B.I. recognizes the rights of individuals and groups to engage in constitutionally protected activity,” said the spokesman, Paul Bresson. “While the F.B.I. is obligated to thoroughly investigate any serious allegations involving threats of violence, we do not open investigations based solely on First Amendment activity. In fact, the Department of Justice and the F.B.I.’s own internal guidelines on domestic operations strictly forbid that.”

But Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, said the documents demonstrated that the F.B.I. had acted improperly by gathering information on Americans involved in lawful activities.

As is the case with virtually all cases of government surveillance of American citizens, we’re asked to trust that the spies possess a deep respect for the law, and observe it accordingly. Redactions and all.




34 Responses to “Declassified: US Government Colluded With Big Banks to Monitor, Disrupt Occupy Protesters as ‘Criminal Threats’”

  1. No Shit —– so you're saying that the government works for the wealthy and considers any threat to established wealth as a threat to the government itself – as if that has been the standard deal since mankind got up on two legs!

  2. Excellent roundup, John. Luckily, as a result of spending cuts mandated by the 'fiscal cliff" deal, the feds will no waste $ on such activities.

  3. A real shock-inducer, ain't it? The true horror is that there are actually some so-called "adult" human beings out there that would find this surprising.

  4. I am looking forward to reading your article US Government Colluded With Big Banks to Monitor and read other posts soon.

  5. Surprised CNN, MSBC, FOX et al would not zero in on this outrage. They are part of the slow erosion of what used to be civil rights in the good old USA.

  6. It is the 1% that finances all important elections, judicial appointments and commissions (E.G. 911 commission)….. Otherwise those of US that support the GOVERNMENT (with taxes) and NOT the campaigns of the contenders… would have some ACTUAL say in how the course of government policy is run…. So what we actually have is the best government that the special interests can buy……. and it is the 1% that are the players…. We the 99% are the played….

  7. If you've done nothing wrong* then you have nothing to worry about!

    (*definition subject to change without notice)

    p.s. that guy with the camera looks a bit like immortal technique

  8. [...] According to recently released documents, the federal government monitored the Occupy Wall Street movement from its very inception, internally referring to it as a potential criminal and terrorist threat despite acknowledging the movement’s explicit rejection of violent forms of protest. http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/01/01/declassified-us-government-colluded-with-big-banks-to-monitor-dis… [...]

  9. Government colluded with big banks? But…but…but…I thought that the big banks were the government. Or did I get that one wrong?

  10. What's shocking is that you lightweights accept this complete corruption as a reality and don't have the gumption to fight against it.

    You think yourselves hard headed realists but you are actually weak minded, weak kneed slaves

  11. Just remember the Whole Cuban Castro Fiasco was started over a spat about US sugar, The Banana Wars because of US Fruit! Yet you are suprised the banks and the Government collude with each other!

  12. [...] collusion between public officials, corporate operatives and private security companies to monitor, spy on and disrupt the explicitly non-violent Occupy Wall Street [...]

  13. [...] collusion between public officials, corporate operatives and private security companies to monitor, spy on and disrupt the explicitly non-violent Occupy Wall Street [...]

  14. very blog good adminssdsa

  15. very blog good admins

  16. very blog good adminsasdasd

  17. And these are the people we want to give unchecked CISPA power to monitor all Internet activity without warrants?

  18. So what has the heavyweight champ Mr. Bee been doing about it?

  19. You really think domestic monitoring of civilians is the program that will get cut. Ha, that's laughable, maybe you haven't heard, they are after the medicare and social security trust funds now, not domestic monitoring of people. Here's a wired article about the Gov.;s new state of the art monitoring and data mining complex. I can assure you this one is still funded. Good luck getting highter education if you served our country in the armed forces, that ones already cut. http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsada

  20. OMG. So sad. But still not nice to pick on a girl who was apparently not so whats the website that writes essays for you smart.

  21. hat communities divert law enforcement resources from violent crimes to illegal drug offenses, the risk of punishment for engaging i

  22. asdivert law enforcement resources from violent crimes to illegal drug offenses, the risk of punishment for engaging i

  23. most important job is taking your call when you get drunk in Riyadh. You don't get a great job at an influence mill with that on your résumé. You do if Ambassador to Saudi Arabia means what doing the "important work" needed under current policies.

  24. é. You do if Ambassador to Saudi Arabia means what doing the "important work" needed under current policies.

  25. Yea, what in the F***ing HELL are YOU doing about it, mr. "Above it all, AND you"? I think right now the important thing is raising awareness and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. Again, what the F*** have you done?

  26. Thank you nice blog.

  27. J Gateway is a new and upcoming condominium located in Boon Lay Way, Jurong East area. It is located right beside JCube, and the upcoming Westgate and Jem. With expected completion in mid 2016, it comprises of 4 towers with 783 units and stands 38 storeys tall

  28. I agree all comment

  29. good nice.

  30. good nice.

  31. good nice

  32. I am who I am because of you.

  33. Pour comprendre le référencement naturel il faut bien comprendre le fonctionnement d’un moteur de recherche.

  34. good niceee