Why the Chinese Cyber Threat is a Bunch of Baloney

John Glaser, February 25, 2013

The Obama White House seems to be launching a public relations campaign against China, drumming up hatred and fear about alleged cyber-espionage activities of the Chinese government against the US. The President is reportedly even considering imposing economic sanctions on China.

This is absurd on several levels. First of all, economic sanctions are not a policy option aimed at resolving diplomatic antagonism. It is a tool of coercion with no utility except to project dominance and ratchet up hostility between nations.

Secondly, the economic ties between China and the US are unprecedented at the moment. Imposing sanctions on them now would inflict self-harm on a US economy that is already struggling.

Also keep in mind that recent reports about China’s cyber-warfare against us include no solid proof that it is condoned by the Chinese government. The US Computer Security firm Mandiant released a report identifying the city the cyber-attackers came from, but that’s all.

“What is surprising,” writes Haroon Meer at Al Jazeera, ”is the unfaltering belief that since attacks come from IP addresses in the same geographic region as a [People's Liberation Army] unit, ipso facto, the attacks are state sponsored and need some sort of government response.”

“For context,” Meer adds, “the area in question is about the size of Los Angeles and houses over 5 million people (making it roughly the equivalent of the second most populated US city). Claiming that attacks originating from anywhere in this city must imply the involvement of Unit 61398 is a stretch and ignores a raft of other possibilities.”

Even so, what if they were state-sponsored? Is this anything Washington should get on its high-horse about? The largest government-sponsored cyber-attack to date came out of Washington, aimed at Iran. And that’s not all: The US government routinely conducts cyber-warfare. Meer cites a European Parliamentary Session document from way back in 2001 that detailed some examples:

  • The NSA intercepted communication between Airbus and the Saudi Arabian government during contract negotiations and forwarded this communication to Boeing and McDonnell-Douglas (who went on to win the contract instead).
  • The NSA forwarded technical details of an engineering design to a US based firm (who then patented the design before the original inventors).
  • The CIA hacked into the Japanese Trade Ministry to obtain details informing their negotiation on quotas for US cars.
  • The NSA intercepted communications between VW and Lopez (and then forwarded this information to General Motors).
  • The NSA surveillance of the Thomson-CSF/Brazil negotiations (for a billion dollar contract) were forwarded to Raytheon (who were later awarded the contract instead).

Since 2001, technology has become exponentially more capable, so the US government undoubtedly has increased such operations, in number and severity.

So China is not alone in its cyber operations. But the Obama administration’s trumpeting of Beijing’s alleged behavior is not mere happenstance.

For at least two years now, the Obama administration has engaged in an explicit policy of military containment towards China, aggressively surging military presence and activities in the Asia-Pacific and bolstering China’s regional geo-political competitors with increased military and diplomatic backing. China’s economy is growing and Beijing is becoming a more powerful state. Washington can’t have that.

So, what better way to demonize non-threatening enemies of the state than to hypocritically highlight their alleged cyber-warfare? After all, the American people need to be fed a pretext for initiating aggression towards China; a bigger economy and more geo-political sway won’t do.

In sum, Washington’s charges against Beijing should be taken with a grain of salt, to say the least. But we can expect much more talk of it as Obama’s “Asia-Pivot” evolves.




16 Responses to “Why the Chinese Cyber Threat is a Bunch of Baloney”

  1. [...] Obama Mulls China Sanctions for Trumped-Up Cyber Threat [...]

  2. The us government is the most dishonest regime there is.., for a sanction or a war they will say anything and walk the illegal street to get what they are after.., absolutely nothing.

  3. [...] Read Entire Article [...]

  4. [...] See on Scoop.it – Chinese Cyber Code ConflictSee on antiwar.com [...]

  5. It´s Washinton´s style – act like a bunch of jerks.

  6. [...] [...]

  7. While I do not disagree that many employees of the Federal Government are jerks, it does not change the fact that China is engaging in broadbased spying using the network and breaking into computers using whatever method works. I have gathered evidence over the years showing that there is constant flood of ssh dictionary attacks going on nonstop from tens of thousands of IPs owned by China. These can be geo – located…

    Given China's strict policies for getting a domain name, it is hard not to lay responsibility at the foot of the government.

  8. [...] Why the Chinese Cyber Threat is a Bunch of BaloneyAntiwar.com (blog)The US Computer Security firm Mandiant released a report identifying the city the cyber-attackers came from, but that's all. “What is … The NSA intercepted communications between VW and Lopez (and then forwarded this information to General Motors). [...]

  9. The US government wants to give out medals to American military employees who hack foreigners, but it acts all offended when someone hacks it. Hypocricy?

    Not defending hacking here, but evil is possible here at home too.

  10. It is very naive to believe that U. S. does not practice cyber spying.

  11. [...] SOURCE: ANTIWAR [...]

  12. The author of this article, and many of the respondents, are idiots. Since 1990, when I worked at Intel and we were routinely penetrated by Chinese moles, China has been activley seeking IP from the U.S. Considering that business in China is State-controlled, there is only one conclusion, and only an idiot would not make the connection.

  13. [...] “What is absolutely true is that we have seen a steady ramping up of cyber security threats,” Obama said in an interview with ABC News, adding that some attacks “are state sponsored,” although he did not provide evidence. [...]

  14. The Volkswagen Crafter van is built alongside the Mercedes Sprinter, but the two vans are very different, with all VW’s powered by the firm’s own 2.0-litre TDI engines. BlueMotion Technology models offer excellent economy and emission levels.

  15. A top retail trade group executive has called for tougher security standards that could mean more spending for the industry, its banks and business partners after a series of data breaches at major merchants.

  16. The Atlantic Club Casino Hotel closed early Monday, a victim of the casino saturation taking place in the Northeast.About 1,600 people lost their jobs at 12:01 a.m. as the 33-year-old casino shut its doors. Tearful employees embraced one another and exchanged goodbyes in Atlantic City.