US Interventionism Stokes North Korea Flames

John Glaser, March 13, 2013
US Air Force conducting military exercises in South Korea. Credit: Defense Dept.

US Air Force conducting military exercises in South Korea. Credit: Defense Dept.

This AP story says that North Korea may be gearing up for an attack on South Korea, if history is any guide. Apparently, past North Korean assaults have been preceded by explicit threats followed by a stretch of quiet.

…Pyongyang, angry over perceived slights, took its time before exacting revenge on rival South Korea. Vows of retaliation after naval clashes with South Korea in 1999 and 2009, for example, were followed by more bloodshed, including attacks blamed on North Korea that killed 50 South Koreans in 2010.

What’s wrong with the analysis is that North Korea is again portrayed as the sole offender, a rogue villain that is obsessed with aggression regardless of the context.

But let’s not forget what North Korea’s recent bluster is about. Kim Jong Un’s belligerent rhetoric is a reaction to two US-led policies – namely, harsh economic sanctions and provocative military exercises with the South.

The sanctions are useless. They accomplish nothing except to increase the deprivation of the North Korean people. Years of sanctions and diplomatic isolation have only pushed Pyongyang deeper into its own insular, authoritarian hawkishness.

And the military exercises Washington insists on performing with South Korea are equally egregious. The US says their purpose is to support our ally and promote stability, despite the fact that the drills have the predictable consequence of infuriating the North and increasing instability, as we’ve seen.

In reality, the military exercises – like other such operations the US performs around the world – are a wanton show of force meant to project power in a region Washington seeks to dominate militarily, economically, and politically. In some ways, this has never been clearer in the age of Obama’s Asia-Pivot.

As Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers wrote here at Antiwar.com last week, the US is far more deserving of being portrayed as the aggressor:

The United States stations 28,500 troops in South Korea. In November 2012 the US upgraded its weapons systems and announced an agreement with Japan that would allow South Korea to bomb anywhere in North Korea.  In June 2012 the Pentagon announced that Gen.l Neil H. Tolley would be removed as commander of US Special Operations in South Korea after he revealed to a Japanese foreign affairs publication that American and South Korean troops had been parachuting into North Korea on spy missions.

…South Korea and the US regularly hold military exercises off the Korean coast, which North Korea describes as planning for an invasion. The United States claims these exercises are defensive in nature to assure preparedness.  Prior to the recent nuclear test, Seoul and Washington conducted a joint naval exercise with a US nuclear submarine off South Korea’s east coast, followed by a joint air force drill as well as live weapon exercises near a disputed sea boundary between North and South Korea. These drills have gotten more aggressive during the Obama administration and since the death of Kim Jong-il, as outlined by geopolitical analyst Jen Alic

…North Korea has shown anger at these drills.  In response to the announcement of the  largest annual joint exercises for US and South Korean troops scheduled for March and April of this year, in a rare direct message to US Gen. James Thurman, North Korea warned the top American commander in South Korea on Feb. 23 of “miserable destruction” if the US military presses ahead with the joint drills with South Korea set to begin next month.

Like I said, the predictable consequences of US militarism are brushed aside. So if North Korea does engage in some sort of small scale attack soon, it will be in no small part because the US deliberately provoked it – choosing interventionism over stability.




14 Responses to “US Interventionism Stokes North Korea Flames”

  1. [...] Click here to read the article [...]

  2. if you kick a tied up dog almost everyday and abuse it by yelling at it, tossing stones at it and simply just teasing it constantly. If you starve it and rarely give it water. Then one day when the dog growls and lunges at you and you in mock surprise screaming out; 'rabid dog! rabid dog! Who is the instigator and idiot?

  3. [...] US Interventionism Stokes North Korea Flames [...]

  4. I was age 11 then the Korean War broke out, that was the year 1951 and our society’s greed for wealth has never stopped growing, more brutal imperialism always our choice when we go voting. For Empire USA is a learning process, destiny our master and as Desiderata would say,

    “You are a child of the Universe no less than the trees and the stars;
    you have a right to be here.
    And whether or not it is clear to you,
    no doubt the Universe is unfolding as it should.”

  5. And let us not forget about the US invasion of Korea in 1871!

  6. or the invasion, subjugation, dissolution of 330+ native tribes.,1/2 of mexico(polk war), Hawaii,every nation in southern and Latin america, Cuba, Russia(Polar Bear war)Philippines china,japan,…mmmm…it would be easier to say who it hasn't been assaulted by the good ol' united states of mordor…

  7. > "So if North Korea does engage in some sort of small scale attack soon, it will be in no small part because the US deliberately provoked it – choosing interventionism over stability."

    Maybe that's the plan, just like with Iran – an endless series of provocations and poking them with a sharp stick – all in the hope of obtaining a response that can serve as a "justification" for the war which USrael wants to start.

  8. [...] obey monkey” – that customarily accompany any critique of a unfamiliar process of perpetual war. Also note Limbaugh’s critique of how wrong a neocons and a administration were in their research [...]

  9. The U. S. is taking the wrong approach with North Koera. Read "Cruising for a Bruising with North Korea" at: iconject.com/korea.html

  10. The US is doing nothing wrong it doesn't want to start a war but has the right to defend itself and its allies and if they don't do exercises then if something happens we will be unprepared and we could loose a war because of it and loose alot more Americans if we dont

  11. [...] would be very likely to mitigate the tensions with Pyongyang would of course be for the US to not constantly antagonize the North through provocative military activities with the South and, um, sending nuclear capable [...]

  12. Have you ever thought about creating an e-book or guest authoring on other websites? I’ve a blog based upon on the same subjects you discuss and would love to have you share some storiesinformation. I know my visitors would value your post. In case you are even remotely interested, feel no cost to shoot me an e mail.

  13. Looking big clash is going on between North Korea and south Korea and also USA as well! But whatever it is we don't want any sort of clash because we want peaceful life and awfully our opinion will be well established in near future. Thanks

  14. Informative post shared it is !!! By reading this post about US Interventionism Stokes North Korea Flames, I have found lots of information that is unknown. This will be effective for all. Keep it up !