The Inevitability of Drones in the US and Abroad

Lucy Steigerwald, April 29, 2013

MQ-9_Reaper_2

Drones are the weapon of choice for fighting undeclared wars all over the Middle East. Surveillance drones are on the cusp of becoming that for U.S. government and law enforcement officials as they continue their efforts to observe everyone as much as and as often as possible.

Today Real Clear Politics (RCP) has an article titled “Drones: Coming to a Sky Near You” and if that headline looks familiar, it’s because this is a familiar fear. Last year the FAA decided that by 2015, it must complete its guidelines on the integration of drones into U.S. airspace. Since that announcement, publications from The Miami Herald to Time have sounded a cautious alarm about the prospect of thousands of drones filling American skies by 2020. There seems to be a new article every day, lately none of them offering much beyond a restrained paranoia; a look at the State of the Union in terms of drones.

But maybe paranoia has done some good. RCP takes a look at recent push-back from various state bodies, including the Massachusetts legislature, noting that:

According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, 39 states are considering laws that would restrict drones. Virginia in February imposed a two-year moratorium on drone aircraft. Idaho this month passed a law prohibiting spying by drones without the consent of the persons being spied upon. Idaho state Sen. Chuck Winder (R), the bill’s author, said the measure was intended to “prevent high-tech window peeping.”

On the other hand, 39 states have also put their names into the federal hat to compete to be one of six states that will test integration of these unmanned  aerial vehicles into American airspace.

Last week the mayor of Boston suggested using drones for surveillance at next year’s marathon. This isn’t surprising, as the government is always fighting the last terrorist attack. No matter how unlikely there is to be another incident at any marathon, especially Boston’s; drones cruising above the runners in 2014 is one way to combine looking like you’re doing something, furthering a precedent for normalized, intrusive behavior, and making the burgeoning drone industry — which, by one estimate, may become a $90 billion one in the next decade — very happy. The reaction to the militarized police presence in Boston after the bombing has been mixed. Today former congressman Ron Paul suggested that the city-wide lockdown, the invasive searches and police presence should “frighten us as much or more than the attack itself.” But many people, especially in Boston, were just fine with cops that looked like soldiers patrolling the streets of an American city.

The RCP article also notes that the Department of Homeland Security — serving as the umbrella that covers both war and police issues and helps make them troublingly indistinguishable –will be offering grants to police departments in order to ease purchase of their own drones. No doubt this will prove irresistible to police departments. DHS has already played a generous part in the militarization of police in the last ten years with its grants for Bearcat armored vehicles and other SWAT-ready tech.

The power of drones abroad is obviously a more frightening animal. Today The Atlantic published an article headlined “Living in Terror Under a Drone-Filled Sky in Yemen”. If that exploration of the psychological (and physical) toll that the drone war puts on civilians looks familiar, perhaps you caught the recent study of the grim effects 24/7 hovering death-robots have on the collective psyche of Pakistani people. Drone use abroad continues to be supported by the majority of adult Americans, however.

The proliferation of drones will not long be an American issue alone. “The number of countries that have acquired or developed drones expanded to more than 75, up from about 40 in 2005, according to the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress,” USA Today reported in January.

In spite of some heartening legislative attempts to rein in drones here at home, as well as protests over their international use, they cannot be fully put back into the box. That’s why endlessly rehashing the concerns that are fundamentally tied in with this technology is a good thing to do, even if it brings up a sense of Deja Vu for anyone even halfway paying attention. The RCP article contains no breaking news about drones, but the moment that such articles disappear, we’re in real trouble. That’s when drones have been fully accepted as the most efficient killing machines abroad, and the ideal mechanisms for surveillance at home.




35 Responses to “The Inevitability of Drones in the US and Abroad”

  1. [...] by Lucy Steigerwald [...]

  2. [...] The Inevitability of Drones in the US and Abroad [...]

  3. Drones will look good to the political establishment in the United States until a foreign drug cartel incinerates some politician or police official and their family in a border state.

  4. [...] for stray backpacks or pressure cookers, but that’s yesterday’s threat. Airborne …The Inevitability of Drones in the US and AbroadAntiwar.com (blog)Drones At Next Year’s Boston Marathon? Official Says It’s ‘A [...]

  5. [...] Blog and our whole staff is excited about her coming on board. Check out her very first post here, and be on the look-out for [...]

  6. Not that that will stop them, or even slow them down in the least… Most likely they'll just be inspired to launch even more, if current "logic" prevails.

  7. Welcome, Lucy. You wrote:

    "But maybe paranoia has done some good."

    Then you quote:

    "Idaho this month passed a law prohibiting spying by drones without the consent of the persons being spied upon. Idaho state Sen. Chuck Winder (R), the bill’s author, said the measure was intended to “prevent high-tech window peeping.”"

    But I would deny that this is a good thing. While I am happy to see governments refrain from using drones to "spy" on people, it remains that it is not aggression for people to take pictures of people from drones, even without their consent. And since this bill presumably prohibits everyone from using drones to "spy" on people, not just the government, this bill is outlawing a non-aggressive peaceful act and is therefore unjust.

    As for why recording people without their consent (e.g. from drones) is not aggression, see my post "A Wiretapping Double Standard: Machines vs. Animals": http://wp.me/p2cdsV-bl

  8. I'll take a look at your link, and look closer at the bill. The former sounds particularly interesting. Thanks for the comment and the welcome!

  9. My "A Wiretapping Double Standard" post is pretty lengthy for the amount of content, so here's a quick summary of the argument:

    "1. People have the right to record their conversations with others using their brain.
    2. Whether a conversation or piece of information can justly be recorded or not is not dependent on the tool (e.g. brain or electronic recording machine) used to record the conversation/information.
    3. Therefore people also have the right to record their conversations with others with the help of non-brain tools, such as electronic recording machines."

    I wrote this in the context of someone who was imprisoned for recording a phone conversation they had with someone without their permission, but it would apply to recording the images of someone on their property from a drone up in the sky using a camera as well.

    If you have the right to look down at them with you eyes from a plane flying over and remember what you see (i.e. record with your brain), then surely you have the right to do the same thing with the aid of a tool, such as a camera. And this is what the drones do.

  10. [...] TimesGuest: Boston bombings make a case for drones, waterfront camerasThe Seattle TimesThe Inevitability of Drones in the US and AbroadAntiwar.com (blog)The Inquisitr -BizPac Review -Daily Callerall 29 news [...]

  11. until I saw the bank draft saying $4410, I be certain that my friend was like actually earning money part-time on their laptop.. there neighbour had bean doing this for only 6 months and by now repayed the mortgage on their apartment and bourt a new Citroën DS. read more at, kep2.com

  12. [...] foreign adventures — doesn’t mean that the new technology doesn’t itself raise new worries. Regardless, let drones be the segue we use to talk about war, as long as we’re [...]

  13. [...] drone use is relatively uncontroversial; drones that monitor crops are benign. Drones that monitor people are less so, and raise important constitutional questions. Already police stations in Seattle and Oakland have [...]

  14. I THINK THE LANGUAGE YOU GUYS USE IS ABOMINABLE. WHAT HAS HAPPENED TO CRISP ENGLISH LANGUAGE USED SOME YEARS BACK? AND INSTEAD OF RUNNING A TOWN DOWN, PLAY UP TO THE POSITIVES AND TRY AND ENCOURAGE TOWNSFOLK TO BETTER AND BEAUTIFY THEIR COUNTRY. THAT IS PATRIOTISM.

  15. Very interesting breakdown, indeed. It’s nice to have such information available in one location and some ideas for new and different directions to take to help one stand out.

  16. I agree with your Thought,
    breaking news english

  17. New weapon means new war. Sky must be full of birds but not weapon.

  18. Listen not to the war lords, but instead to the peace seekers and save this species from itself; alternate lnks:

    http://neworleans.indymedia.org/news/2013/07/1823
    http://la.indymedia.org/news/2013/07/260942.php

    http://argentina.indymedia.org/news/2013/07/84296

    http://www.newciv.org/nl/newslog.php/_v194/__show

  19. I started to enjoy reading your articles . The views and comments worms die give me so much valuable information .

  20. This is very astounding post,i consider to recommended it.Thanks for sharing this great info here.

  21. Just wanted to give a quick shout out and say that I genuinely enjoy reading your articles. This is one great result after checking through the net and meeting suggestions just like you've provided

  22. Just wanted to give a quick shout out and say that I genuinely enjoy reading your articles. This is one great result after checking through the net and meeting suggestions just like you've provided

  23. When all the aid; military, etc is tolled, they get billions every ywar. In fact, they get more foreign aid than all the foreign aid we send to other countries combined. http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/03/21/1963-the-year-

  24. There is one caveat to it, though. If you are going to be on it, you should be drinking a lot of water. If you are not the kind of person who really pays attention to their water intake, it may seem strange to you, but you'll get used to it.water diet plan

  25. A diet chart must include a healthy diet and exercise regime. A healthy diet is the stepping stone to leading a healthy lifestyle. There are different types of diet plans that are freely available. It is important to choose a diet plan that is best suited to your fitness levels. weight loss calculator for men

  26. I enjoyed this post very much, such a out standing post. Marketing is a complex thing Thanks. is bubblegum casting legitimate

  27. So the next time Human Rights Watch comes out with a report that’s critical of Israel for its treatment of the Palestinians, I’ll assume that you’re going to be saying the same thing, correct

  28. Wow what a Great Information.its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.I adore you to admire the websites.thanks for sharing the information

  29. Wow what a Great Information.its very nice informative post. thanks for the post.I adore you to admire the websites.thanks for sharing the information
    Spear Construction

  30. Call from Us to India in cheap rates never before was so easy try it now

  31. OPEN MULTIPLE URL'S WITH JUST ONE CLICK
    BEST SEO TOOL NOW YOU DO NOT HAVE TO WORRIED ABOUT OPENING VARIOUS

    URL'S WITH THE SINGLE CLICK OF YOUR MOUSE BUTTON. THE

    FAST URL OPENER CAN HELP YOU ACHIEVE THIS GOAL AND

    SAVE YOU SOMETIME AND BOTHERATION OF CLICKING THE

    MOUSE KEYS AGAIN AND AGAIN.
    ENJOY THE WONDERS OF FAST URL OPENER AND SAVE TIME

  32. The drones war breaks the human rights. I do not like wars

  33. I agree with you. I also do not understand why drones are created for killing people / us.!!!

  34. I disagree with what I wrote 54 weeks ago above (as PeaceRequiresAnarchy). Or at least, I disagree with the reasoning I used to reach the conclusion that people have the right to film. Note that people don't have the right to film movies in movie theaters because the theatre owner says they're not allowed to film and the owner has the right to set the rules for how others use it. If my above reasoning was correct then viewers would have the right to film since they have the right to watch. -PeaceRequiresAnarchy/wjkiely

  35. That skinny little guy with the comically high voice, and the pencil thin neck, is a potential mass murderer, whose followers are entirely capable of violence incited by his murderous,