The Lingering Repercussions of NATO’s Stupid War in Libya

John Glaser, April 29, 2013
Libyan rebels gathered in Ajdabiya, March 2011. Credit: Al Jazeera English

Libyan rebels gathered in Ajdabiya, March 2011. Credit: Al Jazeera English

From the beginning, Antiwar.com warned of the inevitable blowback that would result from the US-NATO war in Libya. Eager to prove itself on the side of Arab Spring protests, America chose sides in a civil war on trumped up pretenses of humanitarian intervention. Helping to overthrow Muammar Gadhafi, a dispensable ally at the time, ended up bolstering the power and influence of dangerous armed Islamist groups and destabilizing much of North Africa, most notably spawning a coup in Mali.

A new piece from the Guardian reports that, as Walter Russell Mead summarizes it, “The Mali War was blowback from the Libya War; now we have blowback from the Mali War… in Libya.”

The impetus for this uprising [in Mali] came from ethnic Tuareg soldiers who had fought alongside Muammar Gaddafi and fled south when his regime fell. They were later augmented by jihadists from Libya and across north Africa, who triggered international condemnation for their destruction of ancient Sufi Muslim shrines in Timbuktu. The fear across the Maghreb is that the French operation that has pushed them out of the northern cities has inadvertently compounded problems elsewhere in north Africa as jihadist units disperse.

“If you squeeze a balloon in one part, it bulges out in another,” said Bill Lawrence, of International Crisis Group, a political consultancy. “There’s no question that the French actions in Mali had the effect of squeezing that balloon towards Algeria and Libya.”

So the US-NATO war in Libya bolstered Islamist militias and scattered jihadists around to neighboring countries, and now it’s coming full circle back to Libya. As usual, US interventionism generates unintended consequences which are then used to justify more interventionism.

But the truth is, things never fully quieted down in Libya. The current government, hailed by Barack Obama as on the path to secularism and democracy, has allied with jihadist groups like Ansar al-Sharia, one of many that refuse to disarm and recognize the government (or whatever you call it).

“This leaves us wondering exactly how all those clever humanitarians in the White House run the numbers these days,” Mead writes. “Do they calculate that our Libyan excursion saved more lives than have been lost in the subsequent chaos in not one but now several northern African countries? We certainly hope that whatever accounting they use is very clever, because from our back-of-the-envelope arithmetic, there has been zero benefit to the national interest from this poorly judged, poorly prepared, poorly handled war.”

Beyond having no benefit to the “national interest,” this convoluted mess has been a net loss for US interests and for the well-being of most in the region.




16 Responses to “The Lingering Repercussions of NATO’s Stupid War in Libya”

  1. The US/NATO axis of global belligerence has become quite adept at wars of naked stupidity. An arrogant and special kind of stupid.

  2. [...] The Lingering Repercussions of NATO’s War in Libya [...]

  3. Why is Saif Gaddafi still being kept prisoner. From my previous research I concluded he was a reformer and in fact was made welcome as a guest of Tony Blair.
    If Tony welcomed him into his home why is he not sticking up for him. Still can't work out why it was so important to remove Gadaffi.

  4. The NATO attack on Libya was a disaster for the world. Why? Because NATO knew that Gadaffi had thousands of portable surface to air missiles. NATO knew they would be captured and dispersed by the insurgents. Now those missiles are a threat to commercial air traffic everywhere. The NATO people who let this happen should be in jail.

  5. Oil,Gold,Greed

  6. So the US-NATO war in Libya bolstered Islamist militias and scattered jihadists around to neighboring countries, and now it’s coming full circle back to Libya. As usual, US interventionism generates unintended consequences which are then used to justify more interventionism.

  7. If you think Shirley`s story is terrific…, 5 weeks ago my uncle's neighbour basically brought home $9982 working 10 hours a week at home and there co-worker's mother-in-law`s neighbour did this for six months and made more than $9982 in their spare time on their computer. applie the tips on this page, kep2.com

  8. The truth is that at the time, the mainstream media supported the lie of mad dictator and peddled this war, believing of the benefits of economic gain and imperialistic control. Too bad the only fall out for NATO et al, is rueful, semi- regret. For those affected its been ethnic cleansing, displacement, death, mutilation and chaos

  9. [...] The Lingering Repercussions of NATO’s Stupid War in Libya (antiwar.com) [...]

  10. [...] The Lingering Repercussions of NATO’s Stupid War in Libya (antiwar.com) [...]

  11. [...] backfired spectacularly. Libya, a country most Americans never heard of it prior to 2010, has been given over to Islamic radicalism in the absence of Muammar al-Gaddafi. Ambassador Chris Stevens infamously [...]

  12. [...] governments as we see in Iraq; internecine civil war in countries such as post-NATO intervention Libya; covert wars fought by western proxies, as we see in Syria; or overt attacks in Yemen, Somalia, [...]

  13. [...] as we see in Iraq; interne­cine civil war in coun­tries such as post-NATO inter­ven­tion Libya; cov­ert wars fought by west­ern prox­ies, as we see in Syria; or overt attacks in Yemen, [...]

  14. [...] as we see in Iraq; interne­cine civil war in coun­tries such as post-NATO inter­ven­tion Libya; cov­ert wars fought by west­ern prox­ies, as we see in Syria; or overt attacks in Yemen, [...]

  15. Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that “the CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria, ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama administration, according to U.S. officials and Syrian figures.”

  16. Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that a??the CIA has begun delivering weapons to rebels in Syria, ending months of delay in lethal aid that had been promised by the Obama administration, according to U.S. officials and Syrian figures.a??