Former State Dept. Lawyer Criticizes Drone War Secrecy

John Glaser, May 09, 2013

Harold Koh, formerly the Obama administration’s top State Department lawyer, has criticized the systematic secrecy surrounding the drone war. The New York Times:

472px-Harold_Konju_Koh_croppedIn a speech Tuesday at Oxford University, Harold H. Koh, a Yale law professor who as the State Department’s top lawyer in 2010 gave the first public speech explaining the targeted killing program, said the administration “has not been sufficiently transparent to the media, to the Congress and to our allies.”

The result is “a growing perception that the program is not lawful and necessary, but illegal, unnecessary and out of control,” said Mr. Koh, who served during President Obama’s entire first term. “The administration must take responsibility for this failure, because its persistent and counterproductive lack of transparency has led to the release of necessary pieces of its public legal defense too little and too late.”

Notably, Koh defends the legality and the necessity of the drone war, but quibbles with the administration’s secrecy primarily because it has unhelpful consequences in public perceptions of the covert targeted killing program.

Koh has a history of legally justifying expansive powers of the executive, famously defending the President’s war in Libya, despite violating the Constitution, by not receiving congressional sanction, and the War Powers Resolution.

The fact that someone like Koh, who in Obama’s first term surprised people with his willingness to interpret the law in a way that basically put zero restraints on the Imperial Presidency, is worried about the drone war’s secrecy is remarkable. Here’ s guy who defends going to war without congressional authority, defends presidential kill lists and a world-wide assassination program, defends indefinite detention policies – and even he thinks the secret war Obama has been waging since 2009 goes a little too far.




8 Responses to “Former State Dept. Lawyer Criticizes Drone War Secrecy”

  1. [...] Former State Dept. Lawyer Criticizes Drone War Secrecy [...]

  2. This idiot should be in gitmo, not a "professor" at Yale. And shame on Yale. What is it with these sorry Asian "lawyers" becoming complete tools of tyranny. I know they cheat their way through college but this is pathetic.

  3. RickR30. You with no education can call a Yale professor of law and an advisor to your government an idiot. Show how stupid you idiotic Americans are. No wonder the world detests you.

  4. A report by researchers at the Stanford found in September that the drone program is “terrorizing” the people of Pakistan and that it is having “counterproductive” effects. Antiwar.

  5. If U.S. uses the same unlawful justifications as China, North Korea and Iran without considering human rights and international laws, it will greatly chip away our core values.

  6. It's totally unsecure.

  7. Notably, Koh defends the legality and the necessity of the drone war, but quibbles with the administration’s secrecy primarily because it has unhelpful consequences in public perceptions of the covert targeted killing program.

  8. Notably, Koh defends the legality and the necessity of the drone war, but quibbles with the administrationa??s secrecy primarily because it has unhelpful consequences in public perceptions of the covert targeted killing program.