Meet the Post-AUMF Executive War Powers, Same as the Old Ones

p052013ps-1224

There’s a discussion over at the Lawfare blog about whether or not finally repealing the expansive war powers authorized in the 2001 AUMF will actually do anything to constrain Obama and future U.S. presidents.

Mind you, the Lawfare crowd includes former Bush administration officials who wouldn’t necessarily be opposed to the expanded executive war powers usurped in the post-9/11 world being made permanent. But the discussion is revealing nonetheless.

Robert (Bobby) Chesney argues that while the AUMF is the most immediate official justification for the programs of indefinite detention and borderless drone strikes, the president has acquired so much unprecedented power since 9/11 that the AUMF isn’t even necessary to continue to carry them out.

According to Chesney, “the current shadow war approach to counterterrorism doesn’t really require an armed-conflict predicate – or an AUMF, for that matter.” Instead, the president will retain the ability to drone bomb anybody, anywhere in the world because the Executive Branch will justify it with the same self-defense rationale as it does now. (That self-defense rationale is, I think, indefensible, resting as it does on an untenable redefinition of “imminence”).

Here is Jack Goldsmith following up Chesney’s post:

First, I agree with Bobby’s implication that we are on the road toward post-AUMF uses of military force around the globe justified entirely on the basis of self-defense and the President’s Article II powers.  Self-defensive military actions based on Article II are (I think) what Jeh Johnson was talking about when he referred to “military assets available in reserve to address continuing and imminent [extra-AUMF] terrorist threats” and what Harold Koh meant when he said “I see no proof that the U.S. lacks legal authority to defend itself against those [beyond the AUMF] . . . who pose to us a genuine and imminent threat,” and what the President probably had in mind when he said that “[o]ur systematic effort to dismantle terrorist organizations must continue” even after the AUMF-war ends.

Goldsmith adds: “it would be an unprecedented expansion of Article II authority if the scope and scale of current military and paramilitary operations outside Afghanistan today were justified under Article II.”

It has become fashionable in recent weeks to openly discuss the revision or even repeal of the outdated AUMF. Carl Levin and John McCain have been advocating such a change. And Obama put it in his speech last week, saying he “look[s] forward to engaging Congress and the American people in efforts to refine, and ultimately repeal, the AUMF’s mandate.” “This war, like all wars,” he said, “must end.”

But that is just grandstanding if we grant that Obama knows what the Lawfare folks know, that his war powers won’t be curtailed if and when the AUMF is repealed.

And that is the world we now live in. The warfare state no longer needs legal sanction to execute a global assassination program and selective application of habeas corpus. Those aren’t just powers the president gets in times of war, you see. They are inherent.

29 thoughts on “Meet the Post-AUMF Executive War Powers, Same as the Old Ones”

  1. Pingback: ZGR 5/29/2013 | Zephyr Global Report
  2. Pingback: Surprise! Washington Post Sides With Hawks Over New War Powers « Antiwar.com Blog
  3. Pingback: Surprise! Washington Post Sides With Hawks Over New War Powers | IndyInAsia-Pacific

  4. Even though the government has acknowledged that the secretive program has exceeded its legal limits, violating Americans’ Fourth Amendment constitutional rights, the Obama administration aggressively pushed for its full renewal.

    1. But that is just grandstanding if we grant that Obama knows what the Lawfare folks know, that his war powers won’t be curtailed if and when the AUMF is repealed.

  5. iwaah
    thanks for the article, I liked what you said. so continue with this beautiful work! really enjoying reading, thank you!
    ????? ????? ,, 2015 ..

  6. My friend mentioned to me your blog, so I thought I’d read it for myself. Very interesting insights, will be back for more!

  7. Employment law not only deals with the relationship between employees with the management but it's a way to establish mutual insurance and legal relationship.

  8. Fundamentally, cyber law is a term used to describe the legal issues related to use of communications technology. It is a different field of law in which an intersection of many legal fields, including intellectual property, privacy, freedom of expression, and jurisdiction.

  9. Employment law solicitors in London, typically work for both the employers as well as the employees. They advise on matters related to HR issues, defending or anticipating tribunal claims and the discussion, drafting and policy execution.

  10. One of the things that David Cameron promised business owners was that he would help make employment law fairer to employers. Should you wish to understand how adjustments

  11. Thank heavens buying home gym machines is the practical method to bring the ability of the commercial gym to the convenience of your home. Many individuals are uncertain with regards to knowing exactly what equipment to purchase.

  21. Hi I found your site by mistake when i was searching yahoo for this acne issue, I must say your site is really helpful I also love the design, its amazing!. I don’t have the time at the moment to fully read your site but I have bookmarked it and also add your RSS feeds. I will be back in a day or two. thanks for a great site.

  23. Hi I found your site by mistake when i was searching yahoo for this acne issue, I must say your site is really helpful I also love the design, its amazing!. I don’t have the time at the moment to fully read your site but I have bookmarked it and also add your RSS feeds. I will be back in a day or two. thanks for a great site.

  24. Hi I found your site by mistake when i was searching yahoo for this acne issue, I must say your site is really helpful I also love the design, its amazing!. I don’t have the time at the moment to fully read your site but I have bookmarked it and also add your RSS feeds. I will be back in a day or two. thanks for a great site.

  27. I love the blog. Great post. It is very true, people must learn how to learn before they can learn. lol i know it sounds funny but its very true. . .
    facebook

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos