The Fourth Amendment was Mortally Wounded by the Drug War Long Before National Security Tried to Kill It

06paul-blog480New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie recently trashed Sen. Rand Paul, and other members of the more freedom-friendly corner of the GOP (like Rep. Justin Amash and his noble effort to reign in the NSA). Christie, sounding like Rudy Giuliani circa 2007, said that pro-privacy folks like Paul need to stop all their dangerous libertarianish thoughts because it’s offensive to 9/11 victims and it endangers us all. Christie also spoke approvingly of both Bush and Obama’s security efforts. Terrorism, to the Gov., is still such a big threat that it justifies certain scary-sounding, privacy-violating programs. And he’s not alone in believing that nonsense.

It is nonsense. But what if it were true? What if terrorism was as big a threat as security hawks claim, and that we could — at least — believe that the NSA is working to protect the American people from being killed? What if the FBI was actually stopping more threats than it was inciting? And what if they and other law enforcement hadn’t failed to stop planned attacks from the Boston Bombing to 9/11? What if secret courts, secret laws, and secret interpretations really could be trusted because they’re “legal”? And what if the NSA only searched through the metadata of millions of Americans when they were really, really, looking for something serious? They need the haystack to find the needle, but maybe they really have no interest in a few million innocent needles?

Even if this narrative about national security and the level of threat presented by terrorism were true — and of course it isn’t — powerful people simply do not keep these serious violations of privacy under glass until the most dire emergency. Consider, for a moment, the drug war’s history in the decline of the Fourth Amendment.

In 1971, Richard Nixon declared a war on drugs and tested the waters with a DC bill that made no-knock raids legal on private homes. Some years later, Ronald Reagan stepped up that war, and unlike Nixon, most of the powers that Reagan claimed — and the Supreme Court frequently confirmed — were not ever taken away. The cop, court, and Constitutional drug war mess needs more detail than there is space here (check out Radley Balko’s Rise of the Warrior Cop, as well as Antiwar’s interview with him for more of that history) but  really, once upon a time, when terrorism wasn’t keeping the paranoid up at night, a bunch of people decided that enemy number one was drugs. And no violation was too serious, no quarter was to be given in this fight. Sound familiar?

The effects of that decision to go to “war” can now be seen in the prison-industrial complex, militarized police and their mission creep, and our comatose Fourth Amendment.

Here are just a few figures: in 2012 87 percent of state and federal law enforcement wiretaps were over narcotics, with stats from the past decade showing similar numbers. “Sneak and peak” warrants — legalized by the PATRIOT Act — between 2009 and 2010 were used for narcotics investigations 76 percent of the time. And what is the NYPD’s contentious “stop and frisk” policy if not a massive violation of the privacy of (mostly black and Hispanic) New Yorkers?

Previously at Antiwar I critiqued libertarian John Stossel’s bizarre refusal to admit that the NSA spying is dangerous. But Stossel did indeed have a point within the madness –the drug war started it. Not only are terror-fighting tools used to investigate drug crimes much of the time, but many privacy protections were already chipped away by the drug war decades before 9/11.

Recently Rand Paul pestered the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) for clarification about their use of domestic drones. The FBI responded with a few details including that drones have been used for “eight criminal cases and two national security cases” since 2006.  The most notable thing mentioned in their report is that the FBI did not see fit to get a search warrant for their drone use, since the targets of their investigations didn’t have an expectation of privacy. This isn’t particularly surprising, more a depressing confirmation of what we would already have suspected.

As noted by The Verge, the Supreme Court ruled in Florida v. Riley (1989) — a drug war case! — that a warrant wasn’t necessary when the police wanted to use a helicopter to hover 400 feet above a suspect’s property. If the Fourth Amendment has withered in the face of the cops’ need to catch those damn weed growers, it’s difficult not to feel frightened at the prospect of cheap, quiet, drones in the thousands creeping into our airspace; technology getting ahead of any lingering protections the Fourth Amendment still offers. And there is no doubt that the same people now defending the NSA, wiretapping, and anything else done in the name of keeping us safe from big bad terrorists will not say a word when drones become the next tool in fighting the lunatic war on drugs.

21 thoughts on “The Fourth Amendment was Mortally Wounded by the Drug War Long Before National Security Tried to Kill It”

  1. Pingback: The Fourth Amendment was Mortally Wounded by the Drug War Long Before National Security Tried to Kill It | Alternative News Alert!
  2. Pingback: The Five Takes Sides In GOP's Christie Vs. Paul Fight: 'Best Thing That Could … – Mediaite | NewsShow

  3. Good comparison. Both “wars”, against terrorism and drugs, allow the government to increase its power and its budget. This is not an accident, and are good reasons why they never end.

  4. New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie recently trashed Sen. Rand Paul, and other members of the more freedom-friendly corner of the GOP (like Rep. Justin Amash and his noble effort to reign in the NSA).

    1. Your apt username is correct. Of course, plenty of conservatives pick hating the Fourth Amendment as their one consistent issue.

      1. As a member of the left you can add demodogs to the haters of the 4th and the vote was only close for the beloved theater effect so loved by the beltway.

        This well done thanks.

  6. Pingback: Headlines of the day II: Of spooks and silly walks | eats shoots 'n leaves

  7. Interestingly going thru this topic a number will agree with the above since its real and it is nice seeing an op that is showing stuff on this topic for all to read.

  8. Pingback: For the Simple Crime of Smoking Marijuana, the Government Ruined This Man’s Family Forever - Liberty Crier
  9. Pingback: For the Simple Crime of Smoking Marijuana, the Government Ruined This Man’s Family Forever – DISTURBING | Luke Buchanan's blog

  13. First of all, I long ago declared eternal hostility towards anything that “expands the government’s tool box” or its bank account or its bathing-suit areas or whatever else it wants to expand. But the larger point is that it is clear this initiative is just a reiteration of the hypercritical approach to tyranny Washington has displayed for decades.

  14. First of all, I long ago declared eternal hostility towards anything that a??expands the governmenta??s tool boxa?? or its bank account or its bathing-suit areas or whatever else it wants to expand. But the larger point is that it is clear this initiative is just a reiteration of the hypercritical approach to tyranny Washington has displayed for decades.

  15. Awesome blog. I enjoyed reading your articles. This is truly a great read for me. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles

  16. ????? ????? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ?? ??? ?????? ??? ?????? ????? ??? ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ????? ????? ?? ?? ?? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ?? ?????? ?????? ???? ?? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ???? ???? ????? ????? ????? ????? ?????? ??????? ?????? ??????? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ???????? ????? ???? ????? ???? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ???? ???? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ????? ????? ??????? ???? ?? ???? ????????? ????? ?????? ???? ???????? ??????? ??? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?? ???? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ???? ?? ?? ????? ?????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ??? ?? ??? ?? ???? ???? ????? ??? ???? ???? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ??? ?????? ???? ?? ???? ?????? ?????? ????? ???? ????? ????? ???? ?????? ????? ??? ??????? …..

  17. Word of love and appreciation and greeting fulfillment and private
    Greeting fill all the meanings of brotherhood and friendship
    Greetings from the Heart to Heart
    Thank you with all my heart qqs

  18. Pretty much and plenty of conservatives who all of a sudden cry fowl over Obama's spying programs had and still have no problems supporting the statist drug war.

  27. Word of love and appreciation and greeting fulfillment and private
    Greeting fill all the meanings of brotherhood and friendship
    Greetings from the Heart to Heart
    Thank you with all my heart
    GREAT ARTICLE TNX FOR WORK I LOVE THIS
    ????? ????
    and welcom to d great blog for cooking gamesuiy

Comments are closed.

viewpoint highlights
breaking news
© 2024 Antiwar.com. All rights reserved.
Antiwar.com Blog Stock Photos provided by our partner Depositphotos