Egypt: Paging Samantha Power!

John Glaser, August 15, 2013

Barack_Obama,_Samantha_Power,_Tom_Donilon,_and_Susan_Rice

Think back a couple weeks and recall the political narratives accompanying Obama’s pick for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Samantha Power, the journalist and Harvard scholar at the forefront of the debate over humanitarian interventions for the past decade. Foreign Policy’s John Hudson described Power’s “staunch advocacy of U.S. intervention on moral grounds.” Max Boot said she is a “principled advocate of humanitarian intervention.”

But now that the post-military coup U.S.-backed Egyptian autocracy has slaughtered more than 500 people in the streets, asks Jacob Heillbrunn at The National Interest, where is Samantha Power?

When President Obama visited Cairo on June 4, 2009, he made a special point of declaring that he had come to establish a new beginning between the United States and the Arab world. This beginning, he said, would be based “upon mutual interest and mutual respect; and one based upon the truth that America and Islam are not exclusive…they overlap, and share common principles—principles of justice and progress; tolerance and the dignity of all human beings.” Now, in Egypt, an authoritarian government, headed by the military, is slaughtering followers of Islam, and what does Obama have to say?

Not much, it appears. What is emerging from the president and his advisers is a few worried murmurs of protest, coupled with studied indecision. Where are the human-rights activists such as UN ambassador Samantha Power? Where is national-security adviser Susan Rice who vowed to stick up for the oppressed after she remained silent during the genocide in Rwanda? Do they agree with Secretary of State John Kerry’s earlier assessment that the military is “restoring democracy” in Egypt?

Examples of the dishonest selectivity of “humanitarian” interventionists are easy to render. Slaughter of innocents only calls for U.S. intervention as a moral imperative if the one doing the slaughtering isn’t one of our allies. That’s a standard in U.S. propaganda as tried and true as the red, white, and blue.

Obama got on the horn earlier today to condemn the violence of the Egyptian military. He announced that the U.S. would call off an upcoming joint U.S.-Egypt military drill, a symbolic gesture considering he did not announce what many were expecting, that the $1.3 billion in U.S. aid would be cut off, in accordance with U.S. law.

Obama insisted, “We deplore violence against civilians.” And he’s really doing something about it, by continuing to support it.




12 Responses to “Egypt: Paging Samantha Power!”

  1. [...] Print This | Share This | Send a letter to the editor | Letters | Antiwar Forum [...]

  2. Good commemtary!
    There is only one country that has influence over EGypt's army, because the Empire controls countries and societies by control of the military, because it is the only Empire left in the world.
    There can be little doubt that up to this point the US approves what the Egyptian army is doing.
    The official commentariat tells us that the $1.5 billion + is to give the US influence. If that is true, as I am sure it is, it would appear that the aims of our govt are not so noble.
    Bottom line in Egypt. Democracy: Muslims need not apply.

  3. One could get the sense that Team Obama shall embrace the junta and hold their noses as the stench of death wafts over the Great Pyramid of Giza.

  4. double standard. syrian mil cannot be allowed to slaughter civilians but our egyptian mil should.

  5. Obama also supports the Bahrain regime; he doesn't even murmur against it. I am deeply saddened by this attitude, I had not thought Obama would be this weak. Tragedy after tragedy unfolds; Egypt, Syria, Bahrain, and all against a backdrop of silence from US (and UK, my own country.)

  6. forget weak, borat is ably doing the bidding of neocon banksters and the martial law kooks who run the natl stasi agency

  7. John, don't forget Hillary Clinton with whom Americans may well be saddled with after Obama leaves in disgrace. She is able to lay low since she is out of government right now, but her policy agenda was as venal and feckless as what we have had to endure with Rice and Power.

  8. MacCIAnKSA101:???? ?? ???? ??????? ?????? ??????? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ??????? ???? ??? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ???????? ?? ???? ??????????? ???????? ??? ????? ?????????? ???????? ???? ?????????? ????????? ????? ??? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ???? ????? ????? ?????? ?? ????? ?????? ???? ??????? , ???? ???????? ????????? ?? ????? ?? ?? ???????? ????? ?? ???? ????? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ???? ???? ??????? ????? , ?????? ???? ???? ?? ???????? ??????? ???????????????? ????????? ?? ???? ??????? ???? ????????? ?? ???????? ????? ??? ?????? ?? ???????? ???????? ??? ??????? ( ???????? ) ??????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ?????????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?????? 35% ?? ????? ?????? , ?????? ?? ??? ?????? ???? ????? ?????? ????? ??? ??? ???

  9. [...] cosa succederà dopo nel Paese” mentre l’uno o l’altro (John Glaser, 16 agosto 2013 Antiwar.com) ironizzano sulla presenza nell’amministrazione Obama di due arpie [...]

  10. [...] in vacanza: “Vediamo cosa succederà dopo nel Paese” mentre l’uno o l’altro (John Glaser, 16 agosto 2013Antiwar.com) ironizzano sulla presenza nell’amministrazione Obama di due arpie [...]

  11. I admired that absolutely amazing design. its actually altered types design. abundant work! travel

  12. Excellent approach ! I anticipate it will accessible for all marketers to advance their content.

    http://forextrading1online.com