Obama Is On the Verge of Committing a Criminal Act of Aggression in Syria

John Glaser, August 27, 2013

14

I have to admit, sometimes I get too bogged down in the moral and practical estimates of U.S. militarism. Just Foreign Policy’s Robert Naiman at the Huffington Post reminds us that, ahem, Obama can’t legally bomb Syria without Congressional approval:

On Sunday, Republican Sen. Bob Corker and Rep. Eliot Engel — a Democrat who voted for the Iraq war — told Fox News that President Obama should strike Syria first and get congressional approval afterwards.

That’s not how the U.S. Constitution says it should go. That’s not how the War Powers Resolution (which, despite the name “resolution,” is binding U.S. law) says it should go. The Constitution and the War Powers Resolution say that absent an attack on the United States, Congress must approve military action before it takes place.

…Congress is out of session right now. But there is no emergency that requires immediate, unconstitutional, illegal action. If there were an emergency that required immediate action, Congress could be called back into session. If there’s no emergency that requires immediate action, then action can wait until Congress reconvenes.

Syria’s sectarian civil war has been going on for years. If President Obama wanted to intervene militarily, he’s had ample opportunities to put the proposition to congressional debate and vote.

It is perhaps not a coincidence that when President Obama intervened militarily in Libya — also without congressional authorization — Congress was out of session.

There is no provision in the Constitution or the War Powers Resolution for a “recess war.” If the precedent is set that the President can do whatever he or she wants so long as Congress is out of session, the war powers provisions of the Constitution and the War Powers Resolution will be substantially undermined.

It’s also worth noting that the U.S. is a party to international statutes establishing it as a criminal act to go to war against a country that doesn’t pose a direct threat without a resolution from the UN Security Council. According to the Constitution, this obligation, signed by treaty, is “the supreme law of the land.”

It is well known that the leaders of the world’s most powerful state needn’t abide by the law, as the Bush administration’s 2003 war of aggression against Iraq showed indelibly. But let it be known that President Obama is on the verge of committing a criminal act of international aggression. Period.




17 Responses to “Obama Is On the Verge of Committing a Criminal Act of Aggression in Syria”

  1. [...] Obama Is On the Verge of Committing a Criminal Act of Aggression in Syria (antiwar.com) [...]

  2. And that aggression is the supreme crime, which encompasses all other crimes.

  3. Never fear though, the lawyers are working on justifications that will undoubtedly by fully obtuse and ambiguous, as well as arrogant…and no one in Congress will put forth the effort to cry foul. The Congress is more than willing to allow Obama to go down that path, as they were when Bushco did the same thing so they can say with gusto when things suit them that they were not consulted and would have advised against whatever the Administration decides to do. And of course, there is an election coming up next year…campaign fodder for sure.

  4. He is a very slippery human life form, and belongs in a dungeon.

  5. [...] I’ve written, Obama is about to violate both the Constitution and international law by going to war without the [...]

  6. [...] I’ve written, Obama is about to violate both the Constitution and international law by going to war without the [...]

  7. [...] President Obama contemplates how and when to commence war crimes in its impending attack on Syria for, at best, dubious reasons, it’s worth remembering that [...]

  8. [...] President Obama contemplates how and when to commence war crimes in his impending attack on Syria for, at best, dubious reasons, it’s worth remembering that we [...]

  9. [...] Obama Is On the Verge of Committing a Criminal Act of Aggression in Syria [...]

  10. [...] I’ve written, Obama is about to violate both the Constitution and international law by going to war without the [...]

  11. [...] President Obama contemplates how and when to commence war crimes in his impending attack on Syria for, at best, dubious reasons, it’s worth remembering that [...]

  12. Syria’s sectarian civil war has been going on for years. If President Obama wanted to intervene militarily, he’s had ample opportunities to put the proposition to congressional debate and vote.

  13. [...] the past couple of weeks I’ve written multiple times about the illegality of the Obama administration’s plan to bomb Syria. But the [...]

  14. HI, Elite proxy Anonymous proxy Transparent proxy ======> Go here: http://full-proxy.blogspot.be/

  15. Abdelmonem al-Said is the head of the militia that kidnapped Libya’s prime minister last month. He proudly stands by his role in the abduction and defiantly announces in press conferences how not scared he is of retribution or punishment, because the government is too weak, Crisp reports.

  16. The Miele I keep at my office. I have been very happy with my Canon Pixma printers. And it focuses on love and promises and how to be a 'good' human thru Victor, Victoria and Emily. Pioneer Cd Players Ebay Use Car Cd Player Home http://www.a-pathetic.net/93/bose-cd-players-for-… Thanks for reading, I hope this review was helpful! Tomorrow I'll go try to find a metal one. Tested before install and after install. What I did was let the hair grow for a bit, a few days, then I actually tweezed them! Yes, I spent quite a bit of time on that. http://www.youtube.com/

  17. I'm really happy to find this site and did enjoy reading useful articles posted here. The ideas of the author was awesome, thanks for the share