John Kerry and the Orwellian Language of War

Nathan Goodman, September 06, 2013

When is a war not a war? According to John Kerry, launching cruise missiles at Syria is not a war. Testifying before the US Senate’s Foreign Relations Committee, Kerry said, "President Obama is not asking America to go to war."

Kerry’s argument seems to hinge on the idea that no American ground troops will likely be deployed. Of the proposed strikes, Kerry said, "I just don’t consider that going to war in the classic sense of coming to Congress and asking for a declaration of war and training troops and sending people abroad and putting young Americans in harm’s way." Perhaps no Americans will be put in harm’s way, although claims of possible Iranian plans for retaliation cast doubt on that hope. But regardless, innocent Syrians will still be killed by American missiles. People’s homes and possessions will still be destroyed. Mass aggressive violence will still be waged by the US government in a foreign land. That’s a war.

And while Kerry is not currently proposing sending ground troops to Syria, he acknowledges that it’s a possibility. Kerry also told the Senate: "But in the event Syria imploded, for instance, or in the event there was a threat of a chemical weapons cache falling into the hands of al-Nusra or someone else and it was clearly in the interest of our allies and all of us, the British, the French and others, to prevent those weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of the worst elements, I don’t want to take off the table an option that might or might not be available to a president of the United States to secure our country."

But to be clear, Secretary Kerry and President Obama are not proposing a war. Yes, they will use cruise missiles to slaughter Syrians, and if they don’t like the Syrian government’s response they may even send ground troops. War profiteers like Raytheon will certainly profit. But the Secretary of State will insist it’s not a war.

So, why the Orwellian "War is Peace" attitude here? Partially because Kerry recognizes this war is not popular with the American public. Polls show substantial public opposition. When explaining that he would not consider American attacks on Syria a war, Kerry went a step further and said "when people are asked, do you want to go to war with Syria, of course not! Everybody, a hundred percent of Americans will say no." When most Americans oppose war, the best solution apparently is to change the name to something else.

But this attitude makes sense for another reason: The state wants to conceal the truth about its wars. This is why it employs so many Newspeak terms when discussing war. Murdering civilians becomes "collateral damage." Any military age male killed by an American drone strike is automatically labeled a "militant." And a war against Syria becomes not war but "an action that can degrade the capacity of a man who’s been willing to kill his own people by breaking a nearly hundred-year- old prohibition."

The U.S. government doesn’t want you to know the truth about their wars. This is why Chelsea Manning is in prison for blowing the whistle on war crimes, including an attack in which "U.S. troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an airstrike to destroy the evidence." It’s why the military denied for years that they used white phosphorus, a chemical weapon, in Fallujah.

This rampant dishonesty is precisely why we should never trust them when they want to go to war. Especially when they refuse to call war by its name.

Reprinted from Center for a Stateless Society.




  • Pingback: John Kerry and the Orwellian Language of War | Alternative News Alert!()

  • http://empireslayer.blogspot.com/ Empire Slayer

    Possibly the single most common propaganda technique is to add "to secure our country" to the end of anything.

    "We need to fund the FSA and Al Qaeda linked torturers and murderers… to secure our country."

    Wow.

  • organizethis

    ah, words….lovely words….sooo….flexible.

    it’s not torture…..it’s enhanced interrogation.

    it’s not random killing….it’s collateral damage.

    it’s not a bombing….it’s a kinetic action.

    it’s not a coup….it’s a move towards democracy.

    it’s not a war….it’s a credibility recovery action.

    it’s not an assassination of an american citizen, ordered by
    the american president without trial. oh wait. it is.

    impeach the bastard.

  • El Tonno

    > rampant dishonesty

    Lying while in office. Badly lying. Hidden motives. Promises made behind closed doors that have to be fulfilled now. Following third-party interests. The most positive interpretation is hubris linked to narcissism. An explosive mix best discussed on the couch of Dr. Freud.

  • UE NOW

    When UNXibrahimi bomb Falasteen for 65yrs, Kerry is defendincc Sharon citi'z

  • Herb Schaffler

    Kerry calling air strikes not a war reminds me of when Clinton said oral sex was not really sex.

  • Pingback: This Is How the American Youth Will Stop the Syrian War! « Antiwar.com Blog()

  • Pingback: This Is How the American Youth Will Stop the Syrian War! | Alternative News Alert!()

  • Pingback: This Is How the American Youth Will Stop the Syrian War! | Michigan Standard()

  • http://www.ecwaters.com/ ecwaters

    This rampant dishonesty is precisely why we should never trust them when they want to go to war. Especially when they refuse to call war by its name.

  • http://www.foreignlanguage.net Justin

    Kerry is understanding he is only the intelligent guy in the world and everyone else don't know anything at all. Whatever they are progressing through everyone is clearly seeing it's a war. Now I think Kerry should change his voice tone and language of war as well. Thanks.

  • http://harihermann.blog.pl/ Repliki zegarków

    It’s hard not to suspect that the Justice Department’s snooping on journalists from the Associated Press is far more common than anyone has so far suggested. In this latest case, they just had the misfortunate of getting caught.

  • http://harihermann.blog.pl/ Repliki zegark?3w

    Ita??s hard not to suspect that the Justice Departmenta??s snooping on journalists from the Associated Press is far more common than anyone has so far suggested. In this latest case, they just had the misfortunate of getting caught.