Pat Buchanan: Syria Is Dress Rehearsal For War With Iran
Pat Buchanan on the Neil Cavuto Show on Fox:
Pat Buchanan: Syria Is Dress Rehearsal For War With Iran | Alternative News Alert!September 6th, 2013 at 5:10 pm
[...] Print This | Share This | Send a letter to the editor | Letters | Antiwar Forum [...]
Smedley ButlerSeptember 6th, 2013 at 7:16 pm
War is a Racket, A few profit, The many pay. Impeach The President and his cabinet, plus all in Congress who vote for war. Enough of this abuse of their power.
UE NOWSeptember 7th, 2013 at 2:29 am
Islami is Sunna in Peace Sheea in War but Mursi Ignore my methodology and went with TantawiJumaJamal Makr
Herb SchafflerSeptember 7th, 2013 at 6:06 am
I just saw a report at aol.com that Obama has gotten several countries' backing for war with Syria over Assad's use of chemical weapons. I suspect that what Obama will do if he doesn't get Congressional support for the war, he will get some type of international support. I would hope that the leaders of other countries would look at the evidence closely. It appears that there is a lot of evidence that the Rebels were responsible for the chemical attack.
Vic PittmanSeptember 7th, 2013 at 6:32 am
I guess we should at least send the "rebels" (mercenaries) some new machetes so that they can continue beheading elderly Catholic priests and captured teenage soldiers. I would support missile srikes on them…the CIA trained SS. What a twisted world…
Danny MarkusSeptember 7th, 2013 at 8:06 am
Right now the acute problem for the US and the West seems to be how to prevent the Syrian government from using chemical weapons in the future. The obvious solution, which should amply satisfy Western powers, would be the removal of all chemical and bacteriological weapons from Syria without a military action which might have dire unforeseen consequences. This could be done by putting a resolution in front of the Security Council demanding the Assad government sign the treaty prohibiting the use of chemical weapons; and obligating the Security Council members see to it that the existing Syrian stockpile of such weapons is removed or destroyed within a time span of 90 days.
One has to wonder why this non-military alternative has elluded the Obama Administration.
ReasonSeptember 7th, 2013 at 8:31 am
To Danny: remove the word Syria and replace it with Israel and continue after 65yr s of UN-U$ lies-killing
jttSeptember 7th, 2013 at 8:55 am
Danny if that should happen then Israel with its biological weapons, nuclear weapons and conventional weapons would spread its apartheid empire across the middle east, and get this "Danny Boy" the Security Council is impotent when it comes to Israel and their blatant disregard for International Law. Why is North Korea still standing today and not run over by the Rouge State? Catch up on your reading Danny.
YonatanSeptember 8th, 2013 at 5:18 am
And Iran is the dress rehearsal for the attack on more Russia near states by the US.
David SmithSeptember 8th, 2013 at 8:39 am
The question, of course, is what do you mean by chemical weapons? Agent Orange was a chemical weapon, napalm is a chemical weapon, white phosphorus is a chemical weapon. The US has used all of these in its recent wars. You could argue that depleted uranium is a chemical weapon in that it does damage beyond mere explosive power. We used that, too. Do we now have to divide these into subcategories? Then which are acceptable and which are not? It might be interesting to see this argued in the UN.
Advertise on Antiwar.com
Copyright © Antiwar.com 2013