House GOP Budget Cooks the Books to Avoid Defense Cuts

John Glaser, September 16, 2013

Remember sequestration? Well, according to the mandatory cuts to the federal budget, funding for fiscal year 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion. Funny then, that House Republicans have proposed a budget of $988 billion for 2014.

PentagonThe reason, according to the Cato Institute’s Tad DeHaven, “appears to be that the GOP wants to manufacture angst over sequestration’s hit to defense spending, which is a Republican sacred cow.” DeHaven continues:

The Congressional Budget Office’s score of the House Republican CR shows that defense is funded at $20 billion above the sequestration-included cap for fiscal 2014. However, non-defense funding is actually $1 billion below it. Thus, it seems clear that the CR was intentionally written to force the sequestration-defense issue, which would kick-in in January.

I’m obviously not privy to the wheeling and dealing going on among the House Republicans responsible for constructing the CR. However, below the jump is a CR one-pager produced by the House Appropriations Committee–presumably for distribution to the flock– that supports the appearance of an attempt to manufacture angst over defense cuts.

Note that the one-pager rather shamelessly claims that “If the next round of FY14 sequester cuts kicks in under current law, ALL of the reductions will come out of national defense.” Yes, but that’s because the authors of the one-pager kept non-defense funding at the sequestration-cap and put defense spending $20 billion over it!

According to this one page propaganda piece from the House Appropriations Committee, “Defense to bear the full weight of FY14 sequester cuts–approximately $20B. Pentagon officials have called them ‘dangerous’ to our national security.”

Silly Republicans, tricks are for kids. Incidentally, I got the feeling Senator James Inhofe, one of the fiercest foreign policy hawks in Congress, opposed Obama’s plan to bomb Syria for similar political reasons. In interviews, Inhofe repeatedly said he couldn’t support a war on Syria because sequestration has gutted the defense budget (which, of course, is a big lie).

Not surprisingly, Inhofe, like I’m sure the House Republicans who proposed this misleading budget, has received hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from the defense industry.




  • Guest

    Finally, the vulture capitalism has landed.

  • Curious

    If defense spending is not going to be cut then why not use it for something that will benefit society and call that defense. Wars of choice does not constitute defense either so the definition of defense is already malleable to represent anything.

  • http://johnnymarket.com/ johnnymarket

    Remember sequestration? Well, according to the mandatory cuts to the federal budget, funding for fiscal year 2014 can’t exceed $967 billion. Funny then, that House Republicans have proposed a budget of $988 billion for 2014.

  • http://cynicalinny.blogspot.com/ Cynical in New York

    This is one of the reasons why I believe most of the conservative opposition to going to Syria is mostly bullshit. They're not mad that Obama wants to bomb Syria, their mad that he isn't going to Iran.

  • Ball

    The only problem I have with this article is the implication that defense spending is only a sacred cow to the Republicans. Don't expect a peep from Pelosi on this matter. It takes both parties to keep quiet

  • http://www.bigboysmoving.com/ bigboysmoving

    This is one of the reasons why I believe most of the conservative opposition to going to Syria is mostly bull****. They're not mad that Obama wants to bomb Syria, their mad that he isn't going to Iran.

  • http://www.drshermak.com/facial-surgery-baltimore/facelift/ drshermak

    This is one of the reasons why I believe most of the conservative opposition to going to Syria is mostly bull****. They're not mad that Obama wants to bomb Syria, their mad that he isn't going to Iran.

  • http://lewrockwell.com Jon

    And just how much of this 'defense budget' will go to racist apartheid Israel?
    America, take back your independence.

  • http://deyarminhealth.wordpress.com Eleanore Chastant

    That which you explained created a large amount of impression. Nevertheless, think about this, let’s say an individual extra a bit content? After all, We should not inform you the best way to manage your blog, but what if you additional a thing for you to maybe obtain parents interest? As being a movie or possibly a photo as well as 2 to get men and women looking forward to what you have to express. For me, it might help make your website become more active a bit.

  • http://www.recipeslearn.com/easy-rasmalai-recipe-homemade rasmalai recipe

    Amazing article. I am so impressed. Could never think of such a thing is possible with it…I think you have a great knowledge especially while dealings with such subjects.keep it up

  • http://www.207bounce.com/ Bounce House

    I'll in a split second bookmark your site as I can't uncover your e-defensive layer membership gathering or pamphlet utilize. Do you possess few? Compassionate approve me grasp so that I may upright contribute. Recognizes.