Human Rights Groups Call Drone War Illegal, Counterproductive

John Glaser, October 22, 2013

Drone-strike-damage

Both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have published reports on the Obama administration’s drone war, saying it may amount to war crimes. This comes just days after the UN Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions submitted a study of its own on the drone war to the UN General Assembly.

According to the Human Rights Watch report, not only does the drone war violate international law, but it boosts local support for al Qaeda. Here’s some of the press release:

United States targeted airstrikes against alleged terrorists in Yemen have killed civilians in violation of international law, Human Rights Watch said in a report released today. The strikes, often using armed drones, are creating a public backlash that undermines US efforts against Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP).

The 102-page report, ‘Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda’: The Civilian Cost of US Targeted Killings in Yemen,”examines six US targeted killings in Yemen, one from 2009 and the rest from 2012-2013. Two of the attacks killed civilians indiscriminately in clear violation of the laws of war; the others may have targeted people who were not legitimate military objectives or caused disproportionate civilian deaths.

“The US says it is taking all possible precautions during targeted killings, but it has unlawfully killed civilians and struck questionable military targets in Yemen,” said Letta Tayler, senior terrorism and counterterrorism researcher at Human Rights Watch and the author of the report. “Yemenis told us that these strikes make them fear the US as much as they fear Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula.”

They also provide a video:

Amnesty’s report is called “Will I Be Next?” on account of an 8-year old Pakistani girl who watched her grandmother get torn to shreds in a drone strike as she was picking vegetables. ”I wasn’t scared of drones before,” the young girl said, “but now when they fly overhead I wonder, will I be next?”

Much of the Amnesty report focuses on the terrorizing nature of the constant hovering of armed drones overhead and the effect that is having on the civilian population. It echoes a study from the Stanford and NYU schools of law last year, which found, “Drones hover twenty-four hours a day over communities in northwest Pakistan, striking homes, vehicles, and public spaces without warning. Their presence terrorizes men, women, and children, giving rise to anxiety and psychological trauma among civilian communities.”

Here’s a video from RT covering the Amnesty report:

Notably, Amnesty calls on U.S. authorities to “Bring those responsible for unlawful drone strikes to justice in public and fair trials…”

Are we taking bets on how likely that is to happen?




11 Responses to “Human Rights Groups Call Drone War Illegal, Counterproductive”

  1. Anyone or organization can produce a report saying this or that, what is at stake here is the iligality of the drone killings itself, question is even if these organizations took the USG to court over their illegal activities which court would they use? The only solution for these people to go away is to kick them out of office, elect people like Ron Paul and others alike.

  2. [...] to all this the devastating reports from both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch this week detailing the human and civilian costs of the drone war and questioning its legality, and [...]

  3. [...] to all this the devastating reports from both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch this week detailing the human and civilian costs of the drone war and questioning its legality, and [...]

  4. [...] to all this the devastating reports from both Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch this week detailing the human and civilian costs of the drone war and questioning its legality, and [...]

  5. […] of the U.S. drone war or that it consistently kills civilians, as the two recent reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch document. Rather, raids are better because they reduce public anger and provide the opportunity to […]

  6. […] of the U.S. drone war or that it consistently kills civilians, as the two recent reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch document. Rather, raids are better because they reduce public anger and provide the opportunity to […]

  7. […] of the U.S. drone war or that it consistently kills civilians, as the two recent reports from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch document. Rather, raids are better because they reduce public anger and provide the opportunity to […]

  8. Ron Paul would be okay for this issue if he ended drones, but then his killer austerity would mean more deaths in these same countries by cutting off aid to keep them from starving, and deaths in America with his lunatic cuts. His 2012 economic plan in the election showed he is a danger to america.

  9. […] Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented several other cases that follow the pattern as […]

  10. […] Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented several other cases that follow the pattern as […]

  11. […] Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have documented several other cases that follow the pattern as […]