Big Brother’s Loyal Sister: How Dianne Feinstein Is Betraying Civil Liberties

Norman Solomon, November 06, 2013

Ever since the first big revelations about the National Security Agency five months ago, Dianne Feinstein has been in overdrive to defend the surveillance state. As chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, she generates an abundance of fog, weasel words, anti-whistleblower slander and bogus notions of reform – while methodically stabbing civil liberties in the back.

Feinstein’s powerful service to Big Brother, reaching new heights in recent months, is just getting started. She’s hard at work to muddy all the waters of public discourse she can – striving to protect the NSA from real legislative remedies while serving as a key political enabler for President Obama’s shameless abuse of the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

Last Sunday, on CBS, when Feinstein told "Face the Nation" viewers that Edward Snowden has done "enormous disservice to our country," it was one of her more restrained smears. In June, when Snowden first went public as a whistleblower, Feinstein quickly declared that he had committed "an act of treason." Since then, she has refused to tone down the claim. "I stand by it," she told The Hill on Oct. 29.

Days ago, taking it from the top of the NSA’s main talking points, Feinstein led off a San Francisco Chronicleop-ed piece with 9/11 fear-mongering. "The Sept. 11, 2001, attack on the United States was highly organized and sophisticated and designed to strike at the heart of the American economy and government," she wrote, and quickly added: "We know that terrorists remain determined to kill Americans and our allies."

From there, Senator Feinstein praised the NSA’s "call-records program" and then insisted: "This is not a surveillance program." (Paging Mr. Orwell.)

Feinstein’s essay – touting her new bill, the "FISA Improvements Act," which she just pushed through the Senate Intelligence Committee – claimed that the legislation will "bridge the gap between preventing terrorism and protecting civil liberties." But as Electronic Frontier Foundation activist Trevor Timm writes, the bill actually "codifies some of the NSA’s worst practices, would be a huge setback for everyone’s privacy, and it would permanently entrench the NSA’s collection of every phone record held by U.S. telecoms."

California’s senior senator is good at tactical maneuvers that blow media smoke. In late October – while continuing to defend the NSA’s planetary dragnet on emails and phone calls – Feinstein voiced concern "that certain surveillance activities have been in effect for more than a decade and that the Senate Intelligence Committee wasn’t satisfactorily informed." Spinning the myth that congressional oversight of the NSA really exists, she added: "Therefore, our oversight needs to be strengthened and increased."

As usual, Feinstein’s verbal gymnastics were in sync with choreography from the Obama White House. The "certain surveillance activities" that she has begun to criticize are the NSA’s efforts targeting the phones of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other allied foreign leaders. Feinstein mildly chided Obama for ostensibly not being aware of the eavesdropping on Merkel’s cell phone ("That is a big problem"), but she was merely snipping at a few threads of the NSA’s vast global spying – while, like the administration as a whole, reaffirming support for the vast fabric of the agency’s surveillance programs.

The White House is now signaling policy changes in response to the uproar about monitoring Merkel’s phone, the New York Times reported on Nov. 5, but "President Obama and his top advisers have concluded that there is no workable alternative to the bulk collection of huge quantities of ‘metadata,’ including records of all telephone calls made inside the United States." Feinstein is on the same page: eager to fine tune and continue mass surveillance.

With fanfare that foreshadows a drawn-out onslaught of hype, Feinstein has announced that the Senate Intelligence Committee will hold hearings on NSA surveillance. "Her committee is now making preparations for a major investigative undertaking, which is expected to take at least several months," the Wall Street Journal reports. When the show is over, "The report that results from the probe will be classified."

With Dianne Feinstein’s hand on the gavel, you can expect plenty of fake inquiries to pantomime actual oversight. She has shown a clear commitment to deep-sixing vital information about the surveillance state, in a never-ending quest for the uninformed consent of the governed. "From out of the gate, we know that her entire approach is to make those hearings into a tragic farce," I said during an interview on C-SPAN Radio last week. "Her entire approach to this issue has been to do damage control for the NSA…. She is an apologist and a flack for the surveillance state, she is aligned with the Obama White House with that agenda, and we at the grassroots must push back against that kind of a politics."

Norman Solomon is co-founder of RootsAction.org and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. Information on the documentary based on the book is at www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.




10 Responses to “Big Brother’s Loyal Sister: How Dianne Feinstein Is Betraying Civil Liberties”

  1. Mrs Feinstein, who decided to stovepipe the data collected by the NSA directly to Israel. Given this direct feed, doesn't this effectively mean that the NSA is effectively Israel's surveillance arm?

  2. […] Norman Solomon | AntiWar.com […]

  3. I didn't see this FBI (?) FOIPA document posted at antiwar.com but maybe I missed it…LOTS of redacted info though:
    "Synopsis: Threat assessment on Justin R and Eric G"
    "It is recommended that a PI be opened to determine if Eric Anthony Garris and/or Justin Raimondo are engaging in, or have engaged in, activities which constitute a threat to National
    Security on behalf of a foreign power."
    Lots of focus on comments about those "dancing Israelis" and comments about it. (which would be the opposite of supporting a foreign power!). And the last page concerns a threat to hack antiwar.com.
    http://cryptome.org/2013/11/anti-war-fbi-spy.pdf

  4. The Surveillance State apparatchiks have the goods on Feinstein – re her and her husband's insider trading on info divulged during Congressional hearings – so blackmail isn't too radical of a thought on why she is kowtowing to the three letter spy agencies and going to bat for every illegal and unconstitutional act undertaken and improved upon by the Obama admin. There's nothing like the threat of having your dirty secrets dragged thru the courts to keep the political hacks in line. Their profits and wealth depend upon it.

  5. Feinstein you hag, you career political hack, you're a traitor–to constitutional principles.

  6. […] Read more […]

  7. The only criticism of Ehud Barack Obama Frankenfeinstein can give is the surveillance of Angela Merkel and other allies. She and Ehud Barack Obama should let us bug their mail, e-mail and phones.

  8. […] absent from Cardin’s list of vocal supporters is the ACLU, one country’s most prominent civil liberties group. Its California office worked this fall to dilute similar legislation. That bill, signed last […]

  9. Feinstein’s powerful service to Big Brother, reaching new heights in recent months, is just getting started. She’s hard at work to muddy all the waters of public discourse she can – striving to protect the NSA from real legislative remedies while serving as a key political enabler for President Obama’s shameless abuse of the First,

  10. Feinsteina??s powerful service to Big Brother, reaching new heights in recent months, is just getting started. Shea??s hard at work to muddy all the waters of public discourse she can a?? striving to protect the NSA from real legislative remedies while serving as a key political enabler for President Obamaa??s shameless abuse of the First,