NSA Bulk Metadata Collection Is Illegal: Government Oversight Board

John Glaser, January 23, 2014

The NSA’s bulk collection of every American’s telephone call records is illegal, according to the federal government’s independent review panel, the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

The NSA’s interprets Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which permits the F.B.I. to obtain business records deemed “relevant” to an investigation, as granting it the authority to collect the call records of all Americans and hold them for years for querying. The Oversight Board says no dice.

New York Times:

An independent federal privacy watchdog has concluded that the National Security Agency’s program to collect bulk phone call records has provided only “minimal” benefits in counterterrorism efforts, is illegal and should be shut down.

…The program “lacks a viable legal foundation under Section 215, implicates constitutional concerns under the First and Fourth Amendments, raises serious threats to privacy and civil liberties as a policy matter, and has shown only limited value,” the report said. “As a result, the board recommends that the government end the program.”

It’s hard to get any clearer than that, but it’s worth remembering that this review panel isn’t alone. This comes on the heels of the ruling by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon that the phone metadata program is “almost certainly” unconstitutional.

A ruling from the FISA court in 2011 found that the NSA “frequently and systematically violated” statutory laws governing how intelligence agents can search databases of Americans’ telephone communications and that NSA analysts deliberately misled judges about their surveillance activities in order to get court approval.

There is also bipartisan agreement in Congress that the NSA has systematically violated the law. Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI), the author of the Patriot Act, including its Section 2015, has said from the beginning that the NSA’s bulk metadata collection program exceeds the authority of the law. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), who is on the Senate Intelligence Committee and has access to classified information about the NSA’s surveillance practices, said in October that even with the overly broad statutory powers granted to the NSA, “the rules have been broken, and the rules have been broken a lot.”

“We welcome the board’s report, and we agree with is principal conclusions,” the ACLU said in a statement. “The NSA’s call-records dragnet is illegal and ineffective and presents a serious threat to civil liberties.”

Sorry to ask such a 5th grade Social Studies question, but…what is it that’s supposed to happen when people violate the law? I can’t seem to remember.

Update: On Twitter, Scott Horton provides the answer to this question…




7 Responses to “NSA Bulk Metadata Collection Is Illegal: Government Oversight Board”

  1. I­m mak­ing ­over $­1­3k a month working ­part tim­e. I kept hea­ring other p­eople tell me­ how much m­oney they can ma­ke­ online­ so I d­ecide­d to look int­o­ it. Wel­, it was all tru­e and ha­s totally ch­anged­ my life. ­This is­ wha­t I do,

    ???????????????W­­­W­­W.TEC­­­­­­3­­0.C­­­O­M

  2. See my reports on the total corruption of the fbi and the effects thereof:
    http://www.sosbeevfbi.com/updatejan5.html
    http://lissakr11humane.com/2012/09/08/collapse-of

  3. my friend's mother makes $65 an hour on the internet . She has been out of work for 9 months but last month her pay was $20649 just working on the internet for a few hours. check this/…>>> http://x.co/3kiuG

  4. If you think that a non functioning democratic, a manipulative government/s don't know that their illegal acts are illegal, your naivety is based on believing that somehow such government works for the people.

    Yet, wait for Hillary Clinton, in practical terms she will show you what I mean.

  5. […] would not be taking that advice. foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/23/independent-federal… NSA Bulk Metadata Collection Is Illegal: Government Oversight […]

  6. I emphasized that these were former U.S. officials because that seems to be the only time people in government dare utter a perspective contrary to Israel’s right-wing; that is, when domestic politics is no longer a factor. This makes John Kerry’s concurrence unlikely in the extreme.

  7. I emphasized that these were former U.S. officials because that seems to be the only time people in government dare utter a perspective contrary to Israela??s right-wing; that is, when domestic politics is no longer a factor. This makes John Kerrya??s concurrence unlikely in the extreme.