Stop Giving Chickens Away, Bill Gates

Bill Gates’ philanthropic efforts are usually greeted with near-universal praise from people who love his money believe he is a great humanitarian, but Bill Gates knows very little about sustainable, intelligent development.

Bolivia to Bill Gates: Go to Hell and Take Your Chickens with You

The billionaire recently sought to donate 100,000 chickens to impoverished countries. The leftist government of Bolivia, one of the nations to receive the poultry, refused the donation, describing Gates’ gift as “offensive.”

“He does not know Bolivia’s reality to think we are living 500 years ago, in the middle of the jungle not knowing how to produce,” said Bolivia’s minister of land and rural development. “Respectfully, he should stop talking about Bolivia, and once he knows more, apologize to us.”

Coop Dreams

Gates announced the chicken initiative – dubbed [Honestly, I am not making this up] “Coop Dreams” – earlier this month.

“It’s pretty clear to me that just about anyone who’s living in extreme poverty is better off if they have chickens,” wrote Gates, who was born in a well-to-do suburb and has pretty much been one of the One Percent ever since. “In fact, if I were in their shoes, that’s what I would do – I would raise chickens.” He says that the animals are easy and inexpensive to raise, empower women (“because chickens are small and stay close to home”), and can help feed children in poor families.

Melinda Gates also likes chickens and women. She calls chickens “the ATM of the poor,” because they are easy to sell on short notice to cover day-to-day expenses.

What’s Wrong with Free Stuff?

So Bolivia aside, what could be wrong with free chickens?

  • All countries have some sort of market economy going on. Farmers raise animals, and sell them to local people. In places without a lot of electricity and transportation, this all functions at a micro-level. There is a relationship between the economic needs and capacities of the farmer and how much food the local people want to buy. If you dump lots of free chicken into that system, the system tends to collapse. Prices can go up if people get greedy and push food out of the budgets of many, or go down because supply exceeds demand, and that can drive farmers out of business.
  • The bit about “empowering women” by having them raise chickens can have the same effect as above, basically adding lots more producers into a closed system and hoping everything does not go to hell. It also ignores the question of what else those women might have to do, how many know anything about raising chickens, have space to do it and have the money needed to buy feed, veterinary services, whatever chicken raisers need.
  • If the woman ends up with more chicken than her family needs, how is she to market it? Does she have access to transportation? Is there a dealer network? Most markets in the developing world are closed systems; one does not simply wander in and set up a stall.
  • If a large number of women, or anybody, are raising chickens, why would others need to buy chickens? Wouldn’t they be raising their own?
  • When people come to believe someone from the outside will randomly show up with free stuff, they tend to stop working very hard and just wait for the next shipment. Until it doesn’t come and then pretty much their world collapses.
  • In developing economies, one does not just acquire 100,000 chickens, or import them, and drive around the countryside in four-wheel drive Ubers. One must work with the host country officials, who, sad to say, see their jobs mainly as a way to get rich off of corruption. There is a very good chance the well-meaning Gates’ will encourage host-country corruption by paying the bribes, processing fees, needed for their chickens, and there is a good chance the local officials will shake down the recipients of the charity once Bill has moved on to do good elsewhere.
  • Now the reason you would donate chickens to a country is because that country lacks enough chickens. Well, you better hope that the chickens you buy somewhere else don’t bring in anything like disease or pests that the host country is not ready for.
  • Bill claims most of the people he wants to give chickens to earn only $2 a day, but that the chickens sell for $5 a bird. Who will be buying up all that chicken? Maybe at some point a kind of chicken-trickle-down effect will occur?
  • Bill and Melinda write about how when women in these countries become entrepreneurs with chicken, they will “have a voice.” Money certainly does talk in the world Bill and Melinda live in, but in traditional societies (for better or worse) the role of women changes very, very slowly. A few bucks made selling chickens, if that even happens, is unlikely to dent thousands of years of culture, particularly if that culture is also deeply embedded in a religion such as Islam. And some women may not really want to be entrepreneurs. The West tends to assume that all Muslim women, for example, hate the way their life works and wish to one day were mini-skirts and strappy red high heels

Sustainability

If you are talking about a short-term food donation to stave off hunger, such as after an earthquake, go ahead, please help. But for any long-term good to come of all this, it must respect the realities of the local market, and it must be sustainable. Free chickens are unlikely to do that.

BONUS: Now some might ask: Peter, how do you know anything about this? To which I would answer: because I watched an almost identical project fail in Iraq. The United States, in what we called Operation Chicken Run, sought to remake the local chicken market in a rural area of Iraq, and every bad thing I mentioned above actually did happen, in real time, around us. There’s a whole chapter in my book, We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People about this, appropriately titled “Chicken Sh*t.”

DOUBLE BONUS: Bill Gates would probably improve the lives of more people by dumping 100,000 X-Boxes on them.

Peter Van Buren blew the whistle on State Department waste and mismanagement during Iraqi reconstruction in his first book, We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People. His latest book is Ghosts of Tom Joad: A Story of the #99 Percent. Reprinted from the his blog with permission.

5 thoughts on “Stop Giving Chickens Away, Bill Gates”

  1. Yeah, if the x-boxes are rooted. So you could theoretically put a better operating system on them. But chickens, you know, if you don’t harvest the eggs for a few months and have the foresight to have a rooster in with all the hens, (one rooster is enough and one more would have them killing each other, so much for using them as a symbol of cowardice) and by golly you’ll have a whole bunch more chickens than you had at first. Awesome how that works. And they eat everything. Except chicken poop. Nothing eats chicken poop.

    When I go to talking about eating squab, aka pigeons, people invariably at least one in the crowd who have gathered to hear my wisdom (happens to the best of us, and since I’m the best….) one will say “eeeewwww! they’re rats with wings! they eat garbage!” Well, dammit, chickens eat stuff the pigeons would pass up.
    They eat stuff dogs or hogs won’t eat. They’ll eat pigshit. They are nasty vicious birds. But tasty.

    My sister once had a notion to raise chickens. In the mountains of Colorado. Not a good idea. But she had one reservation, “how do you kill something you raised from an egg?” Well, if you take care of chickens for more than a couple of days you’ll think of all kinds of ways how to murder them. it is what it is.

    Bill Gates needs to stick with what he knows best. Find new ways to screw up perfectly good computers. But I will say one positive thing about it. Better to give away food than sell guns. And ammo, which is over the amount of serviceable use of the gun, the ammo will be several times the amount you pay for the gun.

    As to the notion that Bolivia is no longer an agrarian society, maybe. But without food production your society or my society or their society will have to spend money paying other people to do the work.

    Maybe Mr and Mrs Gates could toss a few billion to bribe the state department to stop screwing with the mechanisms of Bolivian and Everybody-else-ian internal affairs.

  2. You gotta love Evo Morales. Bill Gates hands him a truckload of Chickens and Evo tells him to shove it where the sun don’t shine. Who else but Evo?

    If people like Bill and Melinda truly want to help poor people, they should stop using slave labor in China and India and produce there products in the Rust Belt. We’ve got a big empty factory right here in my hometown of Bellefonte, PA. We’ll make your f**king gadgets for you. Put up or shut up, uppity rich people. I’ll be here waiting and wishing we had a president more like Evo.

  3. next we are going to solve inner city poverty with ferrets.

    i know this will work because while i was growing up in a rich suburb i always thought to myself that if i was poor and living in the city i would raise ferrets.

    also they help empower women, because btchs love ferrets.

Comments are closed.