Gaza’s Future and Trump’s Bold Rhetoric: New Episode of the Kyle Anzalone Show

Dave DeCamp from Antiwar.com joins us for an eye-opening exploration of Middle Eastern politics. Former President Donald Trump has issued a stark warning about Gaza, claiming “all hell will break loose” if hostages aren’t released by his next tenure. Is this another of Trump’s infamous negotiation tactics, or a genuine threat? We’ll question the implications of his comments, especially considering the high improbability of U.S. military intervention in Gaza due to Israel’s own formidable capabilities. Together with Dave, we’ll scrutinize the dire conditions already present in Gaza and ponder what further escalation might entail.

Our conversation doesn’t stop there. The complex web of U.S. military presence in Syria and the involvement of key regional players like Turkey and Israel creates a dynamic backdrop for our discussion. We dissect President Erdogan’s geopolitical ambitions and the tensions between Israel and northern Syrian factions, including the U.S.-backed Kurds. The episode also touches on Trump’s potential strategies regarding troop withdrawal from Syria and unwavering support for Israel. Finally, we delve into the concerns about possible U.S. support for Israeli military actions against Iran, alongside President Zelensky’s remarks on military aid to Ukraine, highlighting the intricate balance of financial and military assistance.

Attacking Iran Would Be Wrong and Illegal

Richard Nephew thinks that the case against attacking Iran isn’t as strong as it used to be:

But today, the case against military action is not so neat.

If anything, the case against attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities is stronger than it has ever been. It is because Iran’s nuclear program has advanced so far that we have no reason to believe that military action would be successful. Because Iran is more vulnerable than it has been in the recent past, that makes it more likely that an attack would spur the Iranian government to pursue nuclear weapons as a deterrent. When a government feels more threatened than before but has more advanced capabilities for developing these weapons, that is a terrible time to make their fears of attack a reality. Thanks in large part to the stupidity and malice of hawks in the U.S. and Israel, Tehran’s incentives to acquire nuclear weapons have increased. That is why we should reject a military option that gives Iran an even bigger incentive to cross that line.

Continue reading “Attacking Iran Would Be Wrong and Illegal”