In order to evaluate the aftermath of Sept. 11,
we first must understand that event. What did al-Qaeda intend to achieve? Only
if we understand that can we gauge their success or failure.
From the point of view of al-Qaeda, the Muslim world can and should be united
into a single country. They believe that it once had this political unity, under
the early caliphs. Even as late as the outbreak of World War I, the Ottoman
state ruled much of the Middle East, and the Ottoman sultans had begun making
claims to be caliphs (Muslim popes) from about 1880. In the below map, blue
indicates heavy Muslim populations, green means medium, and yellow means the
Muslims are a significant minority.
From al-Qaeda's point of view, the political unity of the Muslim world was
deliberately destroyed by a one-two punch. First, Western colonial powers invaded
Muslim lands and detached them from the Ottoman Empire or other Muslim states.
They ruled them brutally as colonies, reducing the people to little more than
slaves serving the economic and political interests of the British, French,
Russians, etc. France invaded Algeria in 1830. Great Britain took Egypt in 1882
and Iraq in 1917. Russia took the Emirate of Bukhara and other Central Asian
territories in the 1860s and forward. Second, they formed these colonies into
Western-style nation-states, often small and weak ones, so that the divisive
effects of the colonial conquests have lasted. (Look at the British Empire and
its imposition on much of the Muslim world in the map below.)
The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was not an unprecedented event from the
point of view of bin Laden and his followers. Far from it. It was only the latest
in a long series of Western predations in Muslim lands. The British had conquered
Palestine, Jordan and Iraq, and had unilaterally opened Palestine to Jewish
immigration, with the colonized Palestinians unable to object. The Russians
had taken the Caucasus and Chechnya in the early nineteenth century, and had
so brutally repressed the Muslims under their rule that they probably killed
hundreds of thousands and expelled even more to the Ottoman Empire (now Turkey).
From al-Qaeda's point of view, the Soviet attempt to absorb Afghanistan was
the beginning of the end of the colonial venture. They demonstrated that even
a superpower can be forced to withdraw from a Muslim land if sufficient guerrilla
pressure is put on it.
Bin Laden sees the Muslim world as continually invaded, divided and weakened
by outside forces. Among these are the Americans in Saudi Arabia and the Israelis
in geographical Palestine. He repeatedly complained about the occupation of
the three holy cities, i.e., Mecca, Medina and Jerusalem.
For al-Qaeda to succeed, it must overthrow the individual nation-states in
the Middle East, most of them colonial creations, and unite them into a single,
pan-Islamic state. But Ayman al-Zawahiri's organization, al-Jihad al-Islami,
had tried very hard to overthrow the Egyptian state, and was always checked.
Al-Zawahiri thought it was because of U.S. backing for Egypt. They believed
that the U.S. also keeps Israel dominant in the Levant and backs Saudi Arabia's
Al-Zawahiri then hit upon the idea of attacking the "far enemy" first. That
is, since the United States was propping up the governments of Egypt, Israel,
Jordan, Saudi Arabia, etc., all of which al-Qaeda wanted to overthrow so as
to meld them into a single, Islamic super-state, then it would hit the United
The attack on the World Trade Center was exactly analogous to Pearl Harbor.
The Japanese generals had to neutralize the U.S. fleet so that they could sweep
into Southeast Asia and appropriate Indonesian petroleum. The U.S. was going
to cut off imperial Japan from petroleum, and without fuel the Japanese could
not maintain their empire in China and Korea. So they pushed the U.S. out of
the way and took an alternative source of petroleum away from the Dutch (who
then ruled what later became Indonesia).
Likewise, al-Qaeda was attempting to push the United States out of the Middle
East so that Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Saudi Arabia would become more vulnerable
to overthrow, lacking a superpower patron. Secondarily, the attack was conceived
as revenge on the United States and American Jews for supporting Israel and
the severe oppression of the Palestinians. Bin Laden wanted to move the timing
of the operation up to spring of 2001 so as to "punish" the Israelis for their
actions against the Palestinians in the second Intifada. Khalid Sheikh Muhammad
was mainly driven in planning the attack by his rage at Israel over the Palestinian
issue. Another goal is to destroy the U.S. economy, so weakening it that it
cannot prevent the emergence of the Islamic superpower.
Al-Qaeda wanted to build enthusiasm for the Islamic superstate among the Muslim
populace, to convince ordinary Muslims that the U.S. could be defeated and they
did not have to accept the small, largely secular, and powerless Middle Eastern
states erected in the wake of colonialism. Jordan's population, for instance,
is 5.6 million. Tunisia, a former French colony, is 10 million, less than Michigan.
Most Muslims have been convinced of the naturalness of the nation-state model
and are proud of their new nations, however small and weak. Bin Laden had to
do a big demonstration project to convince them that another model is possible.
Bin Laden hoped the U.S. would timidly withdraw from the Middle East. But
he appears to have been aware that an aggressive U.S. response to 9/11 was entirely
possible. In that case, he had a Plan B: al-Qaeda hoped to draw the U.S. into
a debilitating guerrilla war in Afghanistan and do to the U.S. military what
they had earlier done to the Soviets. Al-Zawahiri's
recent message shows that he still has faith in that strategy.
The U.S. cleverly outfoxed al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, using air power and local
Afghan allies (the Northern Alliance) to destroy the Taliban without many American
boots on the ground.
Ironically, however, the Bush administration then went on to invade Iraq for
no good reason, where Americans faced the kind of wearing guerrilla war they
had avoided in Afghanistan.
Al-Qaeda has succeeded in several of its main goals. It had been trying to
convince Muslims that the United States wanted to invade Muslim lands, humiliate
Muslim men, and rape Muslim women. Most Muslims found this charge hard to accept.
The Bush administration's Iraq invasion, along with the Abu Ghraib prison torture
scandal, was perceived by many Muslims to validate bin Laden's wisdom and foresight.
After the Iraq War, bin Laden is more popular than George W. Bush even in
a significantly secular Muslim country such as Turkey. This is a bizarre finding,
a weird turn of events. Turks didn't start out with such an attitude. It grew
up in reaction against U.S. policies.
It remains to be seen whether the U.S. will be forced out of Iraq the way
it was forced out of Iran in 1979. If so, as al-Zawahiri says, that will be
a huge victory. A recent opinion poll did find that over 80 percent of Iraqis
want an Islamic state. If Iraq goes Islamist, that will be the biggest victory
the movement has had since the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan. An Islamist
Iraq might well be able ultimately to form a joint state with Syria, starting
the process of the formation of the Islamic superstate of which bin Laden dreams.
If the Muslim world can find a way to combine the sophisticated intellectuals
and engineers of Damascus and Cairo with the oil wealth of the Persian Gulf,
it could well emerge as a 21st century superpower.
Bin Laden's dream of a united Muslim state under a revived caliphate may well
be impossible to accomplish. But with the secular Ba'ath gone, it could be one
step closer to reality. If you add to the equation the generalized hatred for
U.S. policies (both against the Palestinians and in Iraq) among Muslims, that
is a major step forward for al-Qaeda. In Saudi Arabia, al-Qaeda has emerged
as a dissident political party. Before it had just been a small group of Bin
Laden's personal acolytes in Afghanistan and a handful of other countries.
Although the United States and its Pakistani ally have captured significant
numbers of al-Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan and Pakistan, a whole new generation
of angry young Muslim men has been produced. Al-Qaeda has moved from being a
concrete cell-based terrorist organization to being an ideal and a model, for
small local groups in Casablanca, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and elsewhere.
The U.S. is not winning the war on terror. Al-Qaeda also has by no means won.
But across a whole range of objectives, al-Qaeda has accomplished more of its
goals than the U.S. has of its.