April 16, 2001
Kosovo’s
Grassy Knoll
A helicopter’s downing requires more explanation
CRASHING
OUT
On
Monday 9 April, two
British helicopter pilots were killed on a routine surveillance
mission in Kosovo. Bad weather had forced an emergency
landing, which went wrong meaning the helicopter crashed into
the mountains. The Ministry
of Defence insisted that there were "no
indications whatsoever that hostile action was involved".
BAD
SMELL
Here
the story should end. Two British servicemen died in a foreign country
where British interests were not involved. This may be a scandal,
but in our desensitised times we seem to think that only two
deaths are quite good. However there are a number of disturbing
points in this story, and although the Ministry of Defence version
is plausible, it is by no means the only version of the story that
is plausible. It is perfectly possible that the pilots were the
first casualties in a new
war, where Britain fights the KLA.
MULLING
IT OVER
The
first thing that jars is that the British Ministry of Defence is
quite adept at blaming helicopter crashes on the incompetence of
the crews, if the truth turns out to be more inconvenient. The most
famous example of this was a Chinook
crash over the Mull of Kintyre. This crash, which largely wiped
out the counter-terrorist intelligence capability in Northern Ireland,
was at first blamed on the pilots’ gross negligence, and this was
upheld in an internal investigation. This verdict was not accepted
by the dead pilots’ families,
who campaigned
for an independent inquiry, saying that the equipment was faulty.
Very few people now believe the official line, with even a
defence minister of the time calling for a re-evaluation. Why
was the defence hierarchy so insistent on the pilot’s negligence?
Many think that this was because the Ministry of Defence was keen
to avoid blame for buying faulty equipment. If the Ministry of Defence
were capable of a cover up in order not to admit to a mistake in
choosing their supplier, would they be equally keen to cover up
a mistake in choosing their ally?
STINGER
IN THE TAIL
Did
the Kosovo Liberation Army have the means, motive and the opportunity
to shoot down the helicopter? Firstly the means. This is simple;
the KLA had access
to stinger missiles and other anti-aircraft equipment from 1998.
BORDER
WAR
And
the motive? Surely, the KLA would have no motive to shoot down their
erstwhile liberators? How about Macedonia? The region where the
aircrew was shot down, Kacanik,
is on the border with Macedonia. The border is to most of the people
of Kacanik a trifling legality, as a
British major in the area said:
These
areas are populated with people related to each other, and they
have always been moving back and forth over these hills due to the
different seasons.
The
area is a highly important strategic area, if the KLA is to support
its Macedonian offshoot. The British
troops recognised Kacanik’s pivotal importance of the border
when they were preparing for an invasion from Macedonia. This major
highway of arms shipments to the Albanian militants in Kosovo
was a natural place for British troops to monitor, if they were
serious about stopping the Albanian rebels arming. Similarly, there
was a natural desire for the Albanians to be unmonitored. What better
way to stop the monitors than by shooting them down? After all,
KFOR troops have already been
shot at.
|