A
STARTLING DECLARATION
This
week, as the Democrat blitz continued, Dubya was equally
missing in action until Wednesday, when he turned up at
a photo op with Condi
Rice, his putative national security advisor, and announced
that he had just about settled on his White House staff.
Fresh from his second CIA intelligence briefing, Dubya made
a
rather startling declaration:
"I
have all the confidence in the world that the Clinton administration
and the next administration, which I hope is the Bush administration,
would do whatever it takes to send a chilling signal to
terrorists that we'll protect our property and our people.
The warning ought to be that, as we decide this election,
people ought not to take advantage of our nation."
DUBYA
SPILLS THE BEANS
Aside
from speculating about just what he learned at his briefing
session, one has to wonder what "property" is Dubya talking
about unless he means the whole of the Middle East.
And isn't it odd how property, in this equation, comes first,
with "our people" the 17 martyred sailors on board
the USS Cole come to mind a secondary consideration.
Parsing Dubya's pronouncements could be a thankless task,
if not an impossible one, but I suspect the reason we haven't
been seeing much of him is that his handlers don't trust
his natural spontaneity: they're afraid he might spill the
beans before they've had a chance to prepare the public
for whatever surprises might be in store. "Our property"?
And who, pray tell, is us? Surely he cannot mean
ordinary US taxpayers, who don't as a rule own a whole lot
of overseas real estate. This is what it means to have elected
what Ralph Nader rightly described as "not a person but
the equivalent of a giant corporation" to the US presidency:
"Our property" means the property of American and British
oil companies, and when Dubya moves into the White House
their interests will be equated with America's "national
interests."
FREE
ENTERPRISE AND THE MARINES
Not
that this isn't the operational principle of US foreign
policy, especially in the Middle East, already: The special
and longstanding relationship between US oil executives
and the Saudi monarchy, which has enriched Big Oil beyond
the dreams of avarice, is backed up by tens of thousands
of American soldiers and sailors stationed on or near Saudi
soil. For all their talk of "free enterprise" in America,
for the Republicans it is quite a different story abroad,
where government intervention in the form of the US Marines
is always welcomed. As
I pointed out on Wednesday, Dubya hasn't even taken
office yet and already the academic minions of certain US
corporate interests are beating the drums for war in the
Middle East, calling on the son to complete the job begun
by the father and take Baghdad. And there is every
indication that Dubya is champing at the bit for his chance
to prove himself worthy of the Bush legacy: We are at "a
very unique moment in American history to promote a foreign
policy that is bipartisan," said Dubya, as Condi nodded
eagerly beside him. In answer to questions about the likelihood
of a Republican victory in the court battles raging down
in Florida, he added "I hope we can get this over with quickly.
There's lots of work to be done." Desert
Storm II, here we come!
A
QUESTION OF LEGITIMACY
Here,
at last, is something Republicans and Democrats can agree
on: the necessity of going to war for the profits of Big
Oil. For President Bush, it would be a diversion away from
political divisions at home that could give him much-needed
legitimacy. He didn't quite win it at the polls: perhaps
he can win it on the battlefield. In this way, a new precedent
will be set, and the analogy with the old Roman Empire will
be complete. On account of his conquests, Dubya, like Caesar,
could win the crown and the accolades of the people. Few
would notice what had been lost.
YOU
TELL ME
It
will be a lot harder, however, to convince Republicans,
especially conservatives, that the enemy is Saddam Hussein
instead of Gore
and his fellow coup-plotters. If there is one thing
that Republicans, even the so-called moderates, have learned
from the past month is that the main enemy is at home.
Saddam Hussein may want to overthrow the American Constitution
and replace it with a Baathist-style
one-party dictatorship, but that can happen only in his
dreams. On the other hand, the dream of Al Gore to
reinvent the voting process, steal the presidency, and subvert
the Constitution may yet come true, and, if not,
he came mighty damn close. Now, you tell me,
who is the real threat Saddam or Gore?
THE
IRON LAW OF BUREAUCRACY
Ah,
yes, the glories of our "bipartisan foreign policy," as
Dubya glowingly puts it: whatever their differences over
domestic policy (and a Dubya administration may reveal that
these differences are vastly overstated) the essential unity
of the two parties on the foreign policy front is illustrated
by one of the favorite adages of our bipartisan statesmen:
"Politics ends at the water's edge." This is what makes
it possible for such cold war relics as "Radio
Free Europe" and "Radio Liberty" [RFE/RL] to continue
long after the implosion of Communism and the fall of the
Soviet Union. Founded at the height of the cold war to counter
Communist propaganda by broadcasting the US government line
overseas, Radio Free Europe and its satellites faced the
budget-cutters' axe when the Berlin Wall fell, but escaped
on account of bipartisan collusion and the logic that governs
all government agencies: a state bureaucracy, once established,
is never considered obsolescent, because its employees and
their patrons can always be mobilized to fight like hell
for the agency's continued existence. The cold war may be
over, but the national security apparatus it spawned is
alive and well and busy meddling and causing no end
of trouble.
DISSING
KOSTUNICA
So
what does RFE/RFL do, now that the Communist Menace has
shrunk to the diminutive dimensions of Mirjana
Markovic, Slobodan Milosevic's wife and leader of the
neo-Communist Yugoslav Left Party? Why, what else
but attack the anti-Communist government of Vojislav
Kostunica, who led a popular uprising against the last Stalinists
in Europe? In
a December 1 broadcast, which sneeringly starts off
by asking is it "the end of history in the Balkans?,"
the RFE/RFL announcer disdainfully remarks that
"Scarcely
a week or even a few days go by as of late without some
Western politician or group of politicians waxing eloquent
about Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica and his allies
from the Democratic Opposition of Serbia (DOS). The Westerners
routinely hail the fall of dictatorship in Serbia and birth
of democracy there. Some observers even suggest that Serbia
and the Balkans have ceased to be an international trouble
spot, and that the West can best deal with them through
"soft" institutions such as the EU's Balkan Stability Pact
rather than through NATO or the UN. Some in the US have
added that Washington can safely consign the region to the
care of Brussels and concentrate on its own interests in
other parts of the globe."
NO
END OF TROUBLE
It
is the one inflexible rule of US foreign policy that both
parties endorse: the trouble never ends. There is always
someone, be it the Serbs, or the Iraqis, or the Russians,
or the Colombians, who dares to defy the diktat of
Uncle Sam. In that case, they are quickly discovered to
be the reincarnation of Hitler and their country is deemed
a "rogue nation," or a "nation of concern," as Madeleine
Albright's State Department likes to put it. (One imagines
that Colin Powell and his crew will reinstate the "rogue"
terminology). Once a "trouble spot" always a "trouble
spot" why else do we have troops in Germany and Japan,
for god's sake, more than 50 years after the end of World
War II? What are US soldiers doing guarding the Korean DMZ,
as if frozen in time, still ready to fight an enemy that
has long since been defeated?
WESTERN
SERBOPHILIA?
Don't
imagine for a moment that they're going to let the Serbs
off that easy oh no you don't! According to
RFE/RFL, the US appears to be discriminating in favor of
the Serbs. Forget the US bombs that fell and killed over
5,000 citizens of Yugoslavia; forget the sanctions, that
killed and crippled more; there is "the perception that
the Westerners are suddenly falling all over themselves
to give large sums of money and other aid to Serbia." The
Bosnians, Kosovars, and other US clients in the regions
"shake their heads in disbelief." The Serbs, complain their
enemies in the Balkans, are having an easy time of it: they
are getting
"into
the international community's good books without having
had to meet the painstaking prerequisites for democracy,
market reforms, human rights, and cooperation with the Hague-based
war crimes tribunal that some of its neighbors have. Croatian
President Stipe Mesic, for one, has frequently tried to
remind the Westerners that the changes in Serbia have only
just begun, and that one should not be so generous or trusting
until one better knows with whom and what one is actually
dealing."
SUBVERSION
BY IMPLICATION
The
main concern of RFE/RFL is to echo the would-be Robespierre
of the Yugoslav revolution, Zoran
Djindic, who has called for purging the Yugoslav army:
Kostunica may have "a refreshing devotion to the rule of
law," but such niceties mean little according to
US government propagandists if the same generals
who fought NATO to a standstill are allowed to stay in command.
Kostunica is described as a man with "strong nationalist
credentials," the "Not-Milosevic," and the DOS is described
as "nominally committed to democracy" with the clear
implication that this could all be an illusion, or even
a trick.