and Good Luck
Reese states: "Since we stupidly decided to have an all-volunteer Army,
we can't afford too much cannon fodder."
Is it Mr. Reese's
position that the United States should have a drafted army, rather than an all-volunteer
I would like to
think that, as a man of uncompromising principle on the issues of liberty and
private property rights, Mr. Reese would not be advocating slavery (because
that is exactly what a draft is).
of oneself is the ultimate private property right. If a man is not supposed
to own his own life and body, then certainly the issue of private property rights
and liberty is dead.
I frequently read
Mr. Reese's articles, and am in agreement with much not all of his writings.
I may have misunderstood Mr. Reese's thoughts, or he may have stated them poorly.
Trap of Recognizing Israel
Cook's view that a Jewish democracy cannot be a true democracy relies on a very
narrow vision of how democracy should work.
If a democracy
builds a fence around its border, it is still a democracy. If a democracy chooses
to implement policies that will reduce the influx of people that have voted
for a racist and terroristic group, which wants to destroy their state, to wipe
it off the map, then it is still a democracy. If a democracy performs military
strikes against terrorist targets which attack it, and occupies the zones controlled
by those terrorists in a militarily strategic way, it is still a democracy.
People like Cook
dream about grouping Israel with South Africa simply because it would replace
rational thinking about Israel with an emotional opposition to it based on a
Why is Israel
a democracy? Because people vote and elect a diverse (both ethnically and politically)
array of representatives. In addition, minorities in the Israeli democracy have
a higher quality of life than minorities in any of the surrounding Arab dictatorships.
Criticism of Israel
is generally beneficial to the Middle East conflicts, because it increases dialogue
and strengthens the case for a less interventionist United States in the region.
However, the scapegoating practiced by some anti-Zionists goes way overboard,
as can be seen by Cook's ridiculous article.
~ Ben Greenberg
is interesting that even most Israeli political scientists do not believe Israel
is a democracy in the normal sense of the word. The main debate among academics
here is whether the country is an ethnic democracy (a very unusual and hybrid
form of democracy that, in their view, just slips in under the net) or an ethnocracy,
a non-democratic state.
Ben, like most
apologists for Israel, keeps moving the goalposts. His "fence" and
his suicide bombers come from a group of Palestinians living under an illegal
occupation in the West Bank and Gaza who are entitled under international law
to wage a resistance struggle to end that occupation. In discussing Israel's
democratic pretensions, we are speaking only of Israel's treatment of its 1.2
million Palestinian citizens. They have been quiescent for six decades and live
inside the internationally recognized borders of Israel. So why are they excluded
by the state's definition of itself as a Jewish state?
Let me restate:
there is no Israeli nationality recognized in Israel. That is because Israel
is officially the state of the Jews, not Israelis. Imagine living in a United
States that called itself the state of the Christians and allowed citizens not
to identify themselves as Americans, but only as a Christians, Jews, and Muslims.
Would we want to call such a state democratic? Well, that is the situation in
Israel, and from that simple fact alone flows much of the discrimination exercised
in Israeli law that makes the Jewish state very similar to the apartheid state
of South Africa.
Ben makes much
of the fact that everyone votes in Israel. True, but that's a very easy generosity
on Israel's part when its non-Jewish citizens that is, its Palestinian
citizens comprise only a fifth of the population. South Africa would
doubtless have been able to give the vote to blacks if they were only that proportion
of South Africa's electorate. More important in Israel's case is the decision
taken by every coalition government in Israel's history, including national
unity governments, to exclude Palestinian parties. In the latest development,
Israel's secret police, the Shin Bet, have admitted that they are using covert
means to prevent Palestinian parties from seeking Israel's reform into a liberal
democracy. That view has the sanction of the attorney general. In other words,
it is actually considered subversion in Israel to want democracy.
is this Sam Karpov guy who posts letters in favor of Israel's involvement in
the USS Liberty attack? Why aren't you commenting on the letters, either?
I have read what
the survivors of the attack stated and think Karpov is full of crap. He appears
to be using the technique of constant repetition of a lie to get it accepted
primarily up to the writers to comment on letters that criticize them. As letters
editor, though, I can speak to the appropriateness of posting Sam Karpov's two
recent letters. They contain specific criticism, regarding matters of fact,
description, and interpretation: just the sort of thing that a letters section
called "Backtalk" should include. And they do not express opinions "in favor
of Israel's involvement in the USS Liberty attack." Karpov describes
the attack as a case of mistaken identity, and a mistake is by definition something
that should not have happened.
Martyr of Mosul
sympathize absolutely it is a tragedy, at least it is reasonably well
publicized, presumably because of the loss of Catholic churches.
The medieval Serbian
Orthodox Christian heritage in Kosovo, most of which is supposed to be protected
by UNESCO, is being systematically destroyed under the noses of KFOR troops
by Albanian terrorists, yet there is little if any public outcry (presumably
because Albanian terrorists are "our" terrorists)!
This is happening
in the heart of Europe right now, not in some desolate war zone.
I enjoy Mr. Buchanan's
articles very much, and it gives me some hope knowing that not everyone on the
other side of the pond is mad!
~ Nick Brajkovich,
and Fall of the Bizarro Empire
[T]he estimated cost, now considered conservative,
of the Iraq invasion is $2,000,000,000,000, which equals $80,000 for each of
Iraq's 25,000,000 citizens. With estimated petroleum reserves of 115,000,000,000
barrels, this is a $17-per-barrel American taxpayer subsidy to the oil companies
for oil still in the ground. Permanent occupation, which is the plan, will only
increase this American taxpayer subsidy to the oil companies, who are recording
record profits, with the U.S. military providing them permanent protection at
taxpayer expense. How sweet is that? Democrats and Republicans alike don't seem
to oppose these plans or explain them to the American taxpaying public, WHO
THEY HAVE DEEMED TO NOT HAVE A NEED TO KNOW WHAT IS DONE WITH THEIR TAX MONEY.
This is the Bizarro
~ Ken Lusk