On
the anniversary of 9/11, newspapers throughout China ran front page
photos of the burning Towers many with an inset depicting
mourning Americans. Articles focused on America’s War on Terrorism,
the anguish of the victims’ familis and the few Chinese nationals
that died in the attack.
The
newspapers tended to be very sympathetic toward the victims and
their families and condemned terrorism and terrorist attacks in
general, while mentioning China’s own "struggle" with
the "determined and dangerous" East Turkestan Islamic
Movement and their ilk in Xinjiang, far to the West. The People’s
Daily ran a series of articles analysing the current political
situation between the "Alliance against Terrorism,"the
social and political changes in America since the attack and the
economic depression that makes it so hard to find a job in the States
these days. The series also spoke in length on the effects of US
unilateralism which arose out of America’s "anger and
sense of moral purpose" and which also threatens to
tear apart the fragile alliance. Specifically, the relationship
between Russia and the EU, the rematch of the Great Game in the
former CIS and of course the increasingly unbridgable gap between
the Middle East and the West (more specifically, the US.)
China’s
role in the New War was downplayed except for the political victory
in Xinjiang, which is a major coup for the government and stories
concerning Chinese dealt mostly with shows of condolence and solidarity
with the victims. On the street, the attitudes toward the US, 9/11
and the New War are complex and, to many foreigners in China, just
short of infuriating.
The
less educated seem to have no qualms mentioning "Xiao Bush,
Iraq and 9/11" to the first foreigner they meet. To someone
who has not heard of the various "smiles" (embarrassment
and mirth, to name two) in China, a shirtless worker giggling
as he screams out jiu yao yao! (9/11) or Bin Laden! can be
very provocative and hard to comprehend. But when I take the time
and effort to respond, the smiling bellows turn out to be as much
a way of communicating with a foreigner as an actual attempt to
goad an angry reaction. It isn’t very "chinese" to provoke
someone into anger so these comments I take in stride, as I take
every "hello" and "laowai!" (foreigner!)
that comes my way.
Nevertheless,
I can’t help but wonder what they would say if I wasn’t able to
speak Chinese: an attitude of "deserved retribution" does
exist and no matter how much I despise governments and their deadly
policies, I can’t help but feel a nationalistic surge of rage when
I someone asks me about 9/11 with a smile on their lips.
The
past couple of days in class, the kids brought cut-out photos of
the Twin Towers in flames and begged me to discuss the incident
with them. They too yell out jiu yao yao and Bin Laden and
wait eagerly for me to respond in some way. Unfortunately, these
kids laugh hard at pretty much any response and they do seem to
want to see my anger. But before I get frustrated, I think about
the way I reacted to Reagan’s bombing of Libya back in the day:
I drew a blob on a piece of paper which was supposed to be Libya
and repeatedly destroyed it with pencil bombs. Laughing all the
time. And again, for most of these kids, just having a foreign teacher
is a riot and to be able to have something in common, even something
like death in destruction, is great fun.
The
somewhat educated follow "typical" lines of decorum and
respect and mention the attack only if I have mentioned it first.
And if we do begin to discuss it, nobody is smiling until I start
making fun of Bush and his Band of Puppeteers, which I do quite
often. These discussions often turn to the seemingly inevitable
strike on Iraq and US unilateralism. I take this line of thinking
as a sly man’s way of expressing the attitude of "deserved
retribution."
It
helps to remember that US-China relations up to the attack were
at an all-time low after weapons deals to Taiwan, the visit of a
high-ranking Taiwanese official, various Falun Gong demonstrations
involving foreigners, US anger over China-Everybody arms deals and
of course the Hainan Incident. The death of several thousand people
is nothing to the Chinese several of my friends have pointed
out how much the Americans value American life and sympathy
for a rival only goes so far, especially since the Bush Administration
has reversed the Clinton Era rhetoric toward China from partner
to competitior.
The
People’s Daily also reproted on Chinese visiting the US embassy
in Beijing and laying wreaths, expressing condolences. This attitude
is also very palpable on the street: a very genuine regret for the
loss of life and the abhorrence of terrorist attacks. Last year,
many friends called up and told me they didn’t like Bush but they
hated Bin Laden and what he stands for. This year I haven’t heard
it yet.
Which
brings me to the vast majority of Chinese: those who are happy to
be in China, away from the New War and out of the "with us
or against us" spotlight. This may be the new middle-class
in China which is busy enjoying life and waiting for their children
outside of the expensive private school. The class of people who
have a nice two bedroom apartment with a DVD player and perhaps
even a car; they eat good and save money, go on vacations and their
kids have a chance to go to Shanghai or Beijing to work, perhaps
even abroad. The middle class in China is growing and they are taking
on the same characteristics of middle class people all over the
world: they take an interest in politics because they are educated
enough to understand and analyse, but the less it affects their
own lives and new found prosperity, the better. These people know
the right things to say, but after they say them, they forget about
it and head back home to the air conditioner and western toilet.
Throughout
the western world, from New Zealand to Spain, people and officials
turned out and expressed their sympathy for New York with songs,
banners and speeches. The Not-So-Western World had no such parades.
The reason probably lies in a (not-so) secret satisfaction that
the West "got theirs" for once.
The
scope of this sentiment is difficult to assess: widespread or isolated?
serious or joking? malicious or mischievious? But to deny that a
great number of people in this world felt no sadness whatsoever
yesterday is to deny the great and deep underlying problems in our
"New World Order" that caused the attack in the first
place and will probably precipitate others in the future.
-Sascha
Matuszak
Please
Support Antiwar.com
Send
contributions to
Antiwar.com
520 South Murphy Avenue, Suite #202
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
or
Contribute Via our Secure Server
Credit Card Donation Form
Your
contributions are now tax-deductible
|
Sascha Matuszak
is a teacher living and working in China. His articles have appeared
in the South China Morning Post, the Minnesota Daily,
and elsewhere. His exclusive Antiwar.com column (usually) appears
Fridays.
Archived
columns
Deciphering
the Chinese Smile
9/13/02
Why
China Can Disregard US Anger
9/7/02
Arming
the World: What the US Fears
8/30/02
What
Taiwanese Fear
8/23/02
What
Military Might?
7/26/02
Protection
7/10/02
Ties
That Bind
6/21/02
Tight
Spot
6/6/02
Fake
Friendships
3/28/02
1.3
Billion Problems For China
3/8/02
China's
New Post-9/11 Status
2/21/02
Soybeans
2/1/02
Patriotism
1/25/02
Room for Growth
1/19/02
No Peacemaker
1/11/02
Back in the USA
1/4/02
Missing the Boat?
12/14/01
Sweep 'Em Off the Streets
12/7/01
Chinese Embrace Progress
11/30/01
Risk
and Promise
11/9/01
Standing
Aloof?
11/5/01
China's
Afghan Agenda
10/26/01
New
War May Reveal New Superpower, Part II
10/9/01
New
War May Reveal New Superpower
10/3/01
A
Chance for a New Friendship?
9/25/01
Watching
the Disaster
9/18/01
Cheating
as a Way of Life
9/11/01
China's
Internet Generation
9/4/01
China's
Expansionism
8/28/01
Free
Markets or Supermarkets
8/14/01
Trailblazing
8/7/01
Too
Much Face
7/27/01
Olympic
Pie
7/19/01
Culture
of Pollution
7/10/01
Sailing
Towards World Significance
7/3/01
China's
Youth Revolution
6/19/01
China
on the Road to Capitalism
6/5/01
An
American in China
5/15/01
On
the Street in China: A Report
4/13/01
|