I,
along with many other columnists and reporters, have had a good
time poking fun at Jiang and his New Theory in the past few months.
Jiang’s own bluster plus the solemn, blatant propaganda churned
out by the Chinese media has kept us all laughing. A few have taken
the theory seriously and tried hard to bring the innovations therein
to the Western masses.
Chinese
are laughing, too. At least the ones walking the streets and shouldering
the burdens of the newest class of CCP members, the Characteristically
Capitalist Socialists that roam the countryside in search of profits,
connections and power—not unlike the railroad barons of the Wild
West, no matter what Jiang calls them. Many of the workers and small-timers
of China have been CCP members for a long time, or their parents
were. Or brothers, uncles, roommates ... The good it has brought
them pales in comparison with the reapings of the long-time corrupt,
violent, morally dubious wholehearted devotees to Western Liberalism:
the CCS.
What
must an old blue-suit wearing veteran of marches, wars, starvations,
criticism sessions, and revolutions think when he sees that which
he fought, was told to despise and root out has become the eminent
power in China? The barons of modern China have forced the abdication
of the Last Emperor and inserted themselves into the seat of power.
Not that this is a new development in China or elsewhere. The rich
and connected tend to rule. But for the last 50 years in China,
millions of people died to keep "the people" in control.
The
Three Represents Theory is being sold as the next step on the path
called "Socialism with Chinese Characteristics." Jiang
Zemin’s great success in the international area and in the economic
sphere (where the rich and powerful dwell) is the foundation upon
which support for the theory must be based. China, in order to modernize,
must be internationally active, as well as having rising GDPs and
FDIs, improving export-import ratios and Big Games in which Chinese
Big Stars are playing.
Private
enterprise is the engine that drives international acclaim and economic
growth, so it only makes sense to include those with private property
in the Grand Party. They are doing so much for China and
Chinese ...
Jiang’s
theory has actually done (and probably will continue to do) nothing.
He has stated the obvious and attempted to take credit: "We
have lost power, but we wanted it to happen." Just as international
success and Big Games diverts attention from domestic hardship,
so Jiang’s self-congratulations divert attention from a capitalist
reality to a socialist-Chinese illusion.
It
All Comes Together ...
Jiang
takes credit for economic development, increased freedom and international
standing and defends the coup of the capitalists with a Theory meant
to usher the Party into a new era, an era in which every man is
for himself and still represented by the Party. He then steps down.
If enough people believe him, they might even believe his theory
and hope for an even greater increase in the standard of living
with the businessmen leading the way, dropping crumbs for the masses
as they strut.
Power
is decentralized and the institution of Emperor is gradully dissolved.
Even if Jiang rules from behind a curtain, he cannot match the stature
and power of his predecessors, therefore he will also not gain an
equal amount of glory, or suffer an equal amount of blame when ...
The
House of Cards comes falling down on "Who" Jintao who
steps into a weaker position than his mentors vis-à-vis the
Provinces, the Rich and The People. The first two will try to use
and manipulate him and the last one doesn’t respect or believe him,
yet.
"Who"
does have some cards up his sleeve. First, the fact that little
is known about him leaves him with a vast array of options to choose
from. Second, he was first mentored by Hu Yaobang: Hero of the People,
The Mourned One, Mentor of Zhao Ziyang, who himself may yet become
a martyr in his old age. Third, Deng himself appointed the man.
That means a lot.
Who
was also tutored by Song Ping and Jiang Zeming, both conservatives
at heart. He spent time in backward provinces like Gansu and Tibet.
This may give him insight into dealing with unemployed, dirt poor,
angry Chinese when the time comes. He has a little experience in
putting down rebellions (Tibet 1988-89), which is good for any Chinese
Premier to have. Who knows what connections Who has in the inland
Provinces where the most people with the least money live?
So
the Great Theory is a smokescreen. China may yet dodge domestic
turmoil by keeping the police as busy as they are now, letting the
Black Hands and businessmen do their thing (maybe even enlisting
them in a few suppression operations) and keeping the commoners
happy with a bit of dance and game, more construction to marvel
at, a few extra RMB in the pocket and of course an earful of propaganda
to tune out.
What
Who will not survive is international trouble. And this, unfortunately
for him, is very likely. The US doesn’t seem too interested in letting
bygones be bygones and letting the Iraqi people live without explosions
for a while. And a war in Iraq hurts everybody who depends on oil.
Which means basically everybody.
Let’s
say the war goes quick. And no terrorists rear their heads at all.
And the Arab world just prays their way through Ramadan.
Who
will be in the best position to grab the oil resources of Iraq?
The US, with its army, most likely. With Turkey, The Balkans, The
Central -stans and then Iraq under its sway, the US would just about
link all the resources in the Asian landmass together. Not a happy
scenario for Russia and China who have big money in Iraq and big
projects that are unfinished, or unstarted. Encirclement, Pacification,
Occupation, Development, Profit. Might just work.
Now.
Let’s say the war takes a couple of months. Americans die, oilfields
burn, Muslims let out a collective "Allah Akbar" and the
Middle East and/or World goes up in flames. Terrorists bomb anything
they can.
China
imports 2 million barrels of oil a day. Russia can’t afford to dig
into Siberian ice and can really not afford to lose Middle East
oil. These two may have to choose between Uncle Sam’s Folly and
their own political and economic lives. What will Who do?
-Sascha
Matuszak
comments
on this article?
|
|
Please
Support Antiwar.com
Send
contributions to
Antiwar.com
520 South Murphy Avenue, Suite #202
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
or
Contribute Via our Secure Server
Credit Card Donation Form
Your
contributions are now tax-deductible
|
Sascha Matuszak
is a teacher living and working in China. His articles have appeared
in the South China Morning Post, the Minnesota Daily,
and elsewhere. His exclusive Antiwar.com column (usually) appears
Fridays.
Archived
columns
Jiang's
Theory Is a Smokescreen
11/15/02
The
Last Emperor
11/8/02
'We
Make You Play Bad Card'
10/25/02
The
Future of East-West Rapprochement
10/16/02
Lamenting
Funk Street
10/4/02
Tiananmen's
Legacy: The Forgotten Rebellion
9/21/02
Deciphering
the Chinese Smile
9/13/02
Why
China Can Disregard US Anger
9/7/02
Arming
the World: What the US Fears
8/30/02
What
Taiwanese Fear
8/23/02
What
Military Might?
7/26/02
Protection
7/10/02
Ties
That Bind
6/21/02
Tight
Spot
6/6/02
Fake
Friendships
3/28/02
1.3
Billion Problems For China
3/8/02
China's
New Post-9/11 Status
2/21/02
Soybeans
2/1/02
Patriotism
1/25/02
Room for Growth
1/19/02
No Peacemaker
1/11/02
Back in the USA
1/4/02
Missing the Boat?
12/14/01
Sweep 'Em Off the Streets
12/7/01
Chinese Embrace Progress
11/30/01
Risk
and Promise
11/9/01
Standing
Aloof?
11/5/01
China's
Afghan Agenda
10/26/01
New
War May Reveal New Superpower, Part II
10/9/01
New
War May Reveal New Superpower
10/3/01
A
Chance for a New Friendship?
9/25/01
Watching
the Disaster
9/18/01
Cheating
as a Way of Life
9/11/01
China's
Internet Generation
9/4/01
China's
Expansionism
8/28/01
Free
Markets or Supermarkets
8/14/01
Trailblazing
8/7/01
Too
Much Face
7/27/01
Olympic
Pie
7/19/01
Culture
of Pollution
7/10/01
Sailing
Towards World Significance
7/3/01
China's
Youth Revolution
6/19/01
China
on the Road to Capitalism
6/5/01
An
American in China
5/15/01
On
the Street in China: A Report
4/13/01
|