Today (December 1), a surreal event will take
place in the center of London. The Foreign Office is holding an open day "to
highlight the importance of Human Rights in our work as part of the 60th
anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights." There will be
various "stalls" and "panel discussions" and Foreign Secretary
David Miliband will present a human rights prize. Is this a spoof? No. The Foreign
Office wants to raise our "human rights awareness." Kafka and Heller
have many counterfeits.
There will be no stall for the Chagos islanders, the 2,000 British citizens
expelled from their Indian Ocean homeland, whom Miliband’s government has fought
to prevent from returning to what is now a US military base and suspected CIA
torture center. The High Court has repeatedly restored this fundamental human
right to the islanders, the essence of Magna Carta, describing the Foreign Office
actions as "outrageous," "repugnant" and "illegal."
No matter. Miliband’s lawyers refused to give up and were rescued on 22 October
by the transparently political judgments of three law lords.
There will be no stall for the victims of a systemic British policy of exporting
arms and military equipment to ten out of 14 of Africa’s most war-bloodied and
impoverished countries. In his speech today, with the good people of Amnesty
and Save the Children in attendance, shamefully, what will Miliband say to the
sufferers of this British-sponsored violence? Perhaps he will make mention,
as he often does, of the need for "good governance" in faraway places
while his own regime suppresses a Serious Fraud Office investigation into BAE’s
£43 arms deals with the corrupt tyranny in Saudi Arabia – with which, noted
the Foreign Office Minister Kim Howells in 2007, the British had "shared
There will be no stall for those Iraqis whose social, cultural and real lives
have been smashed by an unprovoked invasion based on proven lies. Will the foreign
secretary apologize for the cluster bombs the British have scattered, still
blowing legs off children, and the depleted uranium and other toxics that have
seen cancer consume swathes of southern Iraq? Will he speak about the universal
human right to knowledge and announce a diversion of a fraction of the billions
bailing out the City of London to the restoration of what was one of the finest
school systems in the Middle East, obliterated as a consequence of the Anglo-American
invasion, along with museums and publishing houses and bookstores, and teachers
and historians and anthropologists and surgeons? Will he announce the dispatch
of simple painkillers and syringes to hospitals that once had almost everything
and now have nothing, in a country where British governments, especially his
own, took the lead in blocking humanitarian aid, including Kim Howells’ ban
on vaccines to protect children from preventable diseases?
There will be no stall for the people of Gaza of whom, says the International
Red Cross, starvation threatens the majority, mostly children. In pursuing a
policy of reducing one and a half million people to a Hobbesian existence, the
Israelis have cut most lifelines. David Miliband was in Jerusalem recently within
a short helicopter flight of the captive people of Gaza. He did not go and said
nothing about their human rights, preferring weasel words about a "truce"
between tormentor and victims.
There will be no stall for the trade unionists, students, journalists and human
rights defenders assassinated in Colombia, a country where the government’s
"security forces" are trained by the British and Americans and responsible
for 90 per cent of torture, says a new study by the British human rights group,
Justice for Colombia. The Foreign Office says it is "improving the human
rights record of the military and combating drug trafficking." The study
finds not a shred of evidence to support this. Colombian officers implicated
in murder are welcomed to Britain for "seminars."
There will be no stall for history, for our memory. Stored in the great British
libraries and record offices, unclassified official files tell the truth about
British policy and human rights, from officially condoned atrocities in the
concentration camps of colonial Kenya and the arming of the genocidal General
Suharto in Indonesia, to the supply of and biological weapons to Saddam Hussein
in the 1980s. As we hear the moralizing drone of ex British military "security
experts" telling us what to think about terrible events in Mumbai, we might
recall Britain’s historic role as midwife to violent extremism in modern Islam,
from the rise of the Moslem brotherhood in Egypt in the 1950s and the overthrow
of Iran’s liberal democratic government to MI6’s arming of the Afghan muhijadeen,
the Taliban in waiting. The aim was, and remains, the denial of nationalism
to peoples struggling to be free, especially in the Middle East where oil, says
a secret Foreign Office document from 1947, is "a vital prize for any power
interested in world influence and domination." Human rights are almost
entirely absent from this official memory, unlike fear of being found out. The
secret expulsion of the Chagos islanders, says a 1964 Foreign Office memorandum
of guidance, "should be timed to attract the least attention and should
have some logical cover [so as not to] arouse suspicions as to their purpose."
How is this wonderland perpetuated? The media play its historic role, following
the line of power, censoring by omission. Roland Challis, who was the BBC’s
southeast Asia correspondent when Suharto was slaughtering hundreds of thousands
of alleged communists in the 1960s, told me, "It was a triumph for western
propaganda. My British sources purported not to know what was going on, but
they knew … British warships escorted a ship full of Indonesian troops down
the Malacca Straits so they could take part in this terrible holocaust."
Today, public relations propaganda dressed up as scholarship promotes the same
rapacious British power while seeking to fix the boundaries of public discussion.
A report was released last week by the Institute for Public Policy Research
which describes itself as "the UK’s leading progressive think tank."
Having been emptied of its dictionary meaning, the once noble term, "progressive,"
joins "democracy" and "center-left" as deception. Lord George
Robertson, the New Labour warmonger, Trident devotee and ex-NATO boss, has his
moniker at the front, along with Paddy Ashdown, ex viceroy of the Balkans. Couched
in crisis management clichés, the IPPR report ("Shared Destinies")
is a "call to action" because "weak, corrupt and failing states
have become bigger security risks than strong, competitive ones." With
western state terror unmentionable, the "call" is for NATO in Africa
and military intervention "if deemed necessary." There is a nod to
the "perception" that the current Anglo-American "intervention"
in Muslim lands beckons terrorism in Britain: that which is blindingly obvious
to most people. In February 2003, almost 80 per cent of Londoners surveyed said
they believed that a British attack on Iraq "would make a terrorist attack
on London more likely." This was precisely the warning given Blair by the
Joint Intelligence Committee. The warning is no less urgent while "we"
continue to assault other people’s countries and allow false champions to steal
the human rights of us all.