When the MSM Failed Us on Iraq, the New Media Was Born

When the media becomes a sounding board for government officials to broadcast "talking points," America goes off the rails as it did when we invaded and occupied Iraq.

Over and over we were told that Iraq had links to al-Qaeda and the 9/11 attacks, not to mention huge stockpiles of WMDs. Anyone who contested the conventional wisdom was considered fringe. As certainty about these claims evaporated, so did the credibility of much of American journalism.

As Bill Moyers pointed out in a recent PBS documentary, the media went along with the mythmakers who lied us into war. Government pronouncements were subjected to only perfunctory scrutiny before being repeated endlessly. To this day, great numbers of Americans believe Saddam Hussein plotted the 9/11 attacks.

While the mainstream media caved, the journals of the new, online media were skeptical, and none more so than Antiwar.com. That's why we're part of the new mainstream.

Take a look at this list of the top 10 sites for political news this election season: Antiwar.com is number 10. The old mainstream is nowhere to be found.

We have succeeded where the major media has failed and not just because we're taking advantage of a new technology. We stood our ground when it counted, and our credibility is based on our solid record. Antiwar.com isn't just a cause it's a resource, an unparalleled online repository of knowledge and analysis at your fingertips. And it's free.

Except it really isn't. We must raise at least $70,000 to make it through this quarter. This is a bare-bones operation by any standard, but it does require funds. Your tax-deductible donation goes a long way toward ensuring our continued survival. Without your support, all the credibility and "Top 10" listings in the world won't permit us to continue so send your contribution today.

Sorry for the interruption.
Continue to Antiwar.com