Ron
Paul Applauds Congressional Restrictions on Patriot Act
|
|
|||
Congressman Ron Paul praised two landmark votes in Congress that could mark a turning point in the battle to protect civil liberties threatened by the Patriot Act. Paul has been an outspoken critic of the Patriot Act since its hasty passage in the weeks following the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The Act endangers civil liberties by easing federal rules for search warrants, allowing warrantless searches in some instances, allowing expanded wiretaps and internet monitoring, and even allowing federal agents to examine library and bookstore records. Yet despite these serious constitutional questions, few if any members of Congress read the 500-page Patriot Act prior to voting on it! However, the House of Representatives recently passed two amendments to the annual Justice department funding bill that show many in Congress are having second thoughts about the Patriot Act. One amendment, sponsored by Congressman Butch Otter of Idaho and cosponsored by Paul, denies funding for the Justice department to execute so-called "sneak and peek" warrants authorized by the Patriot Act. "Sneak and peek" warrants enable federal authorities to search a person's home, office, or personal property without the person's knowledge! This secrecy upsets decades of legal precedent requiring that an individual be served with a warrant before a search. The House voted overwhelmingly not to fund this overzealous federal police practice. The House
also unanimously passed an amendment prohibiting funds for the Justice
department to force libraries and bookstores to turn over records of
books read by their patrons. Librarians around the country have led
the charge against this provision in the Patriot Act, arguing that Americans
have always been free to read whatever they choose without being monitored
by government.
The battle against the Patriot Act has only just begun, however, as
the Senate could strip the new restrictions passed by the House. Both
the administration and congressional leadership continue to support
the Act, despite public outcry against it and growing opposition among
rank and file members of the House. Paul and hundreds of his House colleagues
now hope to capitalize on their momentum by working to repeal all or
part of the Patriot Act itself.
Ron Paul is a Republican Congressman from Texas. He was the 1988 Libertarian Party candidate for President.
|
Previous articles by Rep. Ron Paul Ron
Paul Applauds Congressional Restrictions on Patriot Act Phony
Justifications for War What
Happened to Conservatives? An
Appointed Congress? Iraq:
What Are We Getting Into? Keep
the United Nations out of Iraq and America Don't
Antagonize Our Trading Partners The
Myth of War Prosperity Another
United Nations War? Buying
War Allies and 'Friends' with Foreign Aid Conscription
Is Slavery Waning
Prospects for Peace in 2003? What
Does Regime Change in Iraq Really Mean? Our
Incoherent Foreign Policy Fuels Middle East Turmoil Homeland
Security Is the Largest Federal Expansion in 50 Years Unintended
Consequences The
Homeland Security Monstrosity Oppose
The New Homeland Security Bureaucracy! Honoring
Our Military Veterans Opposing
the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Congress
Must Say Yes or No to War Is
Congress Relevant with Regards to War? Can
We Afford This War? War
is a Political Mistake Entangling
Alliances Distort our Foreign Policy Questions
that Won't Be Asked About Iraq A
Foreign Policy for Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty Arguments
Against a War in Iraq Important
Questions About War in Iraq War
in Iraq, War on the Rule of Law Will
Congress Debate War with Iraq? The
Homeland Security Non-Debate Department
of Homeland Security Who Needs It? Opening
Cuban Markets Good for Cubans and Americans Is
America a Police State? Inspection
or Invasion in Iraq? Don't
Force Taxpayers to Fund Nation-Building in Afghanistan Say
No to Conscription Statement
in Support of a Balanced Approach to the Middle East Peace Process The
Founding Fathers Were Right About Foreign Affairs |