|
Stay
Out of Liberia!
|
|
|
Stay
Out of Liberia!
|
|
|
|||
|
The United States military has no role – either alone or as part of a multinational force – in Liberia. We all recognize the tragedy in Liberia. A civil war has raged there for the past 14 years, leaving thousands dead and a million without homes. Horrific stories of atrocities abound. We wish for peace and a resolution to the conflict. But we must recognize that this resolution should come through regional West African efforts. These are the countries involved and affected; these are the countries with the most incentive to resolve the problem. Simply stated, there is no US national security interest at stake in the conflict – no matter how widely "national interest" is defined. But the administration is currently pondering repeated calls by some in the US and especially the United Nations to commit thousands of troops to a full-fledged American operation in Liberia. According to press reports, the Pentagon has just ordered about 4,500 sailors and marines from the Horn of Africa into the Mediterranean Sea, so as to be closer to Liberia just in case. Before
we commit our troops to yet another foreign intervention, Congress must
at the very least consider the implications of further committing our
already seriously overextended military. According to recent press reporting,
of the 33 brigades that make up the entirety of the US Army's active
duty combat forces, all but just three brigades are either currently
engaged in Iraq, Afghanistan, South Korea; are committed to other missions;
or are reconstituting. This suggests that the US military is in serious
danger of becoming over-extended.
Ron Paul is a Republican Congressman from Texas. He was the 1988 Libertarian Party candidate for President.
|
Previous articles by Rep. Ron Paul Ron
Paul Applauds Congressional Restrictions on Patriot Act Phony
Justifications for War What
Happened to Conservatives? An
Appointed Congress? Iraq:
What Are We Getting Into? Keep
the United Nations out of Iraq – and America Don't
Antagonize Our Trading Partners The
Myth of War Prosperity Another
United Nations War? Buying
War Allies and 'Friends' with Foreign Aid Conscription
Is Slavery Waning
Prospects for Peace in 2003? What
Does Regime Change in Iraq Really Mean? Our
Incoherent Foreign Policy Fuels Middle East Turmoil Homeland
Security Is the Largest Federal Expansion in 50 Years Unintended
Consequences The
Homeland Security Monstrosity Oppose
The New Homeland Security Bureaucracy! Honoring
Our Military Veterans Opposing
the Use of Military Force Against Iraq Congress
Must Say Yes or No to War Is
Congress Relevant with Regards to War? Can
We Afford This War? War
is a Political Mistake Entangling
Alliances Distort our Foreign Policy Questions
that Won't Be Asked About Iraq A
Foreign Policy for Peace, Prosperity, and Liberty Arguments
Against a War in Iraq Important
Questions About War in Iraq War
in Iraq, War on the Rule of Law Will
Congress Debate War with Iraq? The
Homeland Security Non-Debate Department
of Homeland Security – Who Needs It? Opening
Cuban Markets Good for Cubans and Americans Is
America a Police State? Inspection
or Invasion in Iraq? Don't
Force Taxpayers to Fund Nation-Building in Afghanistan Say
No to Conscription Statement
in Support of a Balanced Approach to the Middle East Peace Process The
Founding Fathers Were Right About Foreign Affairs |
||
There is no US interest in the conflict and US military involvement
could well lead to resentment and more violence against US troops, as
we saw in Somalia. We must ponder this possibility before yet again
putting our men and women in uniform in harm's way.