Highlights
 
Quotable
A rational army would run away.
Charles de Secondat, baron de Montesquieu
Original Letters Blog US Casualties Contact Donate

 

June 25, 2008

Change We Can Believe In?


Charles Peña

The slogan of Sen. Barack Obama's presidential campaign is "change we can believe in." It's clear that Obama believes we need to change course with regard to Iraq. In January 2007, he introduced legislation calling for removing combat brigades from Iraq by March 31, 2008, and declared, "It is time for us to fundamentally change our policy. It is time to give Iraqis their country back." And according to his presidential campaign Web site: "Obama will immediately begin to remove our troops from Iraq. He will remove one to two combat brigades each month, and have all of our combat brigades out of Iraq within 16 months."

Like the proverbial joke about a thousand lawyers at the bottom of the sea, Obama's Iraq intentions are a good start. But what about the rest of his foreign policy? A look at his current National Security Working Group provides some insight.

Some are former members of Congress and no big surprises. Sam Nunn was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and co-author of the Nunn-Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) legislation that has resulted in the destruction or deactivation of over 6,000 nuclear warheads and 500 intercontinental ballistic missiles, as well as security upgrades to protect fissile material and nuclear warhead storage sites. David Boren was former chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Lee Hamilton served on the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the U.S. House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, and after leaving Congress he was the vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission and the co-chair of the Iraq Study Group. Tim Roemer also served on the 9/11 Commission.

The group also includes two former Clinton administration secretaries of state: Warren Christopher and Madeleine Albright. This is the same Warren Christopher who advocated U.S. intervention in Bosnia using the specious argument that the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina was a threat to international peace and security. (Another Obama adviser, Jim Steinberg, similarly argued as director of policy planning at the State Department that if the United States did not act "we would face the imminent danger of a widening war that could embroil our allies, undermine NATO's credibility, destabilize nearby democracies, and drive a wedge between the United States and Russia.") Following in the footsteps of her predecessor at Foggy Bottom, Albright argued that the air campaign against Kosovo was "necessary and right" because the fate of Kosovo was somehow "critical to our own security." (Madeleine Albright is also famous for asking then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell, "What's the point of having this superb military you're always talking about if we can't use it?") Yet Clinton's intervention in the Balkans was largely similar to Bush's invasion of Iraq: both demonized rulers as Hitlers, both were unnecessary military actions against sovereign states conducted without the formal approval of the UN Security Council, and neither involved an imminent threat to U.S. security – and both were rationalized on humanitarian grounds.

Another member of the working group is former Clinton national security adviser Tony Lake, who articulated a doctrine of enlargement to "foster and consolidate new democracies" in order to "counter the aggression – and support the liberalization – of states hostile to democracy," which sounds a lot like Bush administration rhetoric. Indeed, Lake argued that "the idea of freedom has universal appeal," which is the same argument President Bush made just prior to the Iraq War: "Democracy will always and everywhere have greater appeal than the slogans of hatred and the tactics of terror."

Other former Clinton administration members include: Greg Craig (director of policy planning in Madeleine Albright's State Department), Richard Danzig (former secretary of the Navy), Eric Holder (deputy attorney general under Janet Reno), William Perry (former secretary of defense), and Susan Rice (former assistant secretary of state for African affairs).

Because Obama has been criticized for not having enough experience, it's not surprising that he would choose to deflect some of that criticism by bringing on experienced advisers – but with so many of them being former Clinton administration appointees, one has to wonder whether they represent recycling more than real change. If the foreign policy change Obama wants us to believe in is only Iraq, that may be the most audacity we can hope for. The question is whether it is enough to believe in.

SIDEBAR

I cited comedian George Carlin in my last column, and he has since died as a result of heart failure at the age of 71. Carlin was a counterculture hero and one of my favorite comedians. Although Carlin is probably most famous for his "seven words you can't say on television" routine, upon hearing of his death I couldn't help but think of this particular bit he came up with during the height of the Cold War when we were threatening to deploy Pershing II nuclear missiles in Europe as a response to the Soviet SS-23:

"If we really wanted to scare the ever loving sh*t out of the Russians, we should start a movement in this country. By claiming 2nd Amendment rights, we should allow RV owners to mount ICBMs on their vehicles. It just makes more sense. Doesn't it? We're a nation on wheels anyway. Why not let Joe Blow help in national defense and reduce the cost? On a three-day weekend no one would know where the hell our nukes were. So lighten up, Mr. Brezhnev. It's the 4th of July. I'm out in my Winnebago with a case of beer and a Minuteman missile!"

George Carlin will be sorely missed – not just for his wit, but for his wisdom.

comments on this article?
 
Archives
Most Recent Article

  • TSA: Tedious, Slow, and Absurd?
    3/25/2009

  • Hey, Big Spender!
    3/18/2009

  • Conflicting Visions of Security
    3/4/2009

  • Portents From the First
    Press Conference
    2/18/2009

  • Obama Wants a Surge
    of His Own
    2/11/2009

  • Terror, Torture, and Empire
    on the Silver Screen
    1/28/2009

  • Why War?
    1/14/2009

  • Why Lightning Hasn't Struck Twice
    12/31/2008

  • Not Home for the Holidays, Again
    12/17/2008

  • More Security, Less Secure
    12/3/2008

  • Missile Defense and
    the American Empire
    11/19/2008

  • You Can't Cut Spending
    and Spare 'Defense'
    10/29/2008

  • What Happens in a Police State…
    10/22/2008

  • Can Afghanistan Be Won?
    10/11/2008

  • The Pakistan Dilemma
    9/24/2008

  • What $700 Billion?
    9/10/2008

  • Georgia On My Mind
    8/28/2008

  • My Energy Plan Is
    Better Than Yours
    8/6/2008

  • Bidding War Over Afghanistan
    7/23/2008

  • Is Iran Still an Option?
    7/9/2008

  • Change We Can Believe In?
    6/25/2008

  • Having Your Cake and
    Eating It Too
    6/11/2008

  • Things to Remember on Memorial Day
    5/28/2008

  • Mission Accursed
    5/7/2008

  • Whither the Price of Oil?
    4/23/2008

  • McCain's Foreign Policy Vision: Style Over Substance
    4/2/2008

  • Hard to See the Benefits Through the Bills and the Blood
    3/26/2008

  • The Golden Rule
    3/13/2008

  • More Amtrak Security,
    More Safety?
    2/27/2008

  • Hobbled in Kabul
    2/13/2008

  • Is Bad PR Really the Problem?
    1/30/2008

  • Shocked, Shocked by Bush's Broken Promises
    1/16/2008

  • Providing for the Common Defense
    1/9/2008

  • Not Home for the Holidays
    12/26/2007

  • Bush's Surreal Iran Policy
    12/12/2007

  • An American in Paris
    11/29/2007

  • Fred Thompson and the Kitchen Sink
    11/15/2007

  • To Bomb, Or Not To Bomb
    10/31/2007

  • Not -So-New Homeland Security Strategy
    10/17/2007

  • Misunderestimating the Price of Iraq
    10/3/2007

  • Greenspan's Unsure Grasp of Economics
    9/19/2007

  • Close, but No Cigar
    9/5/2007

  • Defusing Nuclear Hysteria
    8/30/2007

  • More Troop Reduction Legerdemain
    8/22/2007

  • Memo to Rep. Ron Paul
    8/8/2007

  • Surveillance Society
    7/25/2007

  • Lucky, but for How Much Longer?
    7/4/2007

  • Cooperative Threat Reduction Is Worth the Cost
    6/20/2007

  • Unprepared for Bioterrorism
    6/6/2007

  • Rudy Giuliani and the
    Fort Dix Six
    5/23/2007

  • Good Intentions and
    Unintended Consequences
    5/9/2007

  • Still Whacking Moles in Iraq
    4/25/2007

  • Yankee, Go Home
    4/11/2007

  • Foreign Follies
    a Sobering Read
    3/28/2007

  • Reducing the Risk of Nukes
    3/14/2007

  • Our Pals in Pakistan
    2/28/2007

  • The Future of Terrorism
    2/14/2007

  • Whither the Surge?
    1/31/2007

  • 92,000 More Soldiers?
    1/17/2007

  • Requiem for a Dictator
    1/3/2007

  • Another Year,
    Another Iraq Plan
    12/20/2006

  • Two Pair of Twos
    12/6/2006

  • Worse Than Staying the Course
    11/22/2006

  • The Mother of All Defense Supplementals
    11/8/2006

  • Fish or Cut Bait in Iraq
    10/25/2006


  • Photo - George Cole

    Charles V. Peña is a senior fellow at the Independent Institute, a senior fellow with the Coalition for a Realistic Foreign Policy, a former senior fellow with the George Washington University Homeland Security
    Policy Institute
    , an adviser to the Straus Military Reform Project, and an analyst for MSNBC television. He has also appeared on CNN, Fox News, NBC Nightly News, ABC World News Tonight, CBS Evening News, and The McLaughlin Group, as well as international television and radio. Peña is the co-author of Exiting Iraq: Why the U.S. Must End the Military Occupation and Renew the War Against al-Qaeda, and author of Winning the Un-War: A New Strategy for the War on Terrorism.


    Charles Pena's new book is now available. Order now.

    His articles have been published by Reason; The American Conservative; The National Interest; Mediterranean Quarterly; Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy; Journal of Law & Social Change (University of San Francisco); Nexus (Chapman University); and Issues in Science & Technology (National Academy of Sciences).

    His exclusive column appears every other Wednesday on Antiwar.com.

    Reproduction of material from any original Antiwar.com pages
    without written permission is strictly prohibited.
    Copyright 2009 Antiwar.com