Since Bush's own National Intelligence Estimate
admitted that the Iranians had apparently called a halt back in 2003 to whatever
it was our intelligence community had supposed might be a "nuclear weapons
program," the Russians decided it was safe to deliver the Iranians the
first load of low-enriched uranium fuel for the nuclear power plant the Russians
have been in the process of building despite threats by President Clinton
and President Bush at Bushehr.
The Russians also announced they would provide Iran "a powerful new air
defense system" to protect Bushehr and up to five more nuclear power plants
they intend to build in Iran.
Well, the neocrazy editorialists at the New York Times promptly had
"While the risk that Tehran might divert the low-enriched uranium
for weapons use is relatively small, the political significance of the shipment
is not. It is the latest reminder that the Bush administration's Iran policy
is not working and that Washington and the other major powers are going to have
to be a lot more creative and a lot more tough-minded if there is any hope of
restraining Iran's nuclear ambitions."
Well, how about this?
Why not have the USS
Port Royal [CG-73], escorted by the USS
Hopper [DDG-70] and the USS
Ingraham [FFG-61] steam in and out, through the Straits of Hormuz, which
is only 50 Km [31 miles] wide at its narrowest point. Since Iran's recognized
territorial sea extends outward for 12 miles, that means that the recognized
international waterway at that point is only six miles wide.
Why choose the USS Port Royal?
Well, it's the same class an Aegis Cruiser as the USS Vincennes
You remember the Vincennes,
On April 14, 1988, at the height of the Iran-Iraq War, the USS Roberts
[FFG-58] struck a mine, while escorting re-flagged Kuwaiti oil-tankers in the
Persian Gulf. We claimed on the basis of serial numbers of some other mines
found in the area that it was an Iranian, not an Iraqi, mine.
So, we launched against Iran in the Persian Gulf the largest naval action involving
US surface ships including the USS
Enterprise [CVN-65], USS
Wainwright [CG-28], USS
Strauss [DDG-16], USS
Simpson [FFG-56], et al since WWII.
The Iranians lost one of their largest most modern warships the Sahand, a
1100-ton frigate when she was hit by two Harpoon missiles, a Skipper-II laser-guided
bomb and Rockeye cluster-bombs. The Iranians also lost a torpedo boat.
The Aegis-Cruiser USS Vincennes [CG-49] entered the Persian Gulf a month
later after the fighting died down to "protect" recovery operations
of the mine-damaged USS Roberts.
On July 3, 1988, while allegedly being harassed by Iranian torpedo boats, the
Vincennes launched several Aegis surface-to-air missiles which destroyed
to whoops of joy on the Vincennes bridge an Iranian regularly scheduled
commercial airliner, Iran
Air Flight IR655, killing all 275 passengers [most of them Islamic pilgrims
and many of them children] and 15 crew.
According to Pentagon spokespersons, the Iranian Airbus A300 was mistakenly
identified by our Aegis cruiser to be one of the F-14 TomCat fighters we had
sold the Shah of Iran.
So, fast forward to the entry this week of another of our Aegis cruisers
Port Royal [CG-73] into the Persian Gulf.
"The Port Royal is ready to conduct prompt, sustained combat operations
at sea in support of carrier battle groups, surface action groups, amphibious
assault groups and as an integral part of interdiction forces. Port Royal can
operate in any threat environment.
"Port Royal can defeat hostile surface ships, submarines, and air forces
simultaneously, while delivering long range offensive land attacks.
"Port Royal's diverse combat capability is orchestrated by the AEGIS
Weapons System, the only fully integrated electronic detection, engagement and
fire control system in the world today.
"AEGIS enables Port Royal to detect, evaluate and engage an enemy with
the greatest firepower and accuracy of any combat system.
"Port Royal's weapons include Standard surface-to-air missiles, Harpoon
antiship missiles, TOMAHAWK cruise missiles, antisubmarine rockets, torpedoes,
Phalanx Close-In Weapons Systems for self defense against enemy aircraft and
missiles, and five-inch, rapid fire deck guns.
"These weapons are supplemented by electronic warfare countermeasures,
decoys and passive detection systems.
"Port Royal's antisubmarine warfare suite is equally unmatched. Port
Royal's trio of underwater surveillance equipment consists of a hull-mounted
sonar, an acoustic array sonar towed behind the ship, and the SH-60B LAMPS MK
"Together these systems give the Port Royal the capability to detect
and prosecute submarines over 100 miles away, making it a true multi-warfare
mission capable combatant.
"Four powerful gas turbine engines propel Port Royal to speeds greater
than 30 knots with ease and quickness. Two controllable reversible pitch propellers
assist in it's rapid acceleration and uncanny maneuverability."
Of course, with tensions being high what with the Russian nuclear-reactor
fuel delivery, and President Bush visiting Israel, and continuing to allege
that the Iranians were still a threat to Israel, and could at any time restart
what Bush claimed had looked suspiciously to him like a nuclear weapons program
it was foolish of the Iranians to continue their practice of sending out small
boats into the Strait of Hormuz to document the comings and goings of U.S. warships.
And, of course, these
boats (propelled by out-board motors, with crews of three, all wearing life
jackets) obviously weren't carrying torpedoes or anti-ship missiles.
But maybe they were suicide bombers, with a boat-load of high-explosives, intent
upon ramming and sinking the USS Port Royal, as they very nearly did
the USS Cole [DDG-67], in 2000, while in port in Yemen.
"Load hoppers, load hoppers"!
"Standby to commence firing, standby to commerce firing"!
But wait a minute. If they're suicide bombers, why are they wearing life jackets?
In any case, the Iranian out-board motor boats turned away before they got
within 200 meters of any of the US warships.
Maybe the 5 Iranian out-board motor boats, apparently unarmed, manned by men
wearing life jackets weren't such a threat after all.
This concession came hours after a formal complaint was lodged with Iran over
the incident and just 24 hours after Bush warned Iran against such acts of aggression
and said any repetition would lead to "serious consequences."
More serious than the downing of IranAir Flight IR 655?