<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gareth Porter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nutts</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nutts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=240#comment-200</guid>
		<description>hardruth, thanks man</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hardruth, thanks man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hardtruth</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>hardtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=240#comment-34</guid>
		<description>from http://warincontext.org/2008/01/14/editorial-its-not-the-end-of-times-just-the-end-of-bush/t
=======================================

&quot;Iranian speedboats threatened US warships in international waters in the Straits of Hormuz.&quot; So far only one analyst — Kaveh L Afrasiabi, writing in Asia Times — has pointed out the most basic factual error in this account: there are no international waters in the Straits of Hormuz.

Let’s repeat that: there are no international waters in the Straits of Hormuz. The U.S. ships were in Iranian territorial waters exercising the “right of transit passage” afforded to them in international law by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which the United States has signed but which Congress has yet to ratify. This is why in the video of the incident, a U.S. naval officer can be heard saying, “I am engaged in transit passage in accordance with international law.”

However provocatively the Iranian speedboats might have been behaving, if from the outset, this incident had been reported as occurring inside Iranian territorial waters, the Pentagon’s first task would have been to educate the press and the public about some of the technicalities of international law as it applies to the Straits of Hormuz. That lesson would have sucked the air out of the story and Bush would have landed in Tel Aviv deprived of what he was clearly eager to employ in his latest round of fear-mongering rhetoric. Absent this rallying cry, there might have been a tiny possibility that he pay a bit of attention to the real concerns that resonate across the region.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>from <a href="http://warincontext.org/2008/01/14/editorial-its-not-the-end-of-times-just-the-end-of-bush/t" rel="nofollow">http://warincontext.org/2008/01/14/editorial-its-not-the-end-of-times-just-the-end-of-bush/t</a><br />
=======================================</p>
<p>&#8220;Iranian speedboats threatened US warships in international waters in the Straits of Hormuz.&#8221; So far only one analyst — Kaveh L Afrasiabi, writing in Asia Times — has pointed out the most basic factual error in this account: there are no international waters in the Straits of Hormuz.</p>
<p>Let’s repeat that: there are no international waters in the Straits of Hormuz. The U.S. ships were in Iranian territorial waters exercising the “right of transit passage” afforded to them in international law by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) which the United States has signed but which Congress has yet to ratify. This is why in the video of the incident, a U.S. naval officer can be heard saying, “I am engaged in transit passage in accordance with international law.”</p>
<p>However provocatively the Iranian speedboats might have been behaving, if from the outset, this incident had been reported as occurring inside Iranian territorial waters, the Pentagon’s first task would have been to educate the press and the public about some of the technicalities of international law as it applies to the Straits of Hormuz. That lesson would have sucked the air out of the story and Bush would have landed in Tel Aviv deprived of what he was clearly eager to employ in his latest round of fear-mongering rhetoric. Absent this rallying cry, there might have been a tiny possibility that he pay a bit of attention to the real concerns that resonate across the region.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowbot</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/comment-page-1/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>cowbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=240#comment-33</guid>
		<description>Oops apologies, the last comment was meant to be in response to the Ryland interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops apologies, the last comment was meant to be in response to the Ryland interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cowbot</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/01/21/gareth-porter-20/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>cowbot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=240#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Fantastic interview.  Mind blowing.

Kill the Messenger movie: 

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1991080575212848283</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic interview.  Mind blowing.</p>
<p>Kill the Messenger movie: </p>
<p><a href="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1991080575212848283" rel="nofollow">http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1991080575212848283</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

