<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Christopher Ketcham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:43:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Middlebury Institute for the study of separatism, secession, and self-determination 127 East Mountain Road Cold Spring, N.Y. 10516 Director@MiddleburyInstitute.Org &#171; ~THE &#34;G&#34; BLOGS - Gunny G Online~</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>The Middlebury Institute for the study of separatism, secession, and self-determination 127 East Mountain Road Cold Spring, N.Y. 10516 Director@MiddleburyInstitute.Org &#171; ~THE &#34;G&#34; BLOGS - Gunny G Online~</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>[...] Kirkpatrick Sale speech &#8220;The Logic of Secession&#8221; 43 min MP4 file October 5, 2007 at League of the South conference entitled &#8220;Southern Secession: Antidote to Empire and Tyranny&#8221;  Christopher Ketcham Radio Interview on Secession [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kirkpatrick Sale speech &#8220;The Logic of Secession&#8221; 43 min MP4 file October 5, 2007 at League of the South conference entitled &#8220;Southern Secession: Antidote to Empire and Tyranny&#8221;  Christopher Ketcham Radio Interview on Secession [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Moore</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 03:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-282</guid>
		<description>Check out http://secession.net.  Also http//middleburyinstitute.org which sponsored the 2006 and 2007 North American secession conferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out <a href="http://secession.net" rel="nofollow">http://secession.net</a>.  Also http//middleburyinstitute.org which sponsored the 2006 and 2007 North American secession conferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maureen</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>You may want to check out this new documentary about California secession movements - 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dr0i_B0FNRY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to check out this new documentary about California secession movements &#8211; </p>
<p><a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dr0i_B0FNRY" rel="nofollow">http://youtube.com/watch?v=Dr0i_B0FNRY</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Interesting interview.  Reminds me of the Nine Nations of North America.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Nations</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting interview.  Reminds me of the Nine Nations of North America.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Nations" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nine_Nations</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Game Cat</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Game Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t resist:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give_Me_Liberty

Now how about some comparison with:

The European Union (pretty functional but currently moving to further centralization and additionally getting into control freakery, alas). Decisions are rather &quot;local&quot; to each country (though not local enough for some, see Belgium, a federation of two quite different regions), with recommendations to adapt national law coming down from Strasbourg. So if Berlusconi things that kleptocracy is cool or Tony thinks war is okay, not everyone is affected. I also think the level of shame among peers in such a disparate setting is easier to keep at a reasonably high level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t resist:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give_Me_Liberty" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Give_Me_Liberty</a></p>
<p>Now how about some comparison with:</p>
<p>The European Union (pretty functional but currently moving to further centralization and additionally getting into control freakery, alas). Decisions are rather &#8220;local&#8221; to each country (though not local enough for some, see Belgium, a federation of two quite different regions), with recommendations to adapt national law coming down from Strasbourg. So if Berlusconi things that kleptocracy is cool or Tony thinks war is okay, not everyone is affected. I also think the level of shame among peers in such a disparate setting is easier to keep at a reasonably high level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/02/14/christopher-ketcham/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Scott I listened to the secessionist show. I think you may want to change your argument a bit regarding the Articles of Confederation because of 2 points:

1. The full/complete name of the AOC is, &quot;The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.&quot; The title alone suggests that secession was not intended by the writers. Of course some might say that it had so little centralized power no none would want to seceede from it

2. Technically the AOC are still in effect because of Article 6in the US Constitution: 
&quot;All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.&quot;

Since the AOC qualifies as an &quot;Engagement entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution,&quot; it is still in effect. I once had it explained that it was kind of like DOS is still the operating system running Microsoft office, but no one knows about it.

Also 2 points of related trivia;
1. according to the book, &quot;In the Absence of the Sacred&quot;  by Jerry Mander, the AOC were heavily influenced by the Iroquios Confederation. 

2. The Great Law of the Iroquios Confederation (NOT the US Constitution) is the longest-running, continuious constitution still in effect today. It is about 600 years old and pre-dates Columbus

Love the show

Joey King 
Nashville</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott I listened to the secessionist show. I think you may want to change your argument a bit regarding the Articles of Confederation because of 2 points:</p>
<p>1. The full/complete name of the AOC is, &#8220;The Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.&#8221; The title alone suggests that secession was not intended by the writers. Of course some might say that it had so little centralized power no none would want to seceede from it</p>
<p>2. Technically the AOC are still in effect because of Article 6in the US Constitution:<br />
&#8220;All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since the AOC qualifies as an &#8220;Engagement entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution,&#8221; it is still in effect. I once had it explained that it was kind of like DOS is still the operating system running Microsoft office, but no one knows about it.</p>
<p>Also 2 points of related trivia;<br />
1. according to the book, &#8220;In the Absence of the Sacred&#8221;  by Jerry Mander, the AOC were heavily influenced by the Iroquios Confederation. </p>
<p>2. The Great Law of the Iroquios Confederation (NOT the US Constitution) is the longest-running, continuious constitution still in effect today. It is about 600 years old and pre-dates Columbus</p>
<p>Love the show</p>
<p>Joey King<br />
Nashville</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
