<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eric Margolis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 22:42:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dawson</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 00:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-467</guid>
		<description>The media reported Tibet but they waited until now to do so. They didn&#039;t say squat in 1951 when THOUSANDS were being killed. Because the CIA was in on it. They did that on purpose to tie up China while the US stated a war with Korea. 1951 and 1951. Also that same year the amendended article 9 of the Japanese constitution and allowed for a &quot;defense Force&quot; now the largest non-nuclear power in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media reported Tibet but they waited until now to do so. They didn&#8217;t say squat in 1951 when THOUSANDS were being killed. Because the CIA was in on it. They did that on purpose to tie up China while the US stated a war with Korea. 1951 and 1951. Also that same year the amendended article 9 of the Japanese constitution and allowed for a &#8220;defense Force&#8221; now the largest non-nuclear power in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Dawson</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 15:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-460</guid>
		<description>f Tibet was a threat to Israel thi is how the US news would be.

Extremists Buddhists terrorists and former allies of the Mongolian Hord which threatened all of Western Civilization, were clashing with the Chinese Liberators Tuesday. The Tibetan monks hord the money of their people and want to drive China into the Sea. There is no such thing as Tibet. China is defending itself from religious terrorists who hate the Chinese for no reason. Tibetans are just jealous of China&#039;s economic wealth and freedom.

For years these people have been religious Buddhofascists. Shaving their heads even some of the women! They are totally committed to their fringe element faith. Followers to have been known in times of war (which is constant with these people) set them selves on fire, very akin to a suicide bombing. Imagine what the images of that does to Chinese children?

China has a right to defend itself from terrorism. China should just build another wall, this time a modern wall to keep out the Tibetan invaders by constructing a wall through the middle of Tibet which doesn&#039;t exist. Then maybe with US tax money, the Chinese can demolish homes in Tibet and set up racial colonies for Chinese people only protected by a standing army. If Tibet resists it is because they are racist and jealous. Plus it is God&#039;s will that the Chinese have all of China with no ethnic minorities.

FoxNews has reported that &quot;some people say&quot; Daili Lama is Tibetan for Praise Osama. In fact dick Cheney suggested that a lead hijacker in 9/11 met with Tibetan monks in Prague and that the stones they were throwing at the Chinese came from Iran. They want to wipe China off the map. We have to back China after all 30 million Chinese people died in WWII, haven&#039;t they suffered enough? Shouldn&#039;t China have a homeland free of terrorists?

Sympathy for Tibet? What are you Chinophobic? Call the ADL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f Tibet was a threat to Israel thi is how the US news would be.</p>
<p>Extremists Buddhists terrorists and former allies of the Mongolian Hord which threatened all of Western Civilization, were clashing with the Chinese Liberators Tuesday. The Tibetan monks hord the money of their people and want to drive China into the Sea. There is no such thing as Tibet. China is defending itself from religious terrorists who hate the Chinese for no reason. Tibetans are just jealous of China&#8217;s economic wealth and freedom.</p>
<p>For years these people have been religious Buddhofascists. Shaving their heads even some of the women! They are totally committed to their fringe element faith. Followers to have been known in times of war (which is constant with these people) set them selves on fire, very akin to a suicide bombing. Imagine what the images of that does to Chinese children?</p>
<p>China has a right to defend itself from terrorism. China should just build another wall, this time a modern wall to keep out the Tibetan invaders by constructing a wall through the middle of Tibet which doesn&#8217;t exist. Then maybe with US tax money, the Chinese can demolish homes in Tibet and set up racial colonies for Chinese people only protected by a standing army. If Tibet resists it is because they are racist and jealous. Plus it is God&#8217;s will that the Chinese have all of China with no ethnic minorities.</p>
<p>FoxNews has reported that &#8220;some people say&#8221; Daili Lama is Tibetan for Praise Osama. In fact dick Cheney suggested that a lead hijacker in 9/11 met with Tibetan monks in Prague and that the stones they were throwing at the Chinese came from Iran. They want to wipe China off the map. We have to back China after all 30 million Chinese people died in WWII, haven&#8217;t they suffered enough? Shouldn&#8217;t China have a homeland free of terrorists?</p>
<p>Sympathy for Tibet? What are you Chinophobic? Call the ADL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: truth</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-441</link>
		<dc:creator>truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-441</guid>
		<description>perhaps we should read more articles about Tibet and Dalai Lama:
http://www.tibettravel.info/tibet-history/ - A Brief History of Tibet
http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html -  Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth
http://journeyeast.tripod.com/western_scholars.html
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message523474/pg1 - I WAS A TANTRIC SEX SLAVE FOR A SENIOR TIBETAN BUDDHIST MONK
http://www.newspiritualbible.com/index2 The Secret Truth about The Dalai Lama (Hitler and the Dalai Lama)
http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E01B16E1-CACF-47F3-B391-685F33B2FC21/ - Dalai Lama: CIA Asset</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>perhaps we should read more articles about Tibet and Dalai Lama:<br />
<a href="http://www.tibettravel.info/tibet-history/" rel="nofollow">http://www.tibettravel.info/tibet-history/</a> &#8211; A Brief History of Tibet<br />
<a href="http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelparenti.org/Tibet.html</a> &#8211;  Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth<br />
<a href="http://journeyeast.tripod.com/western_scholars.html" rel="nofollow">http://journeyeast.tripod.com/western_scholars.html</a><br />
<a href="http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message523474/pg1" rel="nofollow">http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message523474/pg1</a> &#8211; I WAS A TANTRIC SEX SLAVE FOR A SENIOR TIBETAN BUDDHIST MONK<br />
<a href="http://www.newspiritualbible.com/index2" rel="nofollow">http://www.newspiritualbible.com/index2</a> The Secret Truth about The Dalai Lama (Hitler and the Dalai Lama)<br />
<a href="http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E01B16E1-CACF-47F3-B391-685F33B2FC21/" rel="nofollow">http://clipmarks.com/clipmark/E01B16E1-CACF-47F3-B391-685F33B2FC21/</a> &#8211; Dalai Lama: CIA Asset</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morley Evans</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-440</link>
		<dc:creator>Morley Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-440</guid>
		<description>Dear Eric,

I just listened to your interview with Scott Horton on Anti-War.com. I hope the Chinese government is listening. I don&#039;t have any hopes for the people in Washington. I have written all of them off completely as hopeless cases. Take a look at this —
 http://morleyevans.blogspot.com/2008/03/military-spending.html

Thank you, Scott!

Keep up the good work!

- Morley Evans 

Visit me on the Web
http://www.morleyevans.com
Accurate Solutions to Complex Problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Eric,</p>
<p>I just listened to your interview with Scott Horton on Anti-War.com. I hope the Chinese government is listening. I don&#8217;t have any hopes for the people in Washington. I have written all of them off completely as hopeless cases. Take a look at this —<br />
 <a href="http://morleyevans.blogspot.com/2008/03/military-spending.html" rel="nofollow">http://morleyevans.blogspot.com/2008/03/military-spending.html</a></p>
<p>Thank you, Scott!</p>
<p>Keep up the good work!</p>
<p>- Morley Evans </p>
<p>Visit me on the Web<br />
<a href="http://www.morleyevans.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.morleyevans.com</a><br />
Accurate Solutions to Complex Problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fanonite</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fanonite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Scott, 

CIA may not be involved, but NED is. You may want to read the following (especially the piece by Mike Barker):
http://fanonite.org/2008/03/26/tibet-the-great-game-and-the-cia/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, </p>
<p>CIA may not be involved, but NED is. You may want to read the following (especially the piece by Mike Barker):<br />
<a href="http://fanonite.org/2008/03/26/tibet-the-great-game-and-the-cia/" rel="nofollow">http://fanonite.org/2008/03/26/tibet-the-great-game-and-the-cia/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:08:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-437</guid>
		<description>One more thing, I personally find it hard to believe that Cheney is religious in any way other than perhaps as part a satanic cult.  The man spreads misery everywhere he goes, animals probably attempt suicide whenever he&#039;s near.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing, I personally find it hard to believe that Cheney is religious in any way other than perhaps as part a satanic cult.  The man spreads misery everywhere he goes, animals probably attempt suicide whenever he&#8217;s near.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-435</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 19:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-435</guid>
		<description>One small correction to what Eric Margolis said: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFD61538F931A35753C1A96E958260

Also, many of the anti-Chinese propagandists like to focus on the unconventional methods that China is using to gain dominance.  Scott should focus on those on one of the shows.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One small correction to what Eric Margolis said: <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFD61538F931A35753C1A96E958260" rel="nofollow">http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CEFD61538F931A35753C1A96E958260</a></p>
<p>Also, many of the anti-Chinese propagandists like to focus on the unconventional methods that China is using to gain dominance.  Scott should focus on those on one of the shows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltlee</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>ltlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-433</guid>
		<description>Many Chinese students who are studying in western countries have complained that their comments to news articles on Tibet had been blocked and/or removed.  In this case, it is clearly my overreaction. Let me apologize for my mistake.

Concerning Eric Margolis&#039; suggestion, it does not make sense. The priest-ruler relationship between the Chinese emporers and the Dalai Lamas was certainly tue. But it was a relationship between perosns. It cannot be generalized to two peoples.  At least not in the 21st century. China&#039;s president Hu Jintao cannot say, &quot;I am China.&quot; Neither can the Dalai Lama say, &quot;I am Tibet.&quot; While Hu Jintao and the Dalai Lama can have the &quot;priest-ruler&quot; relationship, what about the Tibetan people? Should they be under the control of the Lama per the monks&#039; wish?

I also want to clarify the Tibetan independence delcaration. The Qing central government collapsed by the end of 1911. In the absence of an effective central government, all Chinese provinces, including Tibet, declared indpendence.  That is, independent from the Qing government. This was necessary to invalidate the then still functioning Qing provincial governments.  The declarations, however, did not mean that China was broken up inot 30+ independent countries at that time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many Chinese students who are studying in western countries have complained that their comments to news articles on Tibet had been blocked and/or removed.  In this case, it is clearly my overreaction. Let me apologize for my mistake.</p>
<p>Concerning Eric Margolis&#8217; suggestion, it does not make sense. The priest-ruler relationship between the Chinese emporers and the Dalai Lamas was certainly tue. But it was a relationship between perosns. It cannot be generalized to two peoples.  At least not in the 21st century. China&#8217;s president Hu Jintao cannot say, &#8220;I am China.&#8221; Neither can the Dalai Lama say, &#8220;I am Tibet.&#8221; While Hu Jintao and the Dalai Lama can have the &#8220;priest-ruler&#8221; relationship, what about the Tibetan people? Should they be under the control of the Lama per the monks&#8217; wish?</p>
<p>I also want to clarify the Tibetan independence delcaration. The Qing central government collapsed by the end of 1911. In the absence of an effective central government, all Chinese provinces, including Tibet, declared indpendence.  That is, independent from the Qing government. This was necessary to invalidate the then still functioning Qing provincial governments.  The declarations, however, did not mean that China was broken up inot 30+ independent countries at that time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Horton</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-431</guid>
		<description>One got stuck in the spam catcher, probably because of the embedded link.

Why is everyone so paranoid? It&#039;s the state that&#039;s out to get you, not antiwar.com. 

Now, let me go fetch that comment for you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One got stuck in the spam catcher, probably because of the embedded link.</p>
<p>Why is everyone so paranoid? It&#8217;s the state that&#8217;s out to get you, not antiwar.com. </p>
<p>Now, let me go fetch that comment for you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltlee</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/comment-page-1/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>ltlee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/03/26/eric-margolis-5/#comment-429</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that you are censoring my comments. What is to moderate? Simply because I presented a different view?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that you are censoring my comments. What is to moderate? Simply because I presented a different view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

