Comments on: Michael Scheuer http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/ Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists. Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:05:47 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: БECCTЫДHИK http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-4308 БECCTЫДHИK Sun, 12 Apr 2009 19:53:31 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-4308 Спасибо за ответы на все вопросы :) На самом деле узнал много нового. Вот только до конца так и не разобрался что и откуда. Спасибо за ответы на все вопросы :) На самом деле узнал много нового. Вот только до конца так и не разобрался что и откуда.

]]> By: Jack http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-3548 Jack Mon, 22 Dec 2008 02:35:16 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-3548 Oil the problem???? Is it really?? I dont think so.. in that case United States would NOT be so heavily engaged military in the M.E... Why because military disruption is the reason why oil prices have drastically and sharply increased since the war in Iraq and the same reason why we put back Hugo Chavez in power from the attempted military coup because the next day it appeared obvious that there was going to be drastic civil disturbance that would disrupt where America gets 1/5 of its oil..... (Which could dramatically hurt America's economy) Also following that line of thought.. Venezuela would be the perfect place to undergo a military invasion if all of this was due to energy because not only does venezuela have a lot of oil but it would also be in the GEOPOLITICAL INTEREST of America... energy ASIDE.. while invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan have absolutely no geopolitical interest WHATSOEVER... if you want the answer... ISRAEL IS THE REASON.... ALMOST PURELY 100%... the invasion of Iraq was an israeli blueprint idea due to THEIR geopolitical interests.... they wanted to split in Iraq into three parts... creating a kurdistan that would disrupt and debilitate all of their competing nation states in the region Iraq (would be 3 separate weak parts), Turkey (would go through hell with internal strife to put down the kurdish separatist movement), and Iran and Syria would also have to go through bloody and economic bleeding counter-insurgent activity against the kurds.... They were planning that and then to attack Iran afterwards... of course everything has been going really bad... in Iraq, Agfghanistan, Pakistan, and in the 2006 war with hizbollah.... so only future will tell if the Israelis will get what they wanted in the beginning... Iraq into threee parts, Kurdistan area invoking kurdish insurgencies in Turkey Syria and Iran, and then an attack against Iran. (all of which would push oil prices to INCREDIBLY UNSEEN LEVELS) Read John Mearsheimer as well as Osama bin ladin who actually said IN 1999!!! that there was a zionist plot dedicated to dividing Iraq into three parts Oil the problem???? Is it really?? I dont think so.. in that case United States would NOT be so heavily engaged military in the M.E… Why because military disruption is the reason why oil prices have drastically and sharply increased since the war in Iraq and the same reason why we put back Hugo Chavez in power from the attempted military coup because the next day it appeared obvious that there was going to be drastic civil disturbance that would disrupt where America gets 1/5 of its oil….. (Which could dramatically hurt America’s economy) Also following that line of thought.. Venezuela would be the perfect place to undergo a military invasion if all of this was due to energy because not only does venezuela have a lot of oil but it would also be in the GEOPOLITICAL INTEREST of America… energy ASIDE.. while invasions in Iraq and Afghanistan have absolutely no geopolitical interest WHATSOEVER… if you want the answer… ISRAEL IS THE REASON…. ALMOST PURELY 100%… the invasion of Iraq was an israeli blueprint idea due to THEIR geopolitical interests…. they wanted to split in Iraq into three parts… creating a kurdistan that would disrupt and debilitate all of their competing nation states in the region Iraq (would be 3 separate weak parts), Turkey (would go through hell with internal strife to put down the kurdish separatist movement), and Iran and Syria would also have to go through bloody and economic bleeding counter-insurgent activity against the kurds….

They were planning that and then to attack Iran afterwards… of course everything has been going really bad… in Iraq, Agfghanistan, Pakistan, and in the 2006 war with hizbollah…. so only future will tell if the Israelis will get what they wanted in the beginning… Iraq into threee parts, Kurdistan area invoking kurdish insurgencies in Turkey Syria and Iran, and then an attack against Iran. (all of which would push oil prices to INCREDIBLY UNSEEN LEVELS)

Read John Mearsheimer as well as Osama bin ladin who actually said IN 1999!!! that there was a zionist plot dedicated to dividing Iraq into three parts

]]> By: Amin http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2061 Amin Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:36:48 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-2061 Note my origin is middle eastern and I have every interest in America disengaging from the middle east militarily, but I had to make this argument as devil's advocate. Note my origin is middle eastern and I have every interest in America disengaging from the middle east militarily, but I had to make this argument as devil’s advocate.

]]> By: Amin http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-2060 Amin Sun, 03 Aug 2008 12:35:31 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-2060 There is a possibility that we're not exploring, and that's that America is a largely benevolent empire, whereas other major powers may not be. Yes oil still sold to every one in the world at the same market prices, despite the US militarily controlling the region, but would this be the case if it was Russian, or Chinese troops stationed in the middle east, rather than American troops? There is a possibility that we’re not exploring, and that’s that America is a largely benevolent empire, whereas other major powers may not be. Yes oil still sold to every one in the world at the same market prices, despite the US militarily controlling the region, but would this be the case if it was Russian, or Chinese troops stationed in the middle east, rather than American troops?

]]> By: Gramps http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1701 Gramps Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:14:10 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-1701 Am I the only person that believes Lindsey Williams might be right about the oil reserves on Gull Island just off the northern slope(google it)? And, if he is right, this is all about petro dollars not the oil. Am I the only person that believes Lindsey Williams might be right about the oil reserves on Gull Island just off the northern slope(google it)? And, if he is right, this is all about petro dollars not the oil.

]]> By: Glenn http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1696 Glenn Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:11:32 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-1696 Followed link from Campaign for Liberty blog. Nice interview. Nice analysis by C. Fountain above. Followed link from Campaign for Liberty blog. Nice interview. Nice analysis by C. Fountain above.

]]> By: UrMawm http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1694 UrMawm Thu, 03 Jul 2008 16:50:23 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-1694 Agree w/ Cynical...this may just be lmore about protecting Petrodollars rather than oil. The dollar is not on the gold standard b/c it's on the oil standard. Most countries buy oil in dollars...many return those dollars to the US buy buyng US gov bonds. The "fear" is that other countries will begin doing oil transactions in Euros or some currency other than dollars (a la Iraq, and more recently Iran...hmmm) which would effectively cut off our gov's spending spree. As for me I'm rooting for the Mayan calendar :) Agree w/ Cynical…this may just be lmore about protecting Petrodollars rather than oil. The dollar is not on the gold standard b/c it’s on the oil standard. Most countries buy oil in dollars…many return those dollars to the US buy buyng US gov bonds. The “fear” is that other countries will begin doing oil transactions in Euros or some currency other than dollars (a la Iraq, and more recently Iran…hmmm) which would effectively cut off our gov’s spending spree. As for me I’m rooting for the Mayan calendar :)

]]> By: Ron Paul’s Campaign For Liberty » Blog Archive » Don’t Waste Your Commute! http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1693 Ron Paul’s Campaign For Liberty » Blog Archive » Don’t Waste Your Commute! Thu, 03 Jul 2008 15:16:49 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-1693 [...] you.  I mentioned Michael Scheuer recently, so here’s a good example of Scott’s work: one of his interviews with Scheuer.  Read the description and see if you don’t want to listen right away.  Then have fun [...] [...] you.  I mentioned Michael Scheuer recently, so here’s a good example of Scott’s work: one of his interviews with Scheuer.  Read the description and see if you don’t want to listen right away.  Then have fun [...]

]]> By: InnerCynic http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-752 InnerCynic Mon, 21 Apr 2008 20:27:28 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-752 Mr. Scheuer happens to be someone who has spent an inordinate amount of time living within the belly of the beast, like most parasites, and yet he can't bring himself to admit that his agency, and his own handiwork, is part and parcel responsible for the hell that has been created. Now talk about the pot calling the kettle black! Mr. Scheuer happens to be someone who has spent an inordinate amount of time living within the belly of the beast, like most parasites, and yet he can’t bring himself to admit that his agency, and his own handiwork, is part and parcel responsible for the hell that has been created. Now talk about the pot calling the kettle black!

]]> By: 8Ball http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/17/michael-scheuer-4/comment-page-1/#comment-750 8Ball Mon, 21 Apr 2008 14:10:37 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=330#comment-750 The Cynical Foreigner and Captain Chaos are closer to the truth. Scared, old, White men along with their Jewish counterparts, trying to maintain their death grip on power while it slips, inexorably, from their grasp... The Cynical Foreigner and Captain Chaos are closer to the truth.

Scared, old, White men along with their Jewish counterparts, trying to maintain their death grip on power while it slips, inexorably, from their grasp…

]]>