<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joshua Snyder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:43:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: english american</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>english american</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 15:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=343#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>[...] the excuse to enter the conflict without declaring war, how the defeat of Robert Taft marked thehttp://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/Heinle&amp;39s Newbury House Dictionary of American EnglishHeinle&amp;39s Newbury House Dictionary of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the excuse to enter the conflict without declaring war, how the defeat of Robert Taft marked thehttp://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/Heinle&#38;39s Newbury House Dictionary of American EnglishHeinle&#38;39s Newbury House Dictionary of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abu Hatem أبو حاتم &#187; Western Confucian</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/comment-page-1/#comment-1060</link>
		<dc:creator>Abu Hatem أبو حاتم &#187; Western Confucian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 21:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=343#comment-1060</guid>
		<description>[...] is an interview with him on Antiwar Radio on the American troop presence in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is an interview with him on Antiwar Radio on the American troop presence in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus-Erik Hamle</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/04/30/joshua-snyder/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus-Erik Hamle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=343#comment-849</guid>
		<description>According to Dr Bob Bowman, former chief of US Air Force Missile Defense, missile defense is the missing link to a First Strike. Dr Bob Bowman thinks missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles after a First Strike. Therefore the Russians will implement Launch On Warning. The terrible consequences of a mistake will be caused by the Pentagon´s drive for a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. Dr Bob Bowman agrees that the Pentagon will get disarming first-strike capability by 2011/12. Acc. to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy subs simultaneously. The main danger is Russian Launch On Warning because of US First-Strike Capability. Please read Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &quot;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&quot;, 2006 March/April  issue of Foreign Affairs. By 2011/12 the Pentagon will have achieved that the Russians have no choice but Launch On Warning. &quot;Bloody fools in the Pentagon&quot;, stated Brigadier Harbottle, Chairman of Generals For Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Dr Bob Bowman, former chief of US Air Force Missile Defense, missile defense is the missing link to a First Strike. Dr Bob Bowman thinks missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles after a First Strike. Therefore the Russians will implement Launch On Warning. The terrible consequences of a mistake will be caused by the Pentagon´s drive for a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. Dr Bob Bowman agrees that the Pentagon will get disarming first-strike capability by 2011/12. Acc. to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy subs simultaneously. The main danger is Russian Launch On Warning because of US First-Strike Capability. Please read Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &#8220;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&#8221;, 2006 March/April  issue of Foreign Affairs. By 2011/12 the Pentagon will have achieved that the Russians have no choice but Launch On Warning. &#8220;Bloody fools in the Pentagon&#8221;, stated Brigadier Harbottle, Chairman of Generals For Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
