<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Philippe Sands</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:00:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/comment-page-1/#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 10:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=359#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it strange that no &quot;al-Qaeda&quot; have been given a credible trial?

I would think that if they were a real threat, or a real organization for that matter, Bush would be falling over himself to prove it.

Maybe he can&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it strange that no &#8220;al-Qaeda&#8221; have been given a credible trial?</p>
<p>I would think that if they were a real threat, or a real organization for that matter, Bush would be falling over himself to prove it.</p>
<p>Maybe he can&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darryl</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/comment-page-1/#comment-1024</link>
		<dc:creator>darryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 23:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=359#comment-1024</guid>
		<description>the united states can not defeat a few thousand insurgents in iraq and now they want to go to war with 90 million iraninans have you americans lost your minds</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the united states can not defeat a few thousand insurgents in iraq and now they want to go to war with 90 million iraninans have you americans lost your minds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus-Erik Hamle</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus-Erik Hamle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 17:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=359#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>According to Dr Bob Bowman, former chief of US Missile Defense, missile defense 
is the missing link to a First Strike. Dr Bob Bowman thinks the missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles after a First Strike. Therefore the Russians will implement Launch On Warning. The terrible consequences of a mstake will be caused by the Pentagon´s drive for a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. Dr Bob Bowman agrees that the Pentagon will get disarming first-strike capability by 2011/12. Acc. to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy subs simultaneously. The main danger is Russian Launch On Warning because of US First-Strike Capability. Please read Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &quot;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&quot;, 2006 March/April issue of Foreign Affairs. By 2011/12 the Pentagon will have achieved that the Russians have no choice but Launch On Warning as they will have no other means of defense. I´ll recommend Bob Aldridge´s books First Strike! The Pentagon´s Strategy For Nuclear War, The Counterforce Syndrome, Nuclear Empire and his recent book America in Peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Dr Bob Bowman, former chief of US Missile Defense, missile defense<br />
is the missing link to a First Strike. Dr Bob Bowman thinks the missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles after a First Strike. Therefore the Russians will implement Launch On Warning. The terrible consequences of a mstake will be caused by the Pentagon´s drive for a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. Dr Bob Bowman agrees that the Pentagon will get disarming first-strike capability by 2011/12. Acc. to former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-the US Navy can track and destroy all enemy subs simultaneously. The main danger is Russian Launch On Warning because of US First-Strike Capability. Please read Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &#8220;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&#8221;, 2006 March/April issue of Foreign Affairs. By 2011/12 the Pentagon will have achieved that the Russians have no choice but Launch On Warning as they will have no other means of defense. I´ll recommend Bob Aldridge´s books First Strike! The Pentagon´s Strategy For Nuclear War, The Counterforce Syndrome, Nuclear Empire and his recent book America in Peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/16/philippe-sands/comment-page-1/#comment-1001</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 08:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=359#comment-1001</guid>
		<description>Great interview as always, Scott.  It is a disgrace that there are so few voices in the American mainstream media who question the treatment of people held in detention by the U.S. government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview as always, Scott.  It is a disgrace that there are so few voices in the American mainstream media who question the treatment of people held in detention by the U.S. government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
