<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vincent Bugliosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:11:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MGiordano</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-15402</link>
		<dc:creator>MGiordano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-15402</guid>
		<description>Would you be able to tell me how I can contact Vincent Bugliosi? I&#039;m in high school and I have to do an interview for the school newspaper. If you could help please send me an email asap! thank you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you be able to tell me how I can contact Vincent Bugliosi? I&#8217;m in high school and I have to do an interview for the school newspaper. If you could help please send me an email asap! thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jack ronner</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-10066</link>
		<dc:creator>jack ronner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-10066</guid>
		<description>WAG THE DOG  -  MUST HAVE BEEN BUSH&#039;S FAVE MOVIE.  I&#039;M ASTONISHED THAT I HAVE NOT HEARD IT BRUITED ABOUT THAT BUSH&#039;S REAL MOTIVATION FOR THE WAR WAS SIMPLY TO WRAP HIMSELF IN THE  FLAG, ASSUME THE MANTLE OF THE COMMNDR. IN CHIEF AND MARCH TO VICTORY IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.   
 
WITH HIS LAUDED &quot;VICTORY&quot; IN AFGHANISTAN LONG SINCE FACED FROM THE SHORT ATTENTION SPAN OF THE U.S. PUBLIC, HE FACED THE PROSPECT OF RUNNING IN AN INCREASINGLY SLUGGISH ECONOMY (OR SO IT WAS PROJECTED AT THE TIME), AND WITH THREE YEARS OF CUMULATIVE GAFFS AND MALAPROPS HAVING MADE MANIFEST HIS INTELLECTUAL INADEQUACIES.  BY WRAPPING HIMSELF IN THE FLAG, HE BECAME BULLETPROOF.  THERE WOULD BE NO TRUCK WITH CRITICS OF HIS ACTIONS WHO WERE AUTOMATICALLY UNPATRIOTIC AND LOVERS OF TERRORISM  (WITNESS THE CONGRESS LINING UP AND GIVING HIM WHATEVER HE WISHED).  HE REMEMBERED HIS APPROVAL NUMBERS AFTER AFGHANISTAN:  ALL HE NEEDED WAS A WAR! PREFERABLY AGAINST A PRE-MASTICATED MILITARY FORCE WHICH HAD RECENTLY BEEN IRREVOCABLY EVISCERATED?  AND WHERE HIS DADDY HAD FAILED TO SEAL THE DEAL?  HMMM. 
 
ANOTHER QUESTION RARELY POSED:  WHY, AFTER A DOZEN  RELATIVELY INNOCUOUS, IF FRUSTRATING, YEARS AFTER GULF WAR I, HAD IT SUDDENLY BECOME SO URGENT TO ENFORCE THE WMD INSPECTIONS?  NOT EVEN BUSH&#039;S INTELLIGENCE  &quot;CHEFS&quot; COULD AVER THAT SADDAM HAD OPENLY SUPPORTED TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS OR HAD TIES TO THEM, SO WHY THE SUDDEN RUSH TO WAR TO, PURPORTEDLY, PREVENT SADDAM FROM SUDDENLY DISTRIBUTING THEM TO TERRORISTS?  WHY?  &#039;CUZ HE HAD TO GET RE-ELECTED!!!! 
 
WHAT REALLY SUPPORTS CRIMINAL CHARGES, IF NOT CONSTITUTIONAL CHARGES OF TREASON, AGAINST BUSH ET AL. IS THAT HIS HEADLONG RUSH COST US MANY AMERICAN LIVES AND ASSURED A PROTRACTED OCCUPATAION.   HE IGNORED ABOUT FIVE GENERALS UNTIL HE FOUND ONE WHO COULD DO IT ON THE QUICK AND CHEAP.  EVERYONE HAD TOLD BUSH THAT HE HAD TO WIN THE PEACE MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A PROHIBITIVE OUTLAY OF MONEY AND TIME (!!)  SINCE THE MUCH HIGHER TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NEEDED TO STABILIZE THE COUNTRY IMMEDIATELY POST-BELLUM, WOULD ALSO NECESSITATE A COMMENSURATELY GREATER RUN-UP AND STAGING.  HE WANTED TO STEP INTO THE RING WELL  AND HAVE HIS ARM RAISED TRIUMPHANTLY WELL BEFORE THE UPCOMING ELECTION. AS RICK SAID TO UGARTE IN CASABLANCA: &quot;I DON&#039;T MIND A PARASITE. I OBJECT TO A CUT-RATE ONE.&quot; 
 
TO BE FAIR, CAN WE ALL CONFESS THAT, PRE=WAR, WE ALL SUPPOSED THAT SADDAM, MEGALOMANIACAL ADOLESCENT THAT HE WAS, HAD INDEED RETAINED AT LEAST SOME OF HIS PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED WMD, GAS, ETC.  AFTER ALL, BOYS WITH THEIR TOYS RIGHT?  WHAT I DON&#039;T GET (AND AGAIN, I&#039;VE HEARD LITTLE DISCUSSIONN ON THIS POINT) IS WHY DIDN&#039;T SADDAM, KNOWING HE NO LONGER HAD THE WMD&#039;S ALLEGED BY BUSH, JUST LET ALL THE INTERNATIONAL INSPECTORS IN AT THE LAST MINUTE, WITHOUT RESTRICTION.  HE WOULD HAVE ACHIEVED THE FOLLOWING:  1) EXPOSED THE US INTELLIGENCE SERVICE AS UNRELIABLE WRITERS OF RANK FICTION, PERMANENTLY TAINTING THEIR CREDIBILITY AND SUPPORTING ANTI-ARAB ACCUSATIONS;  2) CAUSED UNTOLD EXPENSE IN STAGING FOR THE WAR;  3) M HE WOULD HAVE HAD HIS COUNTRY BACK UNFETTERED BY U.N. RESOLUTIONS AND INSPECTORS, NO NO-FLY ZONES AND ALL HIS OIL PRODUCTION RESTORED TO HIM; AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY GIVEN SADDAM&#039;S EGOTISTICAL BENT  4) HE WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BECOME THE IDOL OF THE MUSLIM WORLD.  THE DAVID TO OUR GOLIATH.  WHAT WAS HE THINKING?  HE MUST HAVE KNOWN HE AND HIS REGIME AND FAMILY WOULD BE ANNIHILATED.  ADD IDIOT TO HIS LITANY OF CHARACTER AND MORAL DEFECTS. 
 
ANYBODY ELSE OUT THERE THAT HAVE WONDERED ABOUT ANY OF THIS? 
 
JACK RONNER 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WAG THE DOG  &#8211;  MUST HAVE BEEN BUSH&#039;S FAVE MOVIE.  I&#039;M ASTONISHED THAT I HAVE NOT HEARD IT BRUITED ABOUT THAT BUSH&#039;S REAL MOTIVATION FOR THE WAR WAS SIMPLY TO WRAP HIMSELF IN THE  FLAG, ASSUME THE MANTLE OF THE COMMNDR. IN CHIEF AND MARCH TO VICTORY IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.   </p>
<p>WITH HIS LAUDED &quot;VICTORY&quot; IN AFGHANISTAN LONG SINCE FACED FROM THE SHORT ATTENTION SPAN OF THE U.S. PUBLIC, HE FACED THE PROSPECT OF RUNNING IN AN INCREASINGLY SLUGGISH ECONOMY (OR SO IT WAS PROJECTED AT THE TIME), AND WITH THREE YEARS OF CUMULATIVE GAFFS AND MALAPROPS HAVING MADE MANIFEST HIS INTELLECTUAL INADEQUACIES.  BY WRAPPING HIMSELF IN THE FLAG, HE BECAME BULLETPROOF.  THERE WOULD BE NO TRUCK WITH CRITICS OF HIS ACTIONS WHO WERE AUTOMATICALLY UNPATRIOTIC AND LOVERS OF TERRORISM  (WITNESS THE CONGRESS LINING UP AND GIVING HIM WHATEVER HE WISHED).  HE REMEMBERED HIS APPROVAL NUMBERS AFTER AFGHANISTAN:  ALL HE NEEDED WAS A WAR! PREFERABLY AGAINST A PRE-MASTICATED MILITARY FORCE WHICH HAD RECENTLY BEEN IRREVOCABLY EVISCERATED?  AND WHERE HIS DADDY HAD FAILED TO SEAL THE DEAL?  HMMM. </p>
<p>ANOTHER QUESTION RARELY POSED:  WHY, AFTER A DOZEN  RELATIVELY INNOCUOUS, IF FRUSTRATING, YEARS AFTER GULF WAR I, HAD IT SUDDENLY BECOME SO URGENT TO ENFORCE THE WMD INSPECTIONS?  NOT EVEN BUSH&#039;S INTELLIGENCE  &quot;CHEFS&quot; COULD AVER THAT SADDAM HAD OPENLY SUPPORTED TERRORIST ORGANIZATIONS OR HAD TIES TO THEM, SO WHY THE SUDDEN RUSH TO WAR TO, PURPORTEDLY, PREVENT SADDAM FROM SUDDENLY DISTRIBUTING THEM TO TERRORISTS?  WHY?  &#039;CUZ HE HAD TO GET RE-ELECTED!!!! </p>
<p>WHAT REALLY SUPPORTS CRIMINAL CHARGES, IF NOT CONSTITUTIONAL CHARGES OF TREASON, AGAINST BUSH ET AL. IS THAT HIS HEADLONG RUSH COST US MANY AMERICAN LIVES AND ASSURED A PROTRACTED OCCUPATAION.   HE IGNORED ABOUT FIVE GENERALS UNTIL HE FOUND ONE WHO COULD DO IT ON THE QUICK AND CHEAP.  EVERYONE HAD TOLD BUSH THAT HE HAD TO WIN THE PEACE MOST IMPORTANTLY, WHICH WOULD REQUIRE A PROHIBITIVE OUTLAY OF MONEY AND TIME (!!)  SINCE THE MUCH HIGHER TROOP CONCENTRATIONS NEEDED TO STABILIZE THE COUNTRY IMMEDIATELY POST-BELLUM, WOULD ALSO NECESSITATE A COMMENSURATELY GREATER RUN-UP AND STAGING.  HE WANTED TO STEP INTO THE RING WELL  AND HAVE HIS ARM RAISED TRIUMPHANTLY WELL BEFORE THE UPCOMING ELECTION. AS RICK SAID TO UGARTE IN CASABLANCA: &quot;I DON&#039;T MIND A PARASITE. I OBJECT TO A CUT-RATE ONE.&quot; </p>
<p>TO BE FAIR, CAN WE ALL CONFESS THAT, PRE=WAR, WE ALL SUPPOSED THAT SADDAM, MEGALOMANIACAL ADOLESCENT THAT HE WAS, HAD INDEED RETAINED AT LEAST SOME OF HIS PREVIOUSLY DEPLOYED WMD, GAS, ETC.  AFTER ALL, BOYS WITH THEIR TOYS RIGHT?  WHAT I DON&#039;T GET (AND AGAIN, I&#039;VE HEARD LITTLE DISCUSSIONN ON THIS POINT) IS WHY DIDN&#039;T SADDAM, KNOWING HE NO LONGER HAD THE WMD&#039;S ALLEGED BY BUSH, JUST LET ALL THE INTERNATIONAL INSPECTORS IN AT THE LAST MINUTE, WITHOUT RESTRICTION.  HE WOULD HAVE ACHIEVED THE FOLLOWING:  1) EXPOSED THE US INTELLIGENCE SERVICE AS UNRELIABLE WRITERS OF RANK FICTION, PERMANENTLY TAINTING THEIR CREDIBILITY AND SUPPORTING ANTI-ARAB ACCUSATIONS;  2) CAUSED UNTOLD EXPENSE IN STAGING FOR THE WAR;  3) M HE WOULD HAVE HAD HIS COUNTRY BACK UNFETTERED BY U.N. RESOLUTIONS AND INSPECTORS, NO NO-FLY ZONES AND ALL HIS OIL PRODUCTION RESTORED TO HIM; AND, MOST IMPORTANTLY GIVEN SADDAM&#039;S EGOTISTICAL BENT  4) HE WOULD HAVE IMMEDIATELY BECOME THE IDOL OF THE MUSLIM WORLD.  THE DAVID TO OUR GOLIATH.  WHAT WAS HE THINKING?  HE MUST HAVE KNOWN HE AND HIS REGIME AND FAMILY WOULD BE ANNIHILATED.  ADD IDIOT TO HIS LITANY OF CHARACTER AND MORAL DEFECTS. </p>
<p>ANYBODY ELSE OUT THERE THAT HAVE WONDERED ABOUT ANY OF THIS? </p>
<p>JACK RONNER</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janna Creighton</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-6786</link>
		<dc:creator>Janna Creighton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 03:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-6786</guid>
		<description>please if anyone has any contact info.. i would like to contact mr bugliosi myself too, about questions and opinions on the manson murders. thanks. janna_banana15@hotmail.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please if anyone has any contact info.. i would like to contact mr bugliosi myself too, about questions and opinions on the manson murders. thanks. <a href="mailto:janna_banana15@hotmail.com">janna_banana15@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maureen</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-6753</link>
		<dc:creator>maureen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-6753</guid>
		<description>I am halfway thru the book - so WHY did Bush and gang  want to go to war w/ Iraq?  The point could have been made earlier.  Pl answer.
maureen @techtrak.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am halfway thru the book &#8211; so WHY did Bush and gang  want to go to war w/ Iraq?  The point could have been made earlier.  Pl answer.<br />
maureen @techtrak.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephanie pannozzo</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-6494</link>
		<dc:creator>stephanie pannozzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-6494</guid>
		<description>dear mr. Bugliosi, I just found out that one of Manson followers ; Susan Atkins had passed away. How did you felt about that? What did you think about Susan Atkins today? Do you think she was a different person than she was 40 years ago? Stephanie Pannozzo. spannozzo@roadrunner.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dear mr. Bugliosi, I just found out that one of Manson followers ; Susan Atkins had passed away. How did you felt about that? What did you think about Susan Atkins today? Do you think she was a different person than she was 40 years ago? Stephanie Pannozzo. <a href="mailto:spannozzo@roadrunner.com">spannozzo@roadrunner.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie Appel</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-6270</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie Appel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-6270</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d greatly appreciate Vincent Bugliosi&#039;s contact info...someone please help me out. Thanks!!!! 
barrieapp@aol.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;d greatly appreciate Vincent Bugliosi&#039;s contact info&#8230;someone please help me out. Thanks!!!!<br />
<a href="mailto:barrieapp@aol.com">barrieapp@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barrie Appel</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-6269</link>
		<dc:creator>Barrie Appel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:09:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-6269</guid>
		<description>Anthony.....my investigative skills aren&#039;t what I&#039;d like them to be!  If you&#039;ve received anything regarding &#039;contact&#039; info, would you share it with me....please. Thanks in advance!  
Sincerely, 
barrieapp@aol.com </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony&#8230;..my investigative skills aren&#039;t what I&#039;d like them to be!  If you&#039;ve received anything regarding &#039;contact&#039; info, would you share it with me&#8230;.please. Thanks in advance!<br />
Sincerely,<br />
<a href="mailto:barrieapp@aol.com">barrieapp@aol.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-3813</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 00:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-3813</guid>
		<description>Since March 2003 I have thought exactly as Vincent Bugliosi and felt myself in an isolated vacuum. It has taken until February 2009 to see this book. Halleluluhhhhh.
I feel vindicated - there are other souls such as mine.

Vincent, I agree with everything you write and I have only just started reading your book. The Clinton debacle etc.

I agree so wholeheartedly with your statement about Limbaugh &quot;an uncommonly loathsome individual&quot;.

But, I am extremely worried  that that loathsome individual is still given credence.

I am also extremely concerned that more troops are being sent to Afghanistan.

I am also extremely terrified of the dangerous right wing Republican party that continues to have so much power in this nation and is supported by almost half the people in this nation.  I keep waiting to hear something come from the Republicans mouths that doesn&#039;t fill my heart with fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since March 2003 I have thought exactly as Vincent Bugliosi and felt myself in an isolated vacuum. It has taken until February 2009 to see this book. Halleluluhhhhh.<br />
I feel vindicated &#8211; there are other souls such as mine.</p>
<p>Vincent, I agree with everything you write and I have only just started reading your book. The Clinton debacle etc.</p>
<p>I agree so wholeheartedly with your statement about Limbaugh &#8220;an uncommonly loathsome individual&#8221;.</p>
<p>But, I am extremely worried  that that loathsome individual is still given credence.</p>
<p>I am also extremely concerned that more troops are being sent to Afghanistan.</p>
<p>I am also extremely terrified of the dangerous right wing Republican party that continues to have so much power in this nation and is supported by almost half the people in this nation.  I keep waiting to hear something come from the Republicans mouths that doesn&#8217;t fill my heart with fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jerry</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-3666</link>
		<dc:creator>jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-3666</guid>
		<description>Vincent Bugliosi is brilliant!  I am sure he is aware of this, but some of his fans may not be.  Bush could be found not guilty, could be pardoned, a sentence could be commuted, or he may never even be formally charged with a crime.  The republican controlled supreme court could reverse a conviction.  Regardless, any of the many thousands of widows of US soldiers who died in Iraq may, at any time, file a LAWSUIT against bush for violating the civil rights of their deceased husbands by bringing the nation into war under false pretenses, resulting in the deaths of those husbands.  It worked against OJ Simpson.  He cannot be &quot;pardoned&quot; for torts.  Appeal would be his only recourse.  All that is necessary for a judgment is to establish a 51% probability that bush did that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vincent Bugliosi is brilliant!  I am sure he is aware of this, but some of his fans may not be.  Bush could be found not guilty, could be pardoned, a sentence could be commuted, or he may never even be formally charged with a crime.  The republican controlled supreme court could reverse a conviction.  Regardless, any of the many thousands of widows of US soldiers who died in Iraq may, at any time, file a LAWSUIT against bush for violating the civil rights of their deceased husbands by bringing the nation into war under false pretenses, resulting in the deaths of those husbands.  It worked against OJ Simpson.  He cannot be &#8220;pardoned&#8221; for torts.  Appeal would be his only recourse.  All that is necessary for a judgment is to establish a 51% probability that bush did that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Walsh</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/05/29/vincent-bugliosi/comment-page-1/#comment-3633</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 21:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=375#comment-3633</guid>
		<description>If Bush ever does go on trial under oath he must tell us the real reason for the invasion of Iraq.All the reasons they gave us were the pre 9/11 reasons. I believe the real motivation is obvious and makes too much sense for it not to be true. In Afganistan the terrorist were out in the open on a battlefield, once that campaign was done they went back into hiding.Bush was determined to use military might so he had to draw the terrorist out of hiding and what better way to do that than to invade another muslim country. in other words their intention was to create Al Qeada in Iraq,problem is all of the Iraqis who were slaugthered in the process a true crime against humanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bush ever does go on trial under oath he must tell us the real reason for the invasion of Iraq.All the reasons they gave us were the pre 9/11 reasons. I believe the real motivation is obvious and makes too much sense for it not to be true. In Afganistan the terrorist were out in the open on a battlefield, once that campaign was done they went back into hiding.Bush was determined to use military might so he had to draw the terrorist out of hiding and what better way to do that than to invade another muslim country. in other words their intention was to create Al Qeada in Iraq,problem is all of the Iraqis who were slaugthered in the process a true crime against humanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

