<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Scheuer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Horton</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3164</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 18:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3164</guid>
		<description>Anne,

Which part? Where I said Republicans always expand government more than Dems?

Scheuer is a Ron Paul guy like me, so (without listening to the whole thing again) I don&#039;t know why I would have done such a thing as what you describe in the interview - &quot;trying to put him in his place&quot; and such.

Plus, didn&#039;t I complain to Glenn last week about the liberals abandoning their antiwar stances in favor of their Obama worship and all that?

Either way, I have a difficult task in trying to get the best out of my liberal and conservative guests without beating them over the head about the parts of what they say that drive me crazy. Sometimes I&#039;m worse at it than others. Apologies to those offended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne,</p>
<p>Which part? Where I said Republicans always expand government more than Dems?</p>
<p>Scheuer is a Ron Paul guy like me, so (without listening to the whole thing again) I don&#8217;t know why I would have done such a thing as what you describe in the interview &#8211; &#8220;trying to put him in his place&#8221; and such.</p>
<p>Plus, didn&#8217;t I complain to Glenn last week about the liberals abandoning their antiwar stances in favor of their Obama worship and all that?</p>
<p>Either way, I have a difficult task in trying to get the best out of my liberal and conservative guests without beating them over the head about the parts of what they say that drive me crazy. Sometimes I&#8217;m worse at it than others. Apologies to those offended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne s</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3162</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2008 08:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3162</guid>
		<description>So you don&#039;t like conservatives Scott?  Okok.  Why does Michael Scheuer need to be told this, like he defends and represents them, when he clearly doesn&#039;t, which is why he&#039;s on your show in the first place?  It&#039;s like you&#039;re trying to put him in his place for being a big bad conservative.  A bit embarrassing.   

Let&#039;s see you do it to a liberal....hang on, they would never go on your show again if you did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you don&#8217;t like conservatives Scott?  Okok.  Why does Michael Scheuer need to be told this, like he defends and represents them, when he clearly doesn&#8217;t, which is why he&#8217;s on your show in the first place?  It&#8217;s like you&#8217;re trying to put him in his place for being a big bad conservative.  A bit embarrassing.   </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see you do it to a liberal&#8230;.hang on, they would never go on your show again if you did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3154</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand why some people seem to get more upset with 9/11 truthers than with government officials who have never accounted for their pre-9/11 conduct.

The Bush administration basically claimed they needed dictatorial powers to prevent follow up attacks. The intel community blamed their bizarre conduct on the lack of power and funding. I would say that 9/11 was used as pretext for a fascist powergrab. IMO, that is more upsetting than the ravings of some Alex Jones fans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand why some people seem to get more upset with 9/11 truthers than with government officials who have never accounted for their pre-9/11 conduct.</p>
<p>The Bush administration basically claimed they needed dictatorial powers to prevent follow up attacks. The intel community blamed their bizarre conduct on the lack of power and funding. I would say that 9/11 was used as pretext for a fascist powergrab. IMO, that is more upsetting than the ravings of some Alex Jones fans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Eff</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>William Eff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 05:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Scott&#039;s format is wonderful because he interviews one person at a time and presses for insight based in his remarkable command of the subject matter itself.  He is civil enough to let people have their opinions.  If you put two people on you get a debate which never goes deeper than surface point-counterpoint.  Scott interviews all sorts of sources, so the cumulative benefit is huge--and that archive is unparalleled.  Also you&#039;re all brilliant and I agree with all of you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott&#8217;s format is wonderful because he interviews one person at a time and presses for insight based in his remarkable command of the subject matter itself.  He is civil enough to let people have their opinions.  If you put two people on you get a debate which never goes deeper than surface point-counterpoint.  Scott interviews all sorts of sources, so the cumulative benefit is huge&#8211;and that archive is unparalleled.  Also you&#8217;re all brilliant and I agree with all of you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3146</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3146</guid>
		<description>No, Kathleen, they don&#039;t want &quot;justice&quot; they want consensus so that they feel their opinions are validated.

If the &quot;Truthers&quot; cared so much about &quot;Justice&quot; then perhaps they should turn their attention to the crimes our Government is carrying out RIGHT NOW in broad daylight?

But no, they would rather join the 9/11 Truth cult, sit in the pews, and chant &quot;I agree&quot; in unison other over and over while demonizing everyone else, e.g. claiming someone is a government agent because he or she doesn&#039;t try and connect EVERYTHING to 9/11 and put EVERYTHING in the context of 9/11.  It is really annoying to meet people like that in &quot;the real world&quot;.  

Do you want to alienate potentially sympathetic and open-minded people when it comes to explaining the problems of institutions like the Federal Reserve, or problems associated with general economic and foreign intervention?  Then by all means, spend your time ranting and sensationalizing the same old 9/11 theories that everyone has heard a million times by now and be perceived as an emotional blowhard.  Or, focus on the big picture, i.e. intervention, blowback, empire, central banking, &quot;spreading freedom and democracy&quot; etc., and show that the emperor is naked by relating such themes to what is happening RIGHT NOW, and you&#039;d be surprised how much easier it is to get people on your side.

The US has been intervening in the affairs of other nations for over 50 years.  9/11 was merely a symptom of the disease, but if you feel that the cure is to rant about the symptoms and not the root cause, that is your prerogative.  Just don&#039;t be surprised when people dismiss your obsessive compulsive tunnel vision because you fail to articulate how 9/11 fits into the big picture and would rather chase ghosts and solve mysteries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Kathleen, they don&#8217;t want &#8220;justice&#8221; they want consensus so that they feel their opinions are validated.</p>
<p>If the &#8220;Truthers&#8221; cared so much about &#8220;Justice&#8221; then perhaps they should turn their attention to the crimes our Government is carrying out RIGHT NOW in broad daylight?</p>
<p>But no, they would rather join the 9/11 Truth cult, sit in the pews, and chant &#8220;I agree&#8221; in unison other over and over while demonizing everyone else, e.g. claiming someone is a government agent because he or she doesn&#8217;t try and connect EVERYTHING to 9/11 and put EVERYTHING in the context of 9/11.  It is really annoying to meet people like that in &#8220;the real world&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Do you want to alienate potentially sympathetic and open-minded people when it comes to explaining the problems of institutions like the Federal Reserve, or problems associated with general economic and foreign intervention?  Then by all means, spend your time ranting and sensationalizing the same old 9/11 theories that everyone has heard a million times by now and be perceived as an emotional blowhard.  Or, focus on the big picture, i.e. intervention, blowback, empire, central banking, &#8220;spreading freedom and democracy&#8221; etc., and show that the emperor is naked by relating such themes to what is happening RIGHT NOW, and you&#8217;d be surprised how much easier it is to get people on your side.</p>
<p>The US has been intervening in the affairs of other nations for over 50 years.  9/11 was merely a symptom of the disease, but if you feel that the cure is to rant about the symptoms and not the root cause, that is your prerogative.  Just don&#8217;t be surprised when people dismiss your obsessive compulsive tunnel vision because you fail to articulate how 9/11 fits into the big picture and would rather chase ghosts and solve mysteries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen M. Dickson</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3140</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen M. Dickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3140</guid>
		<description>Chris, I think you&#039;re missing the point about Northwoods and 911 et al:  People want justice.

They never let go until they get it.   It&#039;s human nature, like many of the slaves, once released, spent the rest of their lives searching for their sold relatives.  Some people call it closure.  Some people feel that more nd more they need to watch the 
&quot;government&quot; because of these cumulative crimes, and that&#039;s a *good* thing.

NEVER FORGET.


Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, I think you&#8217;re missing the point about Northwoods and 911 et al:  People want justice.</p>
<p>They never let go until they get it.   It&#8217;s human nature, like many of the slaves, once released, spent the rest of their lives searching for their sold relatives.  Some people call it closure.  Some people feel that more nd more they need to watch the<br />
&#8220;government&#8221; because of these cumulative crimes, and that&#8217;s a *good* thing.</p>
<p>NEVER FORGET.</p>
<p>Kathleen M. Dickson<br />
<a href="http://www.actionlyme.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.actionlyme.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3139</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3139</guid>
		<description>Who says the two scenarios are mutually exclusive?  You appear to have an overly simple view of things.  It&#039;s all either black or it&#039;s not black, isn&#039;t it?

To answer your &quot;questions&quot;:

Do I believe the story as presented by the 9/11 Commission Report.  no.

Do I think that the US Government is competent enough to pull of something like 9/11 as a false flag, and also have the competence to keep it secret.  no.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says the two scenarios are mutually exclusive?  You appear to have an overly simple view of things.  It&#8217;s all either black or it&#8217;s not black, isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>To answer your &#8220;questions&#8221;:</p>
<p>Do I believe the story as presented by the 9/11 Commission Report.  no.</p>
<p>Do I think that the US Government is competent enough to pull of something like 9/11 as a false flag, and also have the competence to keep it secret.  no.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3137</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 20:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3137</guid>
		<description>And the essential question you fail to answer--do you believe the official story,so full of holes that you could drive the proverbial truck through it, that Osama and the terrorists hit us on 9/11 or is the whole thing a &quot;false-flag&quot; operation designed to get the public to support the central Asian war for oil around the Caspian Sea and encirlcle Russia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the essential question you fail to answer&#8211;do you believe the official story,so full of holes that you could drive the proverbial truck through it, that Osama and the terrorists hit us on 9/11 or is the whole thing a &#8220;false-flag&#8221; operation designed to get the public to support the central Asian war for oil around the Caspian Sea and encirlcle Russia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3135</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3135</guid>
		<description>&quot;Scott fails to have key people on whose factual info is essential to understand events.&quot;

Like I said, you clowns should create your own radio show.  Fill in the gaps and show everyone the truth.  With such explosive revelations as the ones you&#039;ve posted in response to this interview, I&#039;m sure lots of people will listen.  

Or is it more convenient to bitch about 9/11 in comment sections on the Internet and hope to change the minds of the people at antiwar.com, people who are actually doing something?  Maybe if you spend a few more years bitching about how antiwar.com and antiwar radio aren&#039;t obsessed with 9/11 they will come around and agree with you, realizing the &quot;responsibility&quot; you claim they have (even though they have absolutely no responsibility to do any of the things that you request and/or demand)...  It&#039;s Scott Horton&#039;s show, he can interview whoever he wants and believe whatever he wants.  If you don&#039;t like what he says, either don&#039;t listen or do something about it besides bitch, like spreading the truth yourself, i.e. Shit or get off the pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Scott fails to have key people on whose factual info is essential to understand events.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like I said, you clowns should create your own radio show.  Fill in the gaps and show everyone the truth.  With such explosive revelations as the ones you&#8217;ve posted in response to this interview, I&#8217;m sure lots of people will listen.  </p>
<p>Or is it more convenient to bitch about 9/11 in comment sections on the Internet and hope to change the minds of the people at antiwar.com, people who are actually doing something?  Maybe if you spend a few more years bitching about how antiwar.com and antiwar radio aren&#8217;t obsessed with 9/11 they will come around and agree with you, realizing the &#8220;responsibility&#8221; you claim they have (even though they have absolutely no responsibility to do any of the things that you request and/or demand)&#8230;  It&#8217;s Scott Horton&#8217;s show, he can interview whoever he wants and believe whatever he wants.  If you don&#8217;t like what he says, either don&#8217;t listen or do something about it besides bitch, like spreading the truth yourself, i.e. Shit or get off the pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/11/11/michael-scheuer-9/comment-page-1/#comment-3134</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=1789#comment-3134</guid>
		<description>Frank,

Northwoods, lol.  Like I&#039;ve never read about Northwoods, watched Loose Change, read Tarpley, listened to Alex Jones, or been to Rense.  The name calling is pretty cute, but you should get over yourself.  

I was like you once, then I realized there is more to foreign policy then &quot;the CIA pulled off 9/11&quot;.  It is called intervention.  I&#039;ve seen all the 9/11 videos, read all the stuff that is out there.  9/11 Synthetic Terror is an awesome book.  Do I think that 9/11 was shady?  Yes.  Do I think Israel and Cheney knew something was up and either let it happen or enable it?  Sure.  Are there connections between OBL and the CIA?  Duh?  Where I start to disagree is when people claim that the entire thing was some elaborate plan carried out entirely (and competently) by the US Government and then buried.  There is more to intervention then crying 9/11 9/11 until everyone agrees with you.  Reading stuff besides the same old 9/11 Truth arguments over and over and over is not intellectually stimulating.  It is merely another Divide and Conquer &quot;with us or against us&quot; strategy.  

Besides, my point was that you make a ridiculous claim of Scott Horton being some kind of disinformation psyop government agent, and then mention Alex Jones, is pretty hilarious.  Everything Scott Horton says should be taken with a grain of salt, but not Alex Jones!  He&#039;s a patriot!  Since you are into google, why don&#039;t you try typing &quot;Alex Jones Vatican&quot; and &quot;Alex Jones Zionist&quot; into google and see where brilliant insights such as your first comment lead?  Ever heard of Bill Cooper or WingTV?  You should check out what they have to say about your fearless leader Alex Jones.  Alex Jones, is he a Zionist or does he follow the Vatican?  Conspiracies built on conspiracies built on conspiracies, Oh noes!   

Did you ever think that Alex Jones is a sensationalist?  Sure, he produces some good nuggets, but why don&#039;t you look into his work before 9/11 and get back to me?  Alex Jones didn&#039;t just pop up out of the ground on sept. 11.  Why don&#039;t you look into his fearmongering and sensationalism regarding Y2K before you make your claims about how great his reporting is?  Don&#039;t forget to buy some DVDs and a water filter while browsing his archives.

If I want to read about Northwoods or remote control planes or &quot;Loose Change&quot;  or Cuban exiles killing Kennedy, or Bigfoot, or Aliens, or whatever, I&#039;ll go read infowars and rense.  If I want to read/listen to articles and interviews regarding the status of the war, the dangers of interventionist foreign policy, abuses by government, etc. (i.e. not the same 9/11 stuff I&#039;ve known about for years and years),  I read sites like antiwar.com, LewRockwell, CounterPunch, Consortium News, Glenn Greenwald etc.  That kind of criminality is all happening now, right in front of us, not 7 years ago, so while you waste everyone&#039;s time screaming about the same old &quot;truther&quot; shit:  WTC7, Northwoods, NORAD, over and over and over and over, I&#039;ll focus on what the Government is doing now.  I&#039;ve watched all of Alex Jones&#039; videos and I respect the guy, but there is more out there than the same tired 9/11 stuff being repeated for years.  

I mean, seriously, doesn&#039;t rehashing the same old stuff about 9/11 ever get boring?  Do you really think any of the information you&#039;ve posted in these comments is new and interesting stuff to those that have seen it all already?  Do any of you myopic morons who constantly chase the 9/11 red herring ever think outside of the 9/11 Truth box?  It&#039;s like a fucking cult with you people, anything outside of 100% agreement regarding 9/11 is considered heretical and cause for an agenda investigation.  Why not just change antiwar.com and antiwar radio to the 9/11 truth show?  Oh wait, there are already lots of those, you are free to those sites and get off nodding your head and agreeing with everybody, because that is what you are seeking.  Consensus.

I won&#039;t pardon you for anything.  If you have so much to say, you should create your own radio show.  I&#039;m sure a lot of people will listen to it.  Maybe you can add some pages to the sites claiming everyone else who doesn&#039;t 100% agree with the site owner is some sort of secret Mossad/Vatican/CIA/Freemason disinformation agent?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank,</p>
<p>Northwoods, lol.  Like I&#8217;ve never read about Northwoods, watched Loose Change, read Tarpley, listened to Alex Jones, or been to Rense.  The name calling is pretty cute, but you should get over yourself.  </p>
<p>I was like you once, then I realized there is more to foreign policy then &#8220;the CIA pulled off 9/11&#8243;.  It is called intervention.  I&#8217;ve seen all the 9/11 videos, read all the stuff that is out there.  9/11 Synthetic Terror is an awesome book.  Do I think that 9/11 was shady?  Yes.  Do I think Israel and Cheney knew something was up and either let it happen or enable it?  Sure.  Are there connections between OBL and the CIA?  Duh?  Where I start to disagree is when people claim that the entire thing was some elaborate plan carried out entirely (and competently) by the US Government and then buried.  There is more to intervention then crying 9/11 9/11 until everyone agrees with you.  Reading stuff besides the same old 9/11 Truth arguments over and over and over is not intellectually stimulating.  It is merely another Divide and Conquer &#8220;with us or against us&#8221; strategy.  </p>
<p>Besides, my point was that you make a ridiculous claim of Scott Horton being some kind of disinformation psyop government agent, and then mention Alex Jones, is pretty hilarious.  Everything Scott Horton says should be taken with a grain of salt, but not Alex Jones!  He&#8217;s a patriot!  Since you are into google, why don&#8217;t you try typing &#8220;Alex Jones Vatican&#8221; and &#8220;Alex Jones Zionist&#8221; into google and see where brilliant insights such as your first comment lead?  Ever heard of Bill Cooper or WingTV?  You should check out what they have to say about your fearless leader Alex Jones.  Alex Jones, is he a Zionist or does he follow the Vatican?  Conspiracies built on conspiracies built on conspiracies, Oh noes!   </p>
<p>Did you ever think that Alex Jones is a sensationalist?  Sure, he produces some good nuggets, but why don&#8217;t you look into his work before 9/11 and get back to me?  Alex Jones didn&#8217;t just pop up out of the ground on sept. 11.  Why don&#8217;t you look into his fearmongering and sensationalism regarding Y2K before you make your claims about how great his reporting is?  Don&#8217;t forget to buy some DVDs and a water filter while browsing his archives.</p>
<p>If I want to read about Northwoods or remote control planes or &#8220;Loose Change&#8221;  or Cuban exiles killing Kennedy, or Bigfoot, or Aliens, or whatever, I&#8217;ll go read infowars and rense.  If I want to read/listen to articles and interviews regarding the status of the war, the dangers of interventionist foreign policy, abuses by government, etc. (i.e. not the same 9/11 stuff I&#8217;ve known about for years and years),  I read sites like antiwar.com, LewRockwell, CounterPunch, Consortium News, Glenn Greenwald etc.  That kind of criminality is all happening now, right in front of us, not 7 years ago, so while you waste everyone&#8217;s time screaming about the same old &#8220;truther&#8221; shit:  WTC7, Northwoods, NORAD, over and over and over and over, I&#8217;ll focus on what the Government is doing now.  I&#8217;ve watched all of Alex Jones&#8217; videos and I respect the guy, but there is more out there than the same tired 9/11 stuff being repeated for years.  </p>
<p>I mean, seriously, doesn&#8217;t rehashing the same old stuff about 9/11 ever get boring?  Do you really think any of the information you&#8217;ve posted in these comments is new and interesting stuff to those that have seen it all already?  Do any of you myopic morons who constantly chase the 9/11 red herring ever think outside of the 9/11 Truth box?  It&#8217;s like a fucking cult with you people, anything outside of 100% agreement regarding 9/11 is considered heretical and cause for an agenda investigation.  Why not just change antiwar.com and antiwar radio to the 9/11 truth show?  Oh wait, there are already lots of those, you are free to those sites and get off nodding your head and agreeing with everybody, because that is what you are seeking.  Consensus.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t pardon you for anything.  If you have so much to say, you should create your own radio show.  I&#8217;m sure a lot of people will listen to it.  Maybe you can add some pages to the sites claiming everyone else who doesn&#8217;t 100% agree with the site owner is some sort of secret Mossad/Vatican/CIA/Freemason disinformation agent?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

