<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Robert Dreyfuss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/12/11/robert-dreyfuss-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/12/11/robert-dreyfuss-10/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dahoumia</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2008/12/11/robert-dreyfuss-10/comment-page-1/#comment-3481</link>
		<dc:creator>Dahoumia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2081#comment-3481</guid>
		<description>So now is the time that the idea of making the Middle East a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone is going to be taken seriously?  

That initiative was first put forward by the Arab states following the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, in which nuclear annihilation threats made by Tel Aviv and Washington played a major part, and it has been endorsed annually by the UN Assembly ever since. In fact, UN Security Council Resolution 687 of 1991 - which provided the basis for all the evils which befell Iraq in the 1990s and beyond - also endorsed the Nuclear Free Middle East initiative. 

Therefore I conclude that it was all right if a million Arabs died of deprivation caused by sanctions and no-fly zones, and it&#039;s all right if another million Arabs died subsequent to the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq on the pretext of &quot;existential&quot; concerns about a non-existent threat posed by that country&#039;s crippled government and military, but now that another non-Arab country in the region (in addition to Israel, of course) is supposedly posing a threat to the treasured &quot;peace and stability&quot; of the Middle East, it is time to get serious about making that part of the world nuclear free. 

Am I getting this right? Let me go throw up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now is the time that the idea of making the Middle East a Nuclear Weapons Free Zone is going to be taken seriously?  </p>
<p>That initiative was first put forward by the Arab states following the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, in which nuclear annihilation threats made by Tel Aviv and Washington played a major part, and it has been endorsed annually by the UN Assembly ever since. In fact, UN Security Council Resolution 687 of 1991 &#8211; which provided the basis for all the evils which befell Iraq in the 1990s and beyond &#8211; also endorsed the Nuclear Free Middle East initiative. </p>
<p>Therefore I conclude that it was all right if a million Arabs died of deprivation caused by sanctions and no-fly zones, and it&#8217;s all right if another million Arabs died subsequent to the 2003 invasion and occupation of Iraq on the pretext of &#8220;existential&#8221; concerns about a non-existent threat posed by that country&#8217;s crippled government and military, but now that another non-Arab country in the region (in addition to Israel, of course) is supposedly posing a threat to the treasured &#8220;peace and stability&#8221; of the Middle East, it is time to get serious about making that part of the world nuclear free. </p>
<p>Am I getting this right? Let me go throw up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

