Scott Horton Interviews Roger Charles
Roger Charles, a free-lance journalist and investigator, discusses the untimely death of J.D. Cash – the pre-eminent journalist covering the Oklahoma City bombing, the upcoming book from Charles and British writer Andrew Gumbel about the bombing, the failure of Congress to conduct a single hearing on the largest act of domestic terrorism in U.S. history, the likelihood that Andreas Strassmeir was working with the FBI and why Bill Clinton said the OKC bombing saved his 1996 presidential campaign.
MP3 here. (40:29)
Roger Charles was a career Marine Corps officer and has worked as an investigative reporter for major media organisations and news programs such as as the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Boston Globe, Newsweek, U.S. News & World Report, the New Yorker, CBS 60 Minutes and Frontline.
Postscript:
Chris Emery, a member of the Oklahoma City Bombing Investigation Committee, discusses the bizarre trials of Terry Nichols and ATF agent Carol Howe, the physical evidence supporting the existence of bombs inside the Murrah building, the individuals responsible for promoting a Ramzi Yousef/Saddam Hussein connection to the OKC bombing, the current lobbying of Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn to use the confirmation hearing of Attorney General nominee Eric Holder to question the Kenny Trentadue murder coverup, the actual role Timothy McVeigh played and which background materials are most helpful to people trying to learn about the OKC bombing.
MP3 here. (1:23:30)
Chris Emery is a film writer, director, producer living in Oklahoma City. He is currently working on his fifth documentary film which is a feature length project covering the Oklahoma City Bombing case.
Edward Rynearson
December 17th, 2008 at 10:05 am
Another great interview Scott.
Archived Jesse Trentadue interviews:
http://www.jessetrentadue.com
Edward Rynearson
December 17th, 2008 at 8:26 pm
Scott . . can you please interview April Gallup. She was a pentagon employee who is suing Rumsfeld and others for their involvment in the attacks on the Pentagon. Huge story!
This is from rawstory.com today:
———————————————
A career Army officer who survived the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, claims that no evacuation was ordered inside the Pentagon, despite flight controllers calling in warnings of approaching hijacked aircraft nearly 20 minutes before the building was struck.
According to a time-line of the attacks, the Federal Aviation Administration notified NORAD that American Airlines Flight 77 had been hijacked at 9:24 a.m. The Pentagon was not struck until 9:43 a.m.
Gallop also says she heard two loud explosions, and does not believe that a Boeing 757 hit the building. Her son sustained a serious brain injury, and Gallop herself was knocked unconscious after the roof collapsed onto her office.
http://www.radiodujour.com/people/gallop_april/
(non-commercial site – trying to get the word out)
ProudPrimate
December 20th, 2008 at 12:09 pm
wow — this is great!
while it’s downloading, I can’t resist celebrating. If we can agree that OKC was an inside job, to the benefit of Bush 41’s golf partner and Iran/Contra contraband shipping clerk Bubba Clinton, what can be next, but 9/11, and the reinstatement of bumper Afghan opium harvests, after the cold turkey of the Taliban’s 2001 shut-off?
Edward Rynearson
December 20th, 2008 at 11:10 pm
We are basically living in a political Truman Show” arguing left and right with our pre-baked shrink wrapped narratives provided to us by Madison Avenue (the mean Iraqis threw the babies out of the incubators). The real terrorists wear little American flag lapel pins. Well dressed sociopaths (suitopaths) who hypnotize the masses with monopoly money. Evil’s cover story equals “I was just doing my job”.
swan
December 22nd, 2008 at 9:54 am
Thanks so much ProudPrimate and Ed Rynearson. You express my sentiments. Wonderful interview, Scott.
zedsdead
December 30th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
Scott,
I’m 39 years old, and I remember that day very well. There were several newscasts on that day which reported at least two and possibly 3 unexploded bombs in the Murrah Building. One reporter even went out on a limb to state that once those unexploded devices were analyzed, it would be fairly easy to determine who built it. But after that day, you never heard of those bombs again.
I’ve been listening to you for almost 2 years now. I love your show. I’m not sure why you stay so far away from the 9-11 issue. Maybe someone is pressuring you not to bring it up as a topic on your show. I have a hard time believing you don’t find anything suspect about that day.
Anyhow, here’s a great presentation by Richard Gage. I’m sure you know who he is.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4617650616903609314&ei=I85aSaeLB6e6qAOknpnECw&q=blueprint+for+truth+2008&hl=en
Justiniano
June 14th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also.
bondage
January 17th, 2010 at 1:24 pm
Bondage is the use of restraints for the sexual pleasure of the parties involved. It may be used in its own right, as in the case of rope bondage and breast bondage, or as part of sexual activity or BDSM activity. When a person is sexually aroused by bondage, it may be considered a paraphilia, known as vincilagnia (from Latin vincio, to bind or fetter with chains, and lagneia, lust).
Some couples do incorporate elements of bondage into their otherwise conventional sex lives at some point in their relationships. Bedroom bondage games often constitute foreplay. Bedroom bondage is usually mild bondage, with one partner voluntarily being put into restraints by being tied up or cuffed, hogtied or spread-eagled, possibly blindfolded and gagged etc. by the other, who then sexually stimulates the tied partner theoretically at will by masturbation, oral sex, a vibrator or intercourse.
Bondage can be used for purposes other than sexual foreplay. For example, it may be used in erotic tickling or for sexual teasing.
The tied partner's satisfaction is often indicated by writhing, struggling or vocalizations etc. The free partner may derive erotic pleasure or achieve sexual arousal from being in a dominant situation, while the tied partner may achieve arousal from being in a largely "helpless" position in the hands of a trusted partner. Either way, the partners may be playing out the bondage games to act out their sexual fantasies (not necessarily the same one) and many established couples find the experience relationship-affirming, as they both require and imply a level of trust between them that is not normally found within more casual relationships, as well as being a shared facet of their private and personal sex lives.
This form of bondage has its own niche on some internet websites, where images and movies usually depict voluntarily-tied models undergoing inescapable intense sexual pleasure, rather than any menace, force or pain.
Safety rules followed by couples are frequently oral or visual context- and trust-based as the tied partner may be held in a submissive sexual position. Sex therefore takes place with their pre-given consent as e.g. a sex game or rape fantasy enactment. In contrast, e.g. a photograph not agreed upon taken while the restrained person is incapable of resisting can be considered non-consensual.
The use of lesbian bondage by couples in their homes tends to be different from that associated with bondage in (for example) a BDSM dungeon, where bondage may be an end in itself with no sexual contact at all and is often combined with infliction of pain.