Comments on: Chalmers Johnson http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/ Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists. Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Foreign Policy Links | Resurrectio et Vita http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-20509 Foreign Policy Links | Resurrectio et Vita Wed, 14 Dec 2011 16:29:33 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-20509 [...] interview with Chalmer’s Johnson on the overreach of American militarism & interview with Scott Horton on same topic Rate this: Share this:FacebookTwitterEmailPrintLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...] [...] interview with Chalmer’s Johnson on the overreach of American militarism & interview with Scott Horton on same topic Rate this: Share this:FacebookTwitterEmailPrintLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

]]> By: Peelo http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3890 Peelo Thu, 12 Feb 2009 02:49:44 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3890 Well said Patrick. We are all Winstons these days. Well said Patrick. We are all Winstons these days.

]]> By: patrick guinness http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3825 patrick guinness Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:45:23 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3825 In our youth we read Orwell...nowadays we live it. In our youth we read Orwell…nowadays we live it.

]]> By: Therese O'Grady http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3820 Therese O'Grady Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:26:06 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3820 Todd Boyle is so correct. Todd Boyle is so correct.

]]> By: Todd Boyle http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3819 Todd Boyle Mon, 09 Feb 2009 02:41:00 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3819 Why not stand tall, and take a position, simply and straightforwardly. The truth is that the whole U.S. military complex does NOT serve America, let alone humanity. All the wars since at least WW2 have NOT been self defense, these have all been aggressions. The US has killed millions of innocent people in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq who never attacked America. Those people never attacked the U.S. So why did we kill them? The U.S. military as an institution will be judged by the character of its actions. 90% of those people killed, were noncombatants. Children, elderly, bystanders. The US congress and pres. and the US military and their proxies, are institutions out of control. They are in an illegal status, violating laws and treaties. They are NOT defending the territory that is U.S. jurisdiction-- they are committing mass murder abroad to promote the profits and privileges of a political elite in NY and WashDC. The large, and ever growing disparity in global income and wealth, along with the continuous pattern of U.S. military aggressions against other peoples for reasons other than self defense, are final evidence of the injustice of the U.S. empire. Full stop. Why not stand tall, and take a position, simply and straightforwardly. The truth is that the whole U.S. military complex does NOT serve America, let alone humanity. All the wars since at least WW2 have NOT been self defense, these have all been aggressions. The US has killed millions of innocent people in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq who never attacked America.

Those people never attacked the U.S. So why did we kill them?

The U.S. military as an institution will be judged by the character of its actions.

90% of those people killed, were noncombatants. Children, elderly, bystanders. The US congress and pres. and the US military and their proxies, are institutions out of control. They are in an illegal status, violating laws and treaties. They are NOT defending the territory that is U.S. jurisdiction– they are committing mass murder abroad to promote the profits and privileges of a political elite in NY and WashDC.

The large, and ever growing disparity in global income and wealth, along with the continuous pattern of U.S. military aggressions against other peoples for reasons other than self defense, are final evidence of the injustice of the U.S. empire. Full stop.

]]> By: Why does the U.S. need 7 military bases in Italy? - Page 7 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3818 Why does the U.S. need 7 military bases in Italy? - Page 7 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! Sun, 08 Feb 2009 23:20:16 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3818 [...] Posted by Etta Place I agree. I just listened to this interview. You might find it interesting. Chalmers Johnson | Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette I knew, I mean I absolutely KNEW, that you'd been listening to or reading Chalmers Johnson. I [...] [...] Posted by Etta Place I agree. I just listened to this interview. You might find it interesting. Chalmers Johnson | Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette I knew, I mean I absolutely KNEW, that you’d been listening to or reading Chalmers Johnson. I [...]

]]> By: Why does the U.S. need 7 military bases in Italy? - Page 3 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3817 Why does the U.S. need 7 military bases in Italy? - Page 3 - XDTalk Forums - Your HS2000/SA-XD Information Source! Sun, 08 Feb 2009 22:20:28 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3817 [...] and not weakening. I agree. I just listened to this interview. You might find it interesting. Chalmers Johnson | Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette __________________ "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual [...] [...] and not weakening. I agree. I just listened to this interview. You might find it interesting. Chalmers Johnson | Antiwar Radio with Scott Horton and Charles Goyette __________________ "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual [...]

]]> By: paul bass http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3808 paul bass Sat, 07 Feb 2009 13:29:55 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3808 ” Does this make Bin Laden one of the most brilliant and influential men in all of history? Did he set things in motion to bring down the world’s greatest empire, or am I overreacting? no just over estimating the intelligence required to come to that conclusion. many people thought this when 9-11 happened except the homelanders were in no mood to listen ” Does this make Bin Laden one of the most brilliant and influential men in all of history? Did he set things in motion to bring down the world’s greatest empire, or am I overreacting?
no just over estimating the intelligence required to come to that conclusion.
many people thought this when 9-11 happened except the homelanders were in no mood to listen

]]> By: wake up http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3802 wake up Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:09:31 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3802 Bin Laden has been dead since Dec 2003. I think you could call him a patsy. Bin Laden has been dead since Dec 2003.

I think you could call him a patsy.

]]> By: Tim http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/02/05/chalmers-johnson-7/comment-page-1/#comment-3800 Tim Fri, 06 Feb 2009 14:21:31 +0000 http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2352#comment-3800 "Bin Laden wanted us to overreact and we did." Does this make Bin Laden one of the most brilliant and influential men in all of history? Did he set things in motion to bring down the world's greatest empire, or am I overreacting? “Bin Laden wanted us to overreact and we did.” Does this make Bin Laden one of the most brilliant and influential men in all of history? Did he set things in motion to bring down the world’s greatest empire, or am I overreacting?

]]>