<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gareth Porter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/16/gareth-porter-51/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/16/gareth-porter-51/</link>
	<description>Interviews of foreign policy experts, writers and activists.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eCAHNomics</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/16/gareth-porter-51/comment-page-1/#comment-4147</link>
		<dc:creator>eCAHNomics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2650#comment-4147</guid>
		<description>Aha. Thanks. Porter finally answered a question I&#039;ve had for a long time: why does the military want to continue these wars forever? And Porter&#039;s answer is that the military doesn&#039;t want to leave anywhere, as a general matter, and doesn&#039;t want to leave a war unwon. Makes all the sense in the world. Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aha. Thanks. Porter finally answered a question I&#8217;ve had for a long time: why does the military want to continue these wars forever? And Porter&#8217;s answer is that the military doesn&#8217;t want to leave anywhere, as a general matter, and doesn&#8217;t want to leave a war unwon. Makes all the sense in the world. Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claus-Erik Hamle</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/16/gareth-porter-51/comment-page-1/#comment-4132</link>
		<dc:creator>Claus-Erik Hamle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2650#comment-4132</guid>
		<description>Former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-resigned because the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. The missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles AFTER a First Strike. Please see the article by Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &quot;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&quot; in the 2006 March/April issue of Foreign Affairs. The Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Nuclear Winter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Trident missile engineer Bob Aldridge-www.plrc.org-resigned because the Pentagon aims to achieve a disarming, unanswerable first-strike capability. The missiles in Poland will be very useful to shoot down any surviving Russian missiles AFTER a First Strike. Please see the article by Keir Lieber and Daryl Press, &#8220;The Rise of US Nuclear Primacy&#8221; in the 2006 March/April issue of Foreign Affairs. The Russians may have no choice but implementing Launch On Warning. Nuclear Winter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://antiwar.com/radio/2009/03/16/gareth-porter-51/comment-page-1/#comment-4131</link>
		<dc:creator>James O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 07:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antiwar.com/radio/?p=2650#comment-4131</guid>
		<description>Dr Porter has so much to say that is of great value that he needs more than the allocated time to do so. His insights call for a much more detailed discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr Porter has so much to say that is of great value that he needs more than the allocated time to do so. His insights call for a much more detailed discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

